Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) – one of the most frequently recommended methods for treating great saphenous vein incompetence – is easy and inexpensive. However, it achieves a lower occlusion rate compared to endovenous thermal ablation. The application of UGFS to pre-terminal great saphenous vein interruption, eliminating the saphenous stem wash out effect, enhances the short-term occlusion rate. This study explores the results of this technique at 12 months.

Method

Thirty great saphenous veins (28 patients) with junction incompetence, with calibres >6 mm and >30 cm reflux stem length were submitted to echo-guided pre-terminal great saphenous vein interruption and foam great saphenous vein occlusion. Participants were subjected to a 12-month post-operative review by ultrasound assessment of great saphenous vein occlusion and terminal stump stability. Comparisons were made between pre-operative and 12-month Validation of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), photopletismography, Aberdeen questionnaire and complications.

Results

After 12 months, 28/30 great saphenous veins remained occluded (93%). One complete and one partial recanalization did not require retreatment. Four saphenous stumps showed a reflux during Valsalva (one due to recanalization, one limited to the stump, two with reflux in the anterior accessory saphenous vein). VCSS improved from 3.33 ± 1.64 to 0.67 ± 1.21 (p < 0.05). Aberdeen questionnaire scores decreased from 9.44 ± 6.18 to 2.47 ± 3.77 (p < 0.05). For photopletismographic examination, the mean venous refilling time (normal value: > 25 s) improved from 17.94 ± 11.97 to 31.4 ± 11.99 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Applying pre-terminal great saphenous vein interruption to UGFS of the saphenous stem achieved an occlusion rate at one year similar to that of endovenous thermal ablation. The procedure is simple, effective, office based, and may be used as a 10-min prolongation to a phlebectomy.

Keywords

Foam sclerotherapy great saphenous vein occlusion great saphenous vein pre-terminal interruption office treatment ultrasound-guided procedure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bootun

Lane

Davies

. The advent of non-thermal, non-tumescent techniques for treatment of varicose veins. Phlebology 2016; 31: 5–14.

van Eekeren

RJPR

Boersmab

deVriesb

J-PPM

et al.

Update of endovenous treatment modalities for insufficient saphenous veins – a review of literature. Semin Vasc Surg 2014; 27: 118–136.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Varicose veins in the legs: the diagnosis and management of varicose veins. 2013. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance CG168/chapter/introduction (accessed 5 September 2014).

Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs – guidelines according to scientific evidence. Int Angiol 2014; 33: 87–208.

Gloviczki

Comerota

Dalsing

et al.

The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 2Se48S–2Se48S.

Nicolaides

Kakkos

Eklof

et al.

Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs. Guidelines according to scientific evidence. Int Angiol 2014; 33: 87e208–87e208.

Wittens C, Davies AH, Bækgaard N, et al. Management of chronic venous disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 678–737.

Biemans

Kockaert

Akkersdijk

et al.

Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58: 727–34(e1).

Rasmussen

Lawaetz

Bjoern

et al.

Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1079–1087.

10.

van der Velden

Biemans

De Maeseneer

et al.

Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 1184–1194.

11.

Brittenden

Cotton

Elders

et al.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation and surgery for varicose veins: results from the Comparison of LAser, Surgery and foam Sclerotherapy (CLASS) randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 2015; 19: 1–342.

12.

Marsden

Perry

Bradbury

et al.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of surgery, endothermal ablation, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and compression stockings for symptomatic varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50: 794–801.

13.

Parsi

. Catheter-directed sclerotherapy. Phlebology 2009; 24: 98–107.

14.

Cavezzi

Di Paolo

Campana

et al.

Peri-saphenous tumescence infiltration in long catheter foam sclerotherapy of great saphenous vein combined with phlebectomy of varicose tributaries: any benefit?

Phlebology 2012; 27: 323–323.

15.

Cavezzi

Mosti

Di Paolo

et al.

