Clinical superiority of an innovative two-component compression system versus four-component compression system in treatment of active venous leg ulcers: A randomized trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2019
Clinical superiority of an innovative two-component compression system versus four-component compression system in treatment of active venous leg ulcers: A randomized trial
To evaluate the efficacy, safety and acceptability of an innovative two-component versus a well-established four-component compression systems in the management of venous leg ulcer.
Method
Multicentre randomized controlled trial in patients with active venous leg ulcer. Patients were followed-up monthly for a maximum of 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the complete healing rate at 16 weeks.
Results
Ninety-two patients were randomized to either the two-component BIFLEX® Kit group (n = 49) or the four-component PROFORE® group (n = 43). In the full analysis set (n = 88), a complete healing rate of 48.9% and 24.4% was reported in BIFLEX® Kit versus PROFORE® groups, respectively (i.e. a superiority of 24.5%, p = 0.02). Acceptability of BIFLEX® Kit was higher from both the patients’ and physicians’ perspectives.
Conclusion
The BIFLEX® Kit represents a valid alternative therapy in the management of venous leg ulcer according to its clinical efficacy, safety and acceptability with potential positive impacts on healthcare costs.
HAS. Prise en charge de l’ulcère de jambe à prédominance veineuse hors pansement. Recommandations.
France, 2006.
2.
PorterJMMonetaGL.Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International Consensus Committee on Chronic Venous Disease. J Vasc Surg1995;
21: 635–645.
3.
FranksPJMorganPA.Health-related quality of life with chronic leg ulceration.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res2003;
3: 611–622.
4.
FranksPJBarkerJCollierM, et al.
Management of patients with venous leg ulcers: challenges and current best practice.J Wound Care2016;
25 (Suppl 6): S1–S67.
5.
AgaleSV.Chronic leg ulcers: epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, and management.Ulcers2013;2013: 9.
6.
GuestJFFullerGWVowdenP.Venous leg ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes.Int Wound J2018;
15: 29–37.
7.
HankinCSKnispelJLopesM, et al.
Clinical and cost efficacy of advanced wound care matrices for venous ulcers.J Manag Care Pharm2012;
18: 375–384.
8.
RiceJBDesaiUCummingsAK, et al.
Burden of venous leg ulcers in the United States.J Med Econ2014;
17: 347–356.
9.
SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network). Management of chronic venous leg ulcers, 2010. Edinburgh, UK.
10.
PartschHFlourMSmithPC, et al.
Indications for compression therapy in venous and lymphatic disease consensus based on experimental data and scientific evidence. Under the auspices of the IUP. Int Angiol2008;
27: 193–219.
11.
HAS. Dispositifs de compression médicale à usage individuel, utilisation en pathologies vasculaires (révision de la liste des produits et prestations remboursables). France, septembre 2010.
12.
ChaseSKWhittemoreRCrosbyN, et al.
Living with chronic venous leg ulcers: a descriptive study of knowledge and functional health status.J Community Health Nurs2000;
17: 1–13.
13.
NelsonEA.Adding topical pale sulfonated shale oil to compression therapy and moist wound care reduced venous leg ulcer size but had no effect on complete wound healing after 20 weeks.Evid Based Nurs2006;
9: 86.
14.
O'MearaSCullumNNelsonEA, et al.
Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012;
11: CD000265. Epub ahead of print 16 November 2012. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000265.pub3.
15.
MoffattCJMcCullaghLO’ConnorT, et al.
Randomized trial of four-layer and two-layer bandage systems in the management of chronic venous ulceration.Wound Repair Regen2003;
11: 166–171.
16.
PartschHDamstraRJTazelaarDJ, et al.
Multicentre, randomised controlled trial of four-layer bandaging versus short-stretch bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.VASA2001;
30: 108–113. [Mismatch]
17.
PolignanoRBonadeoPGasbarroS, et al.
A randomised controlled study of four-layer compression versus Unna’s boot for venous ulcers.J Wound Care2004;
13: 21–24.
18.
UkatAKonigMVanscheidtW, et al.
Short-stretch versus multilayer compression for venous leg ulcers: a comparison of healing rates.J Wound Care2003;
12: 139–143.
19.
MoffattCJO’HareL.Venous leg ulceration: treatment by high compression bandaging.Ostomy Wound Manage1995;
41: 16–18, 20, 22–25.
20.
WareJJrKosinskiMKellerSD.A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.Med Care1996;
34: 220–233.
21.
MarstonWAEnnisWJLantisJCII, et al.
Baseline factors affecting closure of venous leg ulcers.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2017;
5: 829–835.
22.
MilicDJZivicSSBogdanovicDC, et al.
Risk factors related to the failure of venous leg ulcers to heal with compression treatment.J Vasc Surg2009;
49: 1242–1247.
23.
KaranikolicVBinicIJovanovicD, et al. The effect of age and compression strength on venous leg ulcer healing. Phlebology. Epub ahead of print 22 December 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0268355517749112.
24.
ScottonMFMiotHAAbbadeLP.Factors that influence healing of chronic venous leg ulcers: a retrospective cohort.An Bras Dermatol2014;
89: 414–422.
25.
GuestJFFullerGWVowdenP.Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of three different compression systems in newly-diagnosed venous leg ulcers in the UK.J Wound Care2017;
26: 244–254.
26.
KappSMillerCDonohueL.The clinical effectiveness of two compression stocking treatments on venous leg ulcer recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Low Extrem Wounds2013;
12: 189–198.
27.
LazarethIMoffattCDissemondJ, et al.
Efficacy of two compression systems in the management of VLUs: results of a European RCT.J Wound Care2012;
21: 553–554, 556, 558.
28.
BlaiseS.Urgo K2: un nouveau système de compression bicouches pour le traitement des ulcères de jambe d’origine veineuse. Résultats de l’étude Odyssey.J Maladies Vasc2012;
37: 264.
29.
De CarvalhoMRPeixotoBUSilveiraIA, et al.
A meta-analysis to compare four-layer to short-stretch compression bandaging for venous leg ulcer healing. Ostomy Wound Manage2018;
64(5): 30–37.
30.
StensalALazarethIPasturelUM, et al. Compression therapy in 100 consecutive patientswith venous leg ulcers. J Maladies Vasc 2013; 38(4): 252–258.
31.
AshbyRLGabeRAliS, et al.
VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV) – compression hosiery compared with compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial, mixed-treatment comparison and decision-analytic model.Health Technol Assess2014;
18: 1–293, v–vi.
32.
AttalRMaheEBilanP, et al.
[Compression care for venous leg ulcers: assessment of medical practices in 100 patients].J Mal Vasc2015;
40: 158–164. [Mismatch]
33.
Clarke-MoloneyMKeaneNO'ConnorV, et al.
Randomised controlled trial comparing European standard class 1 to class 2 compression stockings for ulcer recurrence and patient compliance.Int Wound J2014;
11: 404–408.
34.
CataldoJLde GodoyJMde BarrosN.The use of compression stockings for venous disorders in Brazil.Phlebology2012;
27: 33–37.
35.
GuestJFVowdenKVowdenP.The health economic burden that acute and chronic wounds impose on an average clinical commissioning group/health board in the UK.J Wound Care2017;
26: 292–303.
36.
OnidaSDaviesAH.Predicted burden of venous disease.Phlebology2016;
31: 74–79.
