This study was a systematic review of available data from China, and our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stenting in iliac vein compression syndrome.
Methods
We searched the PubMed, National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing Weipu Information Company, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials databases, and key references.
Results
Twelve studies were included (nine retrospective analyses, two retrospective case series studies, and one prospective cohort study) involving 2292 patients and 1897 stented limbs. The overall primary patency rates ranged from 81.8% to 100%. Studies showed significant improvements in patients’ symptoms, and ulcer healing rates ranged from 71.4% to 100% in stented limbs. The incidence of severe complications ranged from 0 to 16.8%.
Conclusions
For Chinese patients with iliac vein compression syndrome, stenting provided significant efficacy regarding favorable patency rates, symptom relief, and complications. However, the quality of evidence to support the use of iliac vein stenting to treat iliac vein compression syndrome is currently weak, especially for Chinese patients.
LiuZGaoNShenL, et al.
Endovascular treatment for symptomatic iliac vein compression syndrome: a prospective consecutive series of 48 patients. Ann Vasc Surg2014;
28: 695–704.
2.
ShiWGuJLiuC, et al.
Dual compression is not an uncommon type of iliac vein compression syndrome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging2017;
33: 1277–1285.
3.
MickleyVSchwagierekRRilingerN, et al.
Left iliac venous thrombosis caused by venous spur Treatment with thrombectomy and stent implantation. J Vasc Surg1998;
28: 492–497.
4.
O’SullivanGJSembaCPBittnerCA, et al.
Endovascular management of iliac vein compression (May-Thurner) syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol2000;
11: 823–836.
5.
HenifordBTSenlerSOOlsofkaJM, et al.
May-Thurner syndrome: management by endovascular surgical techniques. Ann Vasc Surg1998;
12: 482–486.
6.
XuJLiuYZhouW.Mid-and long-term efficacy of endovascular-based procedures for Cockett syndrome. Sci Rep2018;
8: 12145.
7.
HuangCYuGHuangJ.Midterm results of endovascular treatment for iliac vein compression syndrome from a single center. Ann Vasc Surg2018;
49: 57–63.
8.
ZhouWZhouWQiuJ, et al.
Mid-and long-term efficacy of endovascular-based procedures for Cockett syndrome. Chin J Gen Surg2014;
23: 791–796.
9.
JiaoJYuXLiX.Endovascular treatment for iliac vein compression syndrome in 112 Cases. Chin J Min Inv Surg2016;
16: 879–883.
10.
ReevesBCDeeksJJHigginsJPT, et al. Chapter 13: Including non-randomized studies. In: HigginsJPTGreenS (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (5th ed.)
The Cochrane Collaboration, http://www.cochrane-handbook.org (2011).
11.
RenKZhangXZhuW.Comprehensive interventional therapy for Cockett syndrome with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. JPML2013;
14: 130–132.
12.
MengQLiXQianA, et al.
Endovascular treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome.Chin Med J2011;
124: 3281–3284.
13.
QiaoY.Stent angioplasty and balloon dilatation for the treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome in 207 patients. J Vasc Endovasc Surg2017;
3: 747–748,781.
14.
WangHSunJChenY, et al.
Endovascular treatment for iliac vein compression syndrome associated with or without deep venous thrombosis: a comparison study. J Intervent Radiol2018;
27: 627–631.
15.
ZhangAGaoYNieZ, et al.
Efficacy analysis of endovascular therapy for iliac vein compression syndrome. Chin J Gen Surg2016;
25: 1751–1756.
16.
WangXChenGHongY, et al.
Endovascular treatment for nonthrombotic iliac vein compression lesions. J Tongji Univ (Med Sci)2017;
38: 58–62.
17.
YeKLuXLiW, et al.
Long-term outcomes of stent placement for symptomatic nonthrombotic iliac vein compression lesions in chronic venous disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol2012;
23: 497–502.
18.
YinMHuangXCuiC, et al.
The effect of stent placement for May-Thurner syndrome combined with symptomatic superficial venous reflux disease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2014;
3: 168–172.
19.
ShiWGuJLiuC, et al.
Endovascular treatment for iliac vein compression syndrome with or without lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a retrospective study on mid-term in-stent patency from a single center. Eur J Radiol2016;
85: 7–14.
20.
LiWLuX.Prevention and management complications of nonthrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome after interventional therapy. J Med Res2011;
40: 88–90.
21.
YuFLiX.Analysis of the causes and treatment of complications of iliac vein compression syndrome in endovascular intervention. Chin J Vasc Surg (Electronic Version)2015;
7: 256–258, 283.
22.
LiXSangHRongJ, et al.
The observation of long-term effects of endovascular treatment on iliac vein stenosis or occlusion. Chin J Vasc Surg (Electronic Version)2010;
2: 20–23.
23.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009;
6: e1000097.
24.
KouvelosGNSpanosKAntoniouGA, et al.
Balloon angioplasty versus stenting for the treatment of failing arteriovenous grafts: a meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc and Endovasc Surg2018;
55: 249–256.
25.
VedanthamS., et al.
Endovascular recanalization of the thrombosed filter-bearing inferior vena cava. J Vasc Interv Radiol2003;
14: 893–903..
26.
PatelN, et al.
SIR reporting standards for the treatment of acute limb ischemia with use of transluminal removal of arterial thrombus. J Vasc Interv Radiol2003;
14: S453–S465.
27.
SeagerMJBusuttilADharmarajahB, et al.
Editor's choice – a systematic review of endovenous stenting in chronic venous disease secondary to iliac vein obstruction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2015;
51: 100–120.
28.
RajuS.Long-term outcomes of stent placement for symptomatic nonthrombotic iliac vein compression lesions in chronic venous disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol2012;
23: 502–503.
29.
WittensCDaviesAHBækgaardN, et al.
Editor's choice – management of chronic venous disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2015;
49: 678–737.
30.
RajuSNeglenP.High prevalence of nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions in chronic venous disease: a permissive role in pathogenicity. J Vasc Surg2006;
44: 136–143; discussion 144.
31.
LuX, et al.
Endovenous ablation with laser for great saphenous vein insufficiency and tributary varices: a retrospective evaluation. J Vasc Surg2008;
48: 675–679.
32.
MarstonWA, et al.
Endovenous saphenous ablation corrects the hemodynamic abnormality in patients with CEAP clinical class 3-6 CVI due to superficial reflux. Vasc Endovascular Surg2006;
40: 125–130.
33.
KahnSR, et al.
The postthrombotic syndrome: evidence-based prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2014;
130: 1636–1661.
34.
AurshinaA, et al.
Is it necessary to dilate stents in management of nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions?J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2019;
7: 522–526.
35.
LawrencePF, et al.
Treatment of superficial and perforator reflux and deep venous stenosis improves healing of chronic venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2020 8: 601–609.
36.
Luis Duarte-GamasJPRN, Antonio Pereira-NevesMDNBaekgaard N.Contralateral deep vein thrombosis after stenting across the iliocavalconfluence in chronic venous disease – a systematic review. Phlebology2019;
35: 221–230.
