Compression bandaging remains the ‘gold standard’ intervention for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Numerous studies have investigated the effect of a large variety of compression bandaging techniques and materials on venous leg ulcer healing. However, the majority of these studies failed to monitor both actual bandage application pressures and the bandaging competency of participating clinicians. A series of literature searches to explore the methods, practices, recommendations and results of monitoring compression bandaging pressures in leg ulcer research trials were undertaken. This included investigating the reliability and validity of sub-bandage pressure monitors and the degree to which compression bandaging achieves the recommended sub-bandage pressure. The literature revealed inconsistencies regarding the monitoring of sub-bandage pressure and in sub-bandage pressures produced by clinicians. This creates difficulties when comparing study outcomes and attempting to develop evidence-based practice recommendations.
MoffattC.Variability of pressure provided by sustained compression.Int Wound J2008;
5: 259–265.
2.
CoullATolsonDMcIntoshJ.Class-3c compression bandaging for venous ulcers: comparison of spiral and figure-of-eight techniques.J Adv Nurs2006;
54: 274.
3.
FebenK.How effective is training in compression bandaging technique?Br J Commun Nurs2003;
8: 80–84.
4.
TaylorADTaylorRJSaidSS.Using a bandage pressure monitor as an aid in improving bandaging skills.J Wound Care1998;
7: 131–133.
5.
WellerCJolleyDWolfeR, et al.
Effect of elasticity on subbandage pressure of three layer tubular compression bandages in healthy volunteers: a RCT.J Wound Care2010;
19: 417, 420–423.
6.
WongIKYManMBLChanOSH, et al.
Comparison of the interface pressure and stiffness of four types of compression systems.J Wound Care2012;
21: 161–167.
7.
GohelMSBarwellJRTaylorM, et al.
Long term results of compression therapy alone versus compression plus surgery in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR): randomised controlled trial.Br Med J2007;
335: 83.
8.
PartschHClarkMBassezS, et al.
Measurement of lower leg compression in vivo: recommendations for the performance of measurements of interface pressure and stiffness.Dermatol Surg2006;
32: 224–233.
9.
KhaburiA. Pressure mapping of medical compression bandages used for venous leg ulcer treatment. PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, 2010, p.330.
10.
CallumMHaiartDFaroukM, et al.
Effect of time and posture on pressure profiles obtained by three different types of compression.Phlebology1991;
6: 79–84.
11.
LoganRAThomasSHardingEF, et al.
A comparison of sub-bandage pressure produced by experienced and inexperienced bandagers.J Wound Care1992;
1: 23–26.[Mismatch]
12.
NelsonEARuckleyCVBarbenelJC.Improvements in bandaging technique following training.J Wound Care1995;
4: 181–184.
13.
ReynoldsS.The impact of a bandage training programme.J Wound Care1999;
8: 55–60.
14.
PartschHMenzingerGBlazekV.Static and dynamic measurement of compression pressure. Front Comput Aid Visual Vasc Funct1997;
263: 145–152.
15.
StockportJCGroarkeLEllisonDA, et al.
Single-layer and multilayer bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.J Wound Care1997;
6: 485–488.
16.
DanielsenLMadsenMHenriksenL, et al.
Subbandage pressure measurements comparing a long-stretch with a short-stretch compression bandage. Acta Derm Venereol1998;
78: 201.
17.
WertheimDMelhuishJTrenaryK, et al. Assessment of forces associated with compression therapy under static and dynamic conditions. In: 18th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 31 October--3 November 1996, pp.173–174. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
18.
HafnerJBotonakisIBurgG.A comparison of multilayer bandage systems during rest, exercise, and over 2 days of wear time.Arch Dermatol2000;
136: 857–863.
19.
HafnerJLüthiWHänssleH, et al.
Instruction of compression therapy by means of interface pressure measurement.Dermatol Surg2000;
26: 481–488.
20.
HäfnerHMPicheEJüngerM.The ratio of working pressure to resting pressure under compression stockings: its significance for the improvement of venous perfusion in the legs.Phlebologie2001;
30: 88–93.
21.
DaleJJRuckleyCVGibsonB, et al.
Multi-layer compression: comparison of four different four-layer bandage systems applied to the leg.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2004;
27: 94–99.
22.
LarsenAMFuttrupI.Watch the pressure – it drops!EWMA J2004;
4: 8–12
23.
PartschH.The static stiffness index: a simple method to assess the elastic property of compression material in vivo.Dermatol Surg2005;
31: 625–630.
24.
LeeAJDaleJJRuckleyCV, et al.
Compression therapy: effects of posture and application techniques on initial pressures delivered by bandages of different physical properties.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006;
31: 542–552.
25.
SatpathyAHayesSDoddsSR.Measuring sub-bandage pressure: comparing the use of pressure monitors and pulse oximeters.J Wound Care2006;
15: 125.
26.
MostiGBMattalianoV.Simultaneous changes of leg circumference and interface pressure under different compression bandages.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2007;
33: 476–482.
27.
