Sparing the Great Saphenous Vein capital for possible arterial substitution and recurrence decrease may be an alternative to current ablation options for Varicose Veins treatment. Conservative surgery of varicose veins (CHIVA) was suggested in 1988 by Franceschi, by limited veins interruptions in strategic points. However, the method did not diffuse due to the need for high Duplex expertise to determine the procedure in every single patient.
Method
Evaluation of the literature regarding saphenous sparing, with special reference to CHIVA.
Result
It has been realized that basic Ultrasound expertise is sufficient for performing GSV conservation. Most of the time, only a few parameters are needed: a junction competence assessment and a re-entry perforator position.
Conclusion
For achieving the goal of saphenous conservative treatment, a limited phlebectomy and possible Junction interruption (crossotomy) may be a simplified solution.
FranceschiC. Théorie et pratique de la cure conservatrice et hémodynamiquede l’Insuffisance veineuse en ambulatoire. Precysous-Thil. France: Editions de l’Armançon, 1988.
2.
NegusD. Should the incompetent saphenous vein be stripped to the ankle?Phlebology1986; 1: 33–36. DOI: 10.1177/026835558600100108.
3.
FranceschiCCappelliMErminiS, et al.CHIVA: hemodynamic concept, strategy and results. Int Angiol2016; 35: 8–30.
4.
ScheerdersERYvan der VeldenSKGoossensLMA, et al.A randomized clinical trial of isolated ambulatory phlebectomy versus saphenous thermal ablation with concomitant phlebectomy (SAPTAP trial). Br J Surg2023; 110: 333–342, DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac388.
5.
MelliereD. Why and when to preserve the saphenous veins of varicose patients to serve as an arterial bypass?J Mal Vasc1994; 19: 216–221.
6.
FligelstoneLJSalamanRAOshodiTO, et al.Flush saphenofemoral ligation and multiple stab phlebectomy preserve a useful greater saphenous vein four years after surgery. J Vasc Surg1995; 22(5): 588–592. DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70044-7.
7.
CarandinaSMariCDe PalmaM, et al.Varicose vein stripping vs haemodynamic correction (CHIVA): a long term randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2008; 35(2): 230–237. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJVS.2007.09.011.
8.
ParesOJuanJTellezR, et al.Varicose vein surgery: stripping versus the CHIVA method: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg2010; 251: 624–631. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d0d0a3.
9.
GuoLHuangRZhaoD, et al.Long-term efficacy of different procedures for treatment of varicose veins. A network meta-analysis Medicine2019; 98: e14495.
10.
ZamboniPMendozaEGianesiniS. Saphenous vein-sparing strategies in chronic venous disease. New York: Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70638-2.
11.
CappelliMLovaRMErminiS, et al.Ambulatory conservative hemodynamic management of varicose veins: critical analysis of results at 3 years. Ann Vasc Surg2000; 14: 376–384. DOI: 10.1007/S100169910064.
12.
SkoogJNelzénOZachrissonH. Venous compliance in great saphenous vein incompetence: pre- and post-interventional changes. EJVES2020; 47: 78–82.
13.
RicciS. The sapheno femoral junction involvement in the treatment of varicose veins disease. Lymphatics2017; 6: 6822. DOI: 10.4081/vl.2017.6822.
14.
FranceschiCZamboniP. Principles of venous hemodynamics. New York: Nova science Publishers, 2009.
15.
TrendelemburgF. Ueber die Unterbindung der Vena saphena magna bei unterschenkelvaricen. Beitrage zur Klinischen Chirurgie1890; 7: 195.
16.
MendozaELattimerCRMorrisonN. Duplex ultrasound of superficial leg veins. New York: Springer, 2014.
17.
MullerR. Traitement des varices par phlébectomie ambulatoire. Phlebologie1966; 19: 277–279.
18.
Bellmunt-MontoyaSEscribanoJMDilmeJ, et al.CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015; 2015(6): CD009648. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009648.pub3.
19.
Bellmunt-MontoyaSEscribanoJMPantoja BustillosPE, et al.CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2021; 9: CD009648. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009648.pub4. Accessed 10 July 2023.
20.
Coleridge-SmithPLabropoulosNPartschH, et al.Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs--UIP consensus document. Part I. Basic principles. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006; 31(1): 83–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.07.019.
21.
CavezziALabropoulosNPartschH, et al.Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs--UIP consensus document. Part II. Anatomy. Vasa2007; 36(1): 62–71. DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526.36.1.62.
