Changes in the rate of prophylactic vena cava filter insertion at a university hospital *

Abstract

Objective

We previously demonstrated a high rate of prophylactic vena cava filter (VCF) insertion at our institution. We have since attempted to restrict the use of VCF to indications supported by Level-I evidence. This study was designed to evaluate the success of our interventions.

Methods

All patients receiving VCF between 2007–2009 and 2012–2014 at a university hospital were reviewed. After assessing the use of VCF in the first period, a meeting was convened among the Departments of Radiology, Vascular Surgery and Trauma. Policy was implemented to avoid the inappropriate use of VCF. Data were prospectively collected in the second period to assess the effect of our intervention.

Results

There were 156 VCF placed from 2012 to 2014. VCF was absolutely indicated in 84% of cases, relatively indicated in 9% and prophylactic in 7%. These data contrast our previous experience from 2007 to 2009. In the earlier series, a total of 244 filters were placed, in which 54% of patients had an absolute indication, 14% relative, and 32% prophylactic. There was a significant decrease in filters placed for pure prophylaxis: whereas 76 prophylactic filters were placed between 2007 and 2009, only 11 were placed between 2012 and 2014 (p < 0.0001). No significant differences existed for relatively indicated filters. The department of trauma and surgical critical care (TSCC) observed the most dramatic change in practice. TSCC placed 61 prophylactic VCF between 2007 and 2009 (57% of all filters placed by the department), and 4 prophylactic VCF from 2012 to 2014 (15% of filters placed by TSCC) (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate a significant change in the attitudes regarding prophylactic VCF insertion between the two periods of study. Further investigations must be performed to assess changes in clinical outcomes that may result from the altered practice at our university.

Keywords

Venous thromboembolism management venous thromboembolism prophylaxis venous thromboembolism temporary caval filter pulmonary embolism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aryafar

Kinney

. Optional inferior vena cava filters in the trauma patient. Semin Intervent Radiol 2010; 27: 68–80.

Sobieraj

Coleman

Tongbram

. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, Rockville, MD: University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center Hartford Connecticut, 2012.

Wang

Lloyd

. Clinical review: Inferior vena cava filters in the age of patient-centered outcomes. Ann Med 2013; 45: 474–481.

Stein

Matta

Hull

. Increasing use of vena cava filters for prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2011; 124: 655–661.

Meisner

Labropoulos

Gasparis

. Review of indications and practices of vena caval filters at a large university hospital. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 46: 21–25.

Rutherford

. Prophylactic Indications for vena cava filters: Critical appraisal. Semin Vasc Surg 2005; 18: 158–165.

Kearon

Kahn

Agnelli

American College of Chest Physicians . Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 454S–545S.

Geerts

Bergqvist

Pineo

. American College of Chest Physicians. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 381S–453S.

Rogers

Cipolle

Velmahos

. Management of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. EAST Practice Management guidelines. J Trauma 2002; 53: 142–164.

10.

Gasparis

Spentzouris

Meisner

. Improving retrieval rates of temporary inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 34S–38S.

11.

Velmahos

Kern

Chan

. Prevention of venous thromboembolism after injury: An evidence-based report; part II. Analysis of risk factors and evaluation of the role of vena caval filters. J Trauma 2000; 49: 140–144.

12.

McMurty

Owings

Anderson

. Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 314–320.

13.

PREPIC study group. Eight year follow up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2005; 112: 416–422.

14.

Singh

Lai

Lerner

. Guidelines and the use of inferior vena cava filters: A review of an institutional experience. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7: 65–71.

15.

Birkmeyer

Baser

. Preoperative placement of inferior vena cava filters and outcomes after gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 313–318.

16.

Rajasekhar

Crowther

. Inferior vena caval filter insertion prior to bariatric surgery: A systematic review of the literature. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 1266–1270.

17.

Hammond

Bakshi

Currie

. Audit of the use of IVC filters in the UK: Experience from three centres over 12 years. Clin Radiol 2009; 64: 502–510.

18.

Decousus

Leizorovicz

Parent

. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 409–415.