This study aimed to identify the unintended incidents that led to patient injuries (PIs) in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency (SVI).
Methods
PI claims filed with the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre between 2004 and 2017 involving SVI were reviewed. Factors contributing to PI were identified and classified.
Results
Eighteen (13.2%) of 136 compensated PIs in the specialty of vascular surgery were related to SVI. Only 4.7% of 383 SVI claims were compensated. The incidence of PIs was 9.9 per 100 000 patients. Fifteen patients had open surgery (83.3%) and three (16.7%) endovenous treatment. Two (11.1%) patients had necrotising fasciitis, four (22.1%) had deep vein injuries and two (11.1%) had a permanent nerve injury. Two (11.1%) patients had retained endovenous material that required surgical removal.
Conclusions
PIs were identifiable during all stages of care, perioperative injuries related to open surgery being the most common.
MäkivaaraLAJukkolaTMSistoT, et al.
Incidence of varicose veins in Finland. Vasa2004;
33: 159–163.
2.
WittensCDaviesAHBækgaardN, et al.
Editor's choice – management of chronic venous disease: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2015;
49: 678–737.
3.
CritchleyGHandaAMawA, et al.
Complications of varicose vein surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl1997;
79: 105–110.
4.
MillerGVLewisWGSainsburyJR, et al.
Morbidity of varicose vein surgery: auditing the benefit of changing clinical practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl1996;
78: 345–349.
5.
PorterJMMonetaGL.Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International consensus committee on chronic venous disease. J Vasc Surg1995;
21: 635–645.
6.
EvansCJFowkesFGRuckleyCV, et al.
Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh vein study. J Epidemiol Community Health1999;
53: 149–153.
7.
MaurinsUHoffmannBHLöschC, et al.
Distribution and prevalence of reflux in the superficial and deep venous system in the general population – results from the Bonn vein study, Germany. J Vasc Surg2008;
48: 680–687.
National institute of Health and Welfare (THL), www.thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en (accessed 28 September 2019).
10.
VincentCDavyCEsmailA, et al.
Learning from litigation. The role of claims analysis in patient safety. J Eval Clin Pract2006;
12: 665–674.
11.
HelmiöPSaarinenRAaltonenLM, et al.
Iatrogenic patient injuries in otology during a 10-year period: review of national patient insurance charts. Acta Otolaryngol2018;
138: 16–20.
12.
LaukkavirtaMNikulainenVBlomgrenK, et al.
Patient injuries in treatment of peripheral arterial disease in Finland: Review of national patient insurance charts. Ann Vasc Surg2020;
66: 225–232.
13.
PVK. Finnish Patient Insurance Centre, www.pvk.fi/en (accessed 28 September 2019).
14.
ShahRKKentalaEHealyGB, et al.
Classification and consequences of errors in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope2004;
114: 1322–1335.
15.
HelmioPBlomgrenKLehtivuoriT, et al.
Towards better patient safety in otolaryngology: characteristics of patient injuries and their relationship with items on the WHO surgical safety checklist. Clin Otolaryngol2015;
40: 443–448.
16.
MarkidesGASubarDAl-KhaffafH.Litigation claims in vascular surgery in the United Kingdom's NHS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2008;
36: 452–457.
17.
RudströmHBergqvistDAhlbergJ, et al.
Insurance claims after vascular surgery in Sweden. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2011;
42: 498–505.
18.
RocheEGomez-DuranELBenet-TraveJ, et al.
Professional liability claims in vascular surgery practice. Ann Vasc Surg2014;
28: 324–329.
19.
DickhoffCCremersJELegemateDA, et al.
Medical liability insurance claims after treatment of varicose veins. Phlebology2014;
29: 293–297.
20.
KanchanabatBStapanavatrW.Venous ultrasonography findings and clinical correlations in 104 Thai patients with chronic venous insufficiency of the legs. Singapore Med J2018;
59: 155–158.
21.
Kürşat BozkurtALawaetzMDanielssonG, et al.
European college of phlebology guideline for truncal ablation. Phlebology2020;
35: 73–83.
22.
CarradiceDWallaceTGohilR, et al.
A comparison of the effectiveness of treating those with and without the complications of superficial venous insufficiency. Ann Surg2014;
260: 396–401.
GemayelGChristensonJT.Can bilateral varicose vein surgery be performed safely in an ambulatory setting?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2012;
43: 95–99.
25.
van GroenendaelLvan der VlietJAFlinkenflögelL, et al.
Treatment of recurrent varicose veins of the great saphenous vein by conventional surgery and endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg2009;
50: 1106–1113.
26.
SmithSRAljarabahMFergusonG, et al.
Necrotizing fasciitis following saphenofemoral junction ligation with long saphenous vein stripping: a case report. J Med Case Rep2010;
4
27.
RudströmHBjörckMBergqvistD.Iatrogenic vascular injuries in varicose vein surgery: a systematic review. World J Surg2007;
31: 228–233.
