Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-5
A modified Delphi process to form an expert consensus in Ireland on the essential information to be included in shared decision making for varicose vein surgery
To reach consensus on a core set of essential information for inclusion in the informed consent process to standardize consent for VV surgery.
Methods
Using a modified electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) method, a panel of experts in Ireland, were asked to rate statements of essential information to include in the informed consent process with patients. Statements were rated using a 5-point Likert scale. The definition of consensus was declared at 70% agreement by the panel.
Results
Twenty-three panel members accepted the invitation to participate across three e-Delphi rounds. Consensus was reached on 33/42 statements, covering general and procedural information and the risks, benefits and alternatives of varicose veins (VV) surgery. Several statements remained equivocal, having not met consensus by the panel.
Conclusion
Considerable consensus was reached within the panel of experts but some gaps in available research were also highlighted. This consensus may provide the framework to aid physicians to deliver a standardized discussion of the key elements of consent and shared decision making with patients.
WittensCDaviesAHBækgaardN, et al.Editor’s choice - management of chronic venous disease: clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 49, 2015, pp. 678–737. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.02.007
3.
de MikSMStubenrouchFELegemateDA, et al.Treatment of varicose veins, international consensus on which major complications to discuss with the patient: a Delphi study. Phlebology2019; 34: 201–207. DOI: 10.1177/0268355518785482
4.
DunnMFulfordKWMHerringJ, et al.Between the reasonable and the particular: deflating autonomy in the legal regulation of informed consent to medical treatment. Health Care Analysis2019; 27: 110–127. DOI: 10.1007/s10728-018-0358-x
5.
ChanSWTullochECooperES, et al.Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?Bmj2017; 357: j2224. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j2224
6.
SpatzESKrumholzHMMoultonBW. The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making. JAMA2016; 315: 2063–2064. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.3070
7.
MoeiniSShahriariMShamaliM. Ethical challenges of obtaining informed consent from surgical patients. Nursing Ethics2020; 27: 527–536. DOI: 10.1177/0969733019857781
8.
HansraniVGhatwary TantawyTAl-KhaffafH. Clinical negligence claims against vascular surgery in the United Kingdom: an observational study. Ann Vasc Surg2021; 70: 549–554. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.020
9.
CampbellWBFranceFGoodwinHM, et al.Medicolegal claims in vascular surgery. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2002; 84: 181–184.
10.
RudströmHBergqvistDAhlbergJ, et al.Insurance claims after vascular surgery in Sweden. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2011; 42: 498–505. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.04.026
11.
TennantWGRuckleyCV. Medicolegal action following treatment for varicose veins. Br J Surg1996; 83: 291–292. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830304
DalkeyNHelmerO. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science1963; 9: 458–467.
14.
SchmalzUSpinlerSRingbeckJ. Lessons learned from a two-round delphi-based scenario study. MethodsX2021; 8: 101179, DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101179
15.
BoelANavarro-CompánVLandewéR, et al.Two different invitation approaches for consecutive rounds of a Delphi survey led to comparable final outcome. J Clin Epidemiol2021; 129: 31–39, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.034
16.
VogelCZwolinskySGriffithsC, et al.A Delphi study to build consensus on the definition and use of big data in obesity research. International Journal of Obesity2019; 43: 2573–2586. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-018-0313-9
17.
EubankBHMohtadiNGLafaveMR, et al.Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Medical Research Methodology2016; 16: 56. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8
18.
BoulkedidRAbdoulHLoustauM, et al.Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One2011; 6: e20476. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476
19.
NesbittCBedenisRBhattacharyaV, et al. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014; (7), doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3
20.
KheirelseidEAHCroweGSehgalR, et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating long-term outcomes of endovenous management of lower extremity varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2018; 6: 256–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.10.012
21.
FarahMHNayfehTUrtechoM, et al.A systematic review supporting the society for vascular surgery, the american venous forum, and the American vein and lymphatic society guidelines on the management of varicose veins. J vasc surg venous lymphat disord2021; 10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.08.011
22.
WhingJNandhraSNesbittC, et al.Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2021; 8. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub4.
23.
EvansCJFowkesFGRuckleyCV, et al.Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: edinburgh vein study. J Epidemiol Community Health1999; 53: 149–153. DOI: 10.1136/jech.53.3.149
SchneiderPEvaniewNRendonJS, et al.Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology. BMJ Open2016; 6: e011780. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780
26.
RemusASmithVWuytackF. Methodology in core outcome set (COS) development: the impact of patient interviews and using a 5-point versus a 9-point Delphi rating scale on core outcome selection in a COS development study. BMC Medical Research Methodology2021; 21: 10. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01197-3
27.
SladeSCDionneCEUnderwoodM, et al.Standardised method for reporting exercise programmes: protocol for a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open2014; 4: e006682. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006682
28.
van der VeldenSKvan den BosRRPichotO, et al.Towards an individualized management strategy for patients with chronic venous disease: results of a Delphi consensus. Phlebology2018; 33: 492–499. DOI: 10.1177/0268355517719357
29.
CottrillFABondKSBleeFL, et al.Offering mental health first aid to a person experiencing psychosis: a Delphi study to redevelop the guidelines published in 2008. BMC Psychol2021; 9: 29. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00532-7
30.
(NICE) NIfHaCE. Varicose veins in the legs: the diagnosis and management of varicose veins, 2013. Clinical guideline CG168. nice.org.uk/guidance/CG168 2013.
31.
De MaeseneerMGKakkosSKAherneT, et al.Editor’s choice - European society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2022 clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic venous disease of the lower limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2022; 63: 184–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.024
32.
VähäahoSHalmesmäkiKAlbäckA, et al.Five-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing open surgery, foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser ablation for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg2018; 105: 686–691. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10757
33.
van der VeldenSKBiemansAADe MaeseneerMG, et al.Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg2015; 102: 1184–1194. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9867
34.
SantemaTBStofferEAKunnemanM, et al.What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open2017; 7: e013272. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013272
35.
AlameerAAherneTNaughtonP, et al.Peri-procedural thromboprophylaxis in the prevention of DVT in varicose vein interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysisSurgeon, 2022; 20. DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2022.04.002
36.
DattaniNShalhoubJNandhraS, et al.Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism following superficial endovenous treatment: a UK and republic of Ireland consensus study. Phlebology2020; 35: 706–714. DOI: 10.1177/0268355520936420
