One-year results of the use of endovenous radiofrequency ablation utilising an optimised radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy protocol for the treatment of truncal superficial venous reflux

Abstract

Background

In previous in vitro and ex vivo studies, we have shown increased thermal spread can be achieved with radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy when using a low power and slower, discontinuous pullback. We aimed to determine the clinical success rate of radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy using this optimised protocol for the treatment of superficial venous reflux in truncal veins.

Methods

Sixty-three patients were treated with radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy using the optimised protocol and were followed up after one year (mean 16.3 months). Thirty-five patients returned for audit, giving a response rate of 56%. Duplex ultrasonography was employed to check for truncal reflux and compared to initial scans.

Results

In the 35 patients studied, there were 48 legs, with 64 truncal veins treated by radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (34 great saphenous, 15 small saphenous and 15 anterior accessory saphenous veins). One year post-treatment, complete closure of all previously refluxing truncal veins was demonstrated on ultrasound, giving a success rate of 100%.

Conclusions

Using a previously reported optimised, low power/slow pullback radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy protocol, we have shown it is possible to achieve a 100% ablation at one year. This compares favourably with results reported at one year post-procedure using the high power/fast pullback protocols that are currently recommended for this device.

Keywords

Anterior accessory saphenous vein great saphenous vein radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy small saphenous vein varicose veins venous reflux

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) clinical guidelines – CG 168. Varicose veins in the legs: the diagnosis and management of varicose veins, http://publications.nice.org.uk/varicose-veins-in-the-legs-cg168 (July 2013, accessed 23 September 2015).

Rautio

Ohinmaa

Perälä

et al.

Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 958–965.

Proebstle

Vago

Alm

et al.

Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 151–156.

Kianifard

Holdstock

Whiteley

. Radiofrequency ablation (VNUS closure®) does not cause neovascularisation at the groin at one year: results of a case controlled study. Surgeon 2006; 4: 71–74.

Fassiadis

Kianifard

Holdstock

et al.

A novel endoluminal technique for varicose vein management: the VNUS closure. Phlebology 2002; 16: 145–148.

Marsh

Price

Holdstock

et al.

One-year outcomes of radiofrequency ablation of incompetent perforator veins using the radiofrequency stylet device. Phlebology 2010; 25: 79–84.

Whiteley

Holdstock

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablations of varicose veins (VNUS closure). In: Roger

Greenhalgh

(eds). Vascular and endovascular challenges, London: Biba Publishing, 2004, pp. 361–381.

Whiteley

Is all heat the same and does catheter design matter? In: Greenhalgh

(ed). Vascular and endovascular controversies update, London: Biba Publishing, 2014, pp. 331–336.

Badham

Strong

Whiteley

. An in vitro study to optimise treatment of varicose veins with radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy. Phlebology 2015; 30: 17–23.

10.

Reich-Schupke

Mumme

Stücker

. Histopathological findings in varicose veins following bipolar radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy—results of an ex vivo experiment. Phlebology 2011; 26: 69–74.

11.

Camci

Harnoss

Akkersdijk

et al.

Effectiveness and tolerability of bipolar radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. Phlebologie 2009; 38: 5–11.

12.

Braithwaite

Hnatek

Zierau

et al.

Radiofrequency-induced thermal therapy: results of a European multicentre study of a resistive ablation of incompetent truncal varicose veins. Phlebology 2013; 28: 38–46.

13.

Tessman

Thierbach

Dietrich

et al.

Radiofrequency induced thermotherapy (RFiTT) of varicose veins compared to endovenous laser treatment (EVLT): a non-randomized prospective study concentrating on occlusion rates, side-effects and clinical outcome. Eur J Dermatol 2011; 21: 945–951.

14.

Newman

Meecham

Walker

et al.

Optimising treatment parameters for radiofrequency induced thermal therapy (RFiTT): a comparison of the manufacturer’s treatment guidance with a locally developed treatment protocol. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 664–669.

15.

Badham GE, Dos Santos SJ and Whiteley MS. Radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (RFiTT) in a porcine liver model and ex vivo great saphenous vein. Minim Invasive Therapy Allied Technol 2017; 2: 1–7. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1282520.

16.

Kianifard

Holdstock

Allen

et al.

Randomized clinical trial of the effect of adding subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery to standard great saphenous vein stripping. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1075–1080.

17.

Bacon

Dinneen

Marsh

et al.

Five-year results of incompetent perforator vein closure using TRans-luminal occlusion of perforator. Phlebology 2009; 24: 74–78.

18.

Vuylsteke

Van Dorpe

Roelens

et al.

Intraluminal fibre-tip centring can improve endovenous laser ablation: a histological study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 110–116.

19.

Malskat

WSJ

Poluektova

van der Geld

CWM

et al.

Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA): a review of mechanisms, modelling outcomes and issues for debate. Lasers Med Sci 2014; 29: 393–403.

20.

Thomis

Verbrugghe

Milleret

et al.

Steam ablation versus radiofrequency and laser ablation: an in vivo histological comparative trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 46: 378–382.

21.

Alur

Dodurga

Günes

et al.

Effects of endovenous laser ablation on vascular tissue: molecular genetics approach. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 11043–11047.

22.

Boon

Akkersdijk

GJM

Nio

. Percutaneous treatment of varicose veins with bipolar radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 43–47.

23.

Proebstle

Moehler

Gül

. Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1,320 nm Nd: YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 1678–1684.

24.

Häcker

Vallo

Weiss

et al.

Technical characterization of a new bipolar and multipolar radiofrequency device for minimally invasive treatment of renal tumors. BJU Int 2006; 97: 822–828.

25.

Iafrati

Pare

O’Donnell

et al.

Is the nihilistic approach to surgical reduction of superficial and perforator vein incompetence for venous ulcer justified?

J Vasc Surg 2002; 36: 1167–1174.

26.

Iafrati

Welch

O’Donnell

. Subfascial endoscopic perforator ligation: an analysis of early clinical outcomes and cost. J Vasc Surg 1997; 25: 995–1001.

27.

Whiteley

O’Donnell

. Debate: whether venous perforator surgery reduces recurrences. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60: 796–803.

28.

Whiteley

Price

Scott

et al.

Radiofrequency ablation of refluxing great saphenous systems, Giacomini veins, and incompetent perforating veins using VNUS closure and TRLOP technique. Phlebology 2003; 18: 52–52.