22.
PittalugaPReaBBarbeR. Méthode ASVAL (Ablation Sélective des Varices sous Anesthésie Locale): principes et résultats préliminaires. Phlebologie2005; 2: 175–181.
23.
BernardiniEDe RangoPPiccioliR, et al.Development of primary superficial venous insufficiency: the ascending theory. Observational and hemodynamic data from a 9-year experience. Ann Vasc Surg2010; 24(6): 709–720. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.01.011.
24.
PittalugaPChastanetS. Treatment of varicose veins by ASVAL: results at 10 years. Ann Vasc Surg2017; 38: E10. DOI: 10.1016/J.Avsg.2016.07.021.
25.
CappelliMMolino LovaRErminiS, et al.Hemodynamics of the sapheno-femoral junction. Patterns of reflux and their clinical implications. Int Angiol2004; 23: 25–28.
26.
ZamboniPCisnoCMarchettiF, et al.Reflux elimination without any ablation or disconnection of the saphenous vein. A haemodynamic model for venous surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2001; 21: 361–369. DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1338.
27.
BaillyM. Résultats de la cure CHIVA. In: CormierJMFichelleJM (eds). Techniques et Stratégie en Chirurgie Vasculaire. Paris: AERCV, 1992, pp. 255–271.
28.
PittalugaPChastanetSLocretT, et al.The effect of isolated phlebectomy on reflux and diameter of the great saphenous vein: a prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2010; 40: 122–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.03.031.
29.
CappelliMMolino LovaR. CHIVA cure and sclerotherapy. JTAVR2022; 7(1), EPub Ahead of Print DOI: 10.24019/jtavr.129.
30.
CappelliMMolino LovaRErminiS, et al.Hemodynamics of the sapheno-femoral junction. Patterns of reflux and their clinical implications. Int Angiol2004; 23: 25–28.
31.
CappelliMLovaRMErminiS, et al.Hemodynamics of the sapheno-femoral complex: an operational diagnosis of proximal femoral valve function. Int Angiol2006; 25: 356–360.
FranceschiCCappelliMErminiS, et al.CHIVA: hemodynamic concept, strategy and results. Int Angiol2016; 35(1): 8–30.
34.
MendozaE. Diameter reduction of the great saphenous vein and the common femoral vein after CHIVA Long-term results. Phlebologie2013; 42: 65–69.
35.
CappelliMMolino-LovaRGiangrandiI, et al.Ligation of the saphenofemoral junction tributaries as risk factor for groin recurrence. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2018; 6(2): 224–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.005.
36.
PassarielloFErminiSCappelliM, et al.The office based CHIVA. J Vasc Diagn2013; 1: 13–20. DOI: 10.2147/JVD.S49637.
37.
GianesiniSMenegattiEZuoloM, et al.Short endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in a modified CHIVA strategy. Veins and Lymphatics2013; 2: e21. DOI: 10.4081/VL.2013.E21.
38.
AmslerFMendozaE. CHIVA with endoluminal procedures: LASER versus VNUS – treatment of the saphenofemoral junction. Phlebologie2017; 46: 5–12. DOI: 10.12687/PHLEB2346-1-2017.
39.
JuanJEscribanoJMCriadoE, et al.Haemodynamic surgery for varicose veins: surgical strategy. Phlebology2005; 20(1): 2–13.
40.
RicciS. Ambulatory Phlebectomy: sixty-year-old but still looking great. JTAVR2022; 7(2), EPub Ahead of Print. DOI: 10.24019/jtavr.138.
41.
BiemansAAMvan den BosRRHollesteinLM, et al.The effect of single phlebectomies of a large varicose tributary on great saphenous vein reflux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2014; 2: 179–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.11.003.
42.
PittalugaPChastanetS. Persistent incompetent truncal veins should not be treated immediately. Phlebology2015; 30(1 suppl): 98–106. DOI: 10.1177/0268355515569141.
43.
ShepherdACGohelMSLimCS, et al.A study to compare disease-specific quality of life with clinical anatomical and hemodynamic assessments in patients with varicose veins. J Vasc Surg2011; 53(2): 374–382. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.022.
44.
FligelstoneLSalamanRAOshodiTO, et al.Flush saphenofemoral ligation and multiple stab phlebectomy preserve a useful greater saphenous vein four years after surgery. J Vasc Surg1995; 22(5): 588–592. DOI: 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70044-7.
