Abstract
Objective
In the Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, nurses from two community care organizations were trained to visit patients at home and provide adequate ulcer care. Furthermore, the one-stop clinic was introduced to set a diagnosis and treatment plan at the first visit in the hospital. The purpose of this study was to (a) evaluate if there is a difference in time to wound healing for patients with UCV treated by dedicated nurses compared to treatment by nurses in the Dermatology outpatient clinic and (b) determine if the one-stop clinic setting would lead to a difference in time to wound healing compared to the standard way of care.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, all files of patients with an ulcer in the Dermatology department of ZGT between 1 June 2010 and 1 June 2015 were studied.
Results
Out of a total of 385 new patients with an ulcer, 97 cases were included. Patients who were treated by dedicated nurses were significantly older (p = 0.002) and had larger wounds (p = 0.008). Age was not significantly related to time for wound closure (HR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97–1.01, p = 0.226). After adjustment for confounders, there was no significant difference in time to wound closure between dedicated nurses (2.2 months (1.4–3.0)) versus hospital care (2.3 months (2.1–2.6)) (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.61–1.67, p = 0.961). The one-stop clinic led to a statistically shorter time to closure of the wound (1.8 versus 2.7 standard way of care, p = 0.007).
Conclusions
Time to wound closure is not statistically different between patients treated by dedicated nurses compared to hospital care when adjusted for the effects of the one-stop clinic. The one-stop clinic gives a significant better chance for faster time to wound closure controlled for both groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.