BenigniJUhlJCornu-ThénardA, et al.
Compression bandages: influence of techniques of use on their clinical efficiency and tolerance. Int Angiol2008;
27: 68–73.
28.
DamstraRJBrouwerERPartschH.Controlled, comparative study of relation between volume changes and interface pressure under short‐stretch bandages in leg lymphedema patients.Dermatol Surg2008;
34: 773–779.
29.
HiraiMIwataHIshibashiH, et al.
Interface pressure and stiffness of various elastic stockings during posture changes and exercise.Vascular2008;
16: 95.
30.
KellerAMüllerMLCalowT, et al.
Bandage pressure measurement and training: simple interventions to improve efficacy in compression bandaging.Int Wound J2009;
6: 324–330.
31.
CaseyVMcAreeBMoloneyM, et al. Wearable sub-bandage pressure measurement system. In: Sensor applications symposium, Limerick, Ireland, 23--25 February 2010, pp.41–45. Instituter of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
32.
MilicDJZivicSSBogdanovicDC, et al.
The influence of different sub-bandage pressure values on venous leg ulcers healing when treated with compression therapy.J Vasc Surg2010;
51: 655–661.
33.
HowseL. Determining the effectiveness of inelastic short stretch bandages in sustaining subbandage graduated compression. Masters of Philosophy Thesis, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Australia, 2011.
34.
WongIKYAndriessenALeeDTF, et al.
Randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcome of two compression bandaging systems and standard care without compression in patients with venous leg ulcers.J Vasc Surg2012;
55: 1376–1385.
35.
ProtzKHeyerKDorlerM, et al.
Compression therapy: scientific background and practical applications.J German Soc Dermatol2014;
12: 794–801.
36.
RimaudDConvertRCalmelsP.In vivo measurement of compression bandage interface pressures: the first study.Ann Phys Rehab Med2014;
57: 394–408.
37.
ZarchiKJemecG.Delivery of compression therapy for venous leg ulcers.JAMA Dermatol2014;
150: 730.
38.
WangDH-CBlenmanNMaunderS, et al.
An optical fiber Bragg grating force sensor for monitoring sub-bandage pressure during compression therapy.Opt Exp2013;
21: 19799–19807.
39.
FongKDHuDEichstadtS, et al.
The SNaP system: biomechanical and animal model testing of a novel ultraportable negative-pressure wound therapy system.Plast Reconstruct Surg2010;
125: 1362–1371.
40.
FinnieA.Interface pressure measurements in leg ulcer management. Br J Nurs2000;
9: S8–S14.
41.
PartschHMostiG.Comparison of three portable instruments to measure compression pressure. Int Angiol2010;
29: 426.
42.
LattimerCRAzzamMKalodikiEMakrisGCGeroulakosG.Compression stockings significantly improve hemodynamic performance in post-thrombotic syndrome irrespective of class or length.J VascSurg2013;
58: 158–165.
43.
PartschH.Evidence based compression therapy.J Vasc Med2003;
32: 1–39.
44.
PartschH.The use of pressure change on standing as a surrogate measure of the stiffness of a compression bandage.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2005;
30: 415–421.
45.
ProtzKHeyerKVerheyen-CronauI, et al.
Loss of interface pressure in various compression bandage systems over seven days.Dermatology2014;
229: 343–352.
46.
SchollumM. Sustaining clinical competency in compression bandaging for nurses working in the community. Master of Health Science Thesis, School of Health Care Practice, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand, 2014.
47.
PartschHClarkMMostiG, et al.
Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects.Dermatol Surg2008;
34: 600–609.
48.
JüngerMLadwigABohbotS, et al.
Comparison of interface pressures of three compression bandaging systems used on healthy volunteers.J Wound Care2009;
18: 474–476.
49.
WienertVHansenR.Anmersen von medizinischen Kompressions-strumpfen am leigenden oder am stenhenden Patienten?Phlebologie1992;
21: 236–238.
MoffattCJMcCullaghLO'ConnorT, et al.
Randomized trial of four-layer and two-layer bandage systems in the management of chronic venous ulceration.Wound Repair Regenerat2003;
11: 166–171.
52.
Australian Wound ManagementAssociation Inc. & New Zealand Wound Care Society. Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline for prevention and management of venous leg ulcers.
Osborne Park, W. Australia:
Cambridge Publishing, 2011, p.132.
53.
MostiGIabichellaMLPartschH.Compression therapy in mixed ulcers increases venous output and arterial perfusion. J Vasc Surg2012;
55(1): 122–128.
54.
MostiGMattalianoVPartschH.Inelastic compression increases venous ejection fraction more than elastic bandages in patients with superficial venous reflux.Phlebology2008;
23: 287.
55.
PartschH.Compression for the management of venous leg ulcers: which material do we have?Phlebology2014;
29: 140–145.
56.
MostiGMattalianoVPartschH.Influence of different materials in multicomponent bandages on pressure and stiffness of the final bandage.Dermatol Surg2008;
34: 631–639.