Ultrasound-guided peri-saphenous tumescence infiltration improves the outcomes of long catheter foam sclerotherapy combined with phlebectomy of the varicose tributaries. Veins Lymphatics 2015; 4: 18–23.

16.

Devereux

Recke

Westermann

et al.

Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy of great saphenous veins in combination with pre-treatment reduction of the diameter employing the principals of perivenous tumescent local anesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 187–195.

17.

Fattahi

. Foam washout sclerotherapy: a new technique geared toward reducing short- and long-term complications of regular foam sclerotherapy and comparison with existing foam sclerotherapy method. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2013; 1: 111–112.

18.

Ferrara

. Sclerotherapy of varicose veins: my method (HSC). Minerva Cardioangiol 2012; 60: 125–131.

19.

Milleret

Garendau

. Sclérose des grandes veines saphènes à la mousse délivrée par cathéter écho-guidé sur veine vide: alpha-technique. Bilan des 1.000 premiers traitements. Phlebologie 2006; 59: 53–58.

20.

Kim PS, Bishawi M, Draughn D, et al. Mechanochemical ablation for symptomatic great saphenous vein reflux: a two-year follow-up. Phlebology. 2017; 32: 43–48.

21.

van Eekeren

RRJP

Boersma

Holewijn

et al.

Mechanochemical endovenous ablation for the treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2014; 2: 282–288.

22.

Frullini

Fortuna

. Laser assisted foam sclerotherapy (LAFOS): a new approach to the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. Phlébologie 2013; 66: 51–54.

23.

Abela

Liamis

Prionidis

et al.

Reverse foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein and sapheno-femoral ligation compared to standard and invagination stripping: a prospective clinical series. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36: 485–490.

24.

Boutouroglou

Azzam

Kakkos

et al.

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy combined with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to surgical treatment of varicose veins: early results of a randomized control trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31: 93–100.

25.

Liu

Jia

Guo

et al.

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to standard stripping: a prospective clinical study. Int Angiol 2011; 30: 321–326.

26.

Kalodiki

Lattimer

Azzam

et al.

Long term results of a randomized controlled trial on ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy combined with sapheno femoral ligation versus standard surgery for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 451–452.

27.

Ricci

Moro

Antonelli Incalzi

. Ultrasound assisted great saphenous vein ligation and division: an office procedure. Vein Lymphat 2014; 3: 42–46.

28.

Eklöf

Rutherford

Bergan

et al.

Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus treatment. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 1248–1252.

29.

Ricci S, Moro L, Ferrini A, et al. The E point: a new echographic great saphenous identification sign in specific anatomical variants and applications. Phlebology. 2017; 32: 120–124.

30.

De Maeseneer

Pichot

Cavezzi

et al.

Union Internationale de Phlebologie. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins of the lower limbs after treatment for varicose veins – UIP consensus document. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 89–102.

31.

Williamsson

Danielsson

Smith

. Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy for insufficiency of the great saphenous vein: occlusion rates and patient satisfaction after one year. Phlebology 2013; 28: 80–85.

32.

Asciutto

Lindblad

. Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. Vasa 2012; 41: 120–124.

33.

Boersma

vanEekeren

Werson

et al.

Mechano chemical endovenous ablation of small saphenous vein insufficiency using the ClariVeins device: one-year results of a prospective series. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 45: 299–303.

34.

Coleridge Smith

. Chronic venous disease treated by ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32: 577–583.

35.

Cavezzi

Frullini

Ricci

et al.

Treatment of varicose veins by foam sclerotherapy: two clinical series. Phlebology 2002; 17: 13–18.

36.

De Maeseneer

Pichot

Cavezzi

et al.

Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins of the lower limbs after treatment for varicose veins UIP Consensus Document. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 89–102.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

0.22 MB

Foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein in association with pre-terminal saphenous junction ligation/division as an office-based procedure: 12-Month results

Abstract

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material