Failed inferior vena cava filter retrieval by conventional method: Analysis of its causes and retrieval of it by modified double-loop technique

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the complications of the temporary implanted inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and the feasibility of double-loop technique for removal of complicated IVC filters.

Methods

From January 2012 to December 2013, a total of 25 patients with IVC filter were referred for IVC filter retrieval. There were 20 Celect®, 3 OptEase®, and 2 Günther-Tulip® filters. All of the patients were evaluated with a pre-procedural CT scan to identify any complications. The IVC filters which had failed to be retrieved by the conventional method were evaluated, and retrieval was attempted with double loop technique.

Results

Sixteen of 25 (64%) filters had complications; IVC wall penetration (n = 11, 44%), tilted within IVC (n = 6, 24%), embedded struts (n = 3, 12%), and fracture of the strut (n = 1, 4%). The complications were overlapped in five patients. Two of them (8%) had also complained of filter-related pain. The success rate of IVC filter retrieval by double-loop technique was 14/16 (87.5%). There was no major filter retrieval-related complications.

Conclusions

The double-loop technique is a safe and feasible method for complicated IVC filter retrieval.

Keywords

Inferior vena cava filters complicated inferior vena cava filter inferior vena cava filter penetration tilted inferior vena cava filter filter retrieval

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Corriere

Sauve

Ayerdi

. Vena cava filters and inferior vena cava thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 789–794.

Miyahara

Miyata

Shigematsu

. Clinical outcome and complications of temporary inferior vena cava filter placement. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 620–624.

Gasparis

Spentzouris

Meisner

. Improving retrieval rates of temporary inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54(6 Suppl): 34S–38S.

Minocha

Idakoji

Riaz

. Improving inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates: Impact of a dedicated inferior vena cava filter clinic. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: 1847–1851.

Caplin

Nikolic

Kalva

. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22: 1499–1506.

Millward

Grassi

Kinney

. Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. Reporting standards for inferior vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up: Supplement for temporary and retrievable/optional filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20(7 Suppl): S374–376.

Kaufman

Kinney

Streiff

. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: Report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 449–459.

Rosenthal

Wellons

Hancock

. Retrievability of the Günther Tulip vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days in patients with multiple trauma. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 114: 406–410.

Keller-Biehl

Starr

. Penetration of the inferior vena cava and adjacent organs after filter placement is common and associated with temporary filter type and length of time in place. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58: 1433–1434.

10.

United States Food and Drug Administration. Alerts and notices (medical devices) removing retrievable inferior vena cava filters: initial communication, http://wwww.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm221707htm.

11.

Dinglasan

Schmitt

. Complicated inferior vena cava filter retrievals: associated factors identified at preretrieval CT. Radiology 2013; 266: 347–354.

12.

Kuo

Bostaph

Loh

. Retrieval of trapped Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filters: Snare-over-guide wire loop technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17(11 Pt 1): 1845–1849.

13.

Rubenstein

Chun

Chew

. Loop-snare technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrievals. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18: 1315–1318.

14.

Stavropoulos

Dixon

Burke

. Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: Use of endobronchial forceps. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 1297–1301.

15.

Yan

Galfoione

Stavropoulos

. Forceps retrieval of a tip-embedded superior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: 592–595.

16.

Lynch

. Balloon-assisted removal of tilted inferior vena cava filters with embedded tips. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20: 1210–1214.

17.

Foley

Nathan

Wang

. A “fall-back” technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrieval. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56: 1629–1633.

18.

Singh

Marco

Sandhu

. A novel technique to remove inferior vena cava filters using a homemade snare device. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56: 1821–1821.

19.

Kuo

Odegaard

Rosenberg

. Excimer laser-assisted removal of embedded inferior vena cava filters: A single-center prospective study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 560–566.

20.

Ray

Jr Mitchell

Zipser

. Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: A multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 1595–1604.

21.

Iliescu

Haskal

. Advanced techniques for removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35: 741–750.

22.

Sadaf

Rasuli

Olivier

. Significant caval penetration by the Celect inferior vena cava filter: attributable to filter design? J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18: 1447–1450.

23.

Zhou

Spain

Moon

. Retrospective review of 120 Celect inferior vena cava filter retrievals: Experience at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23: 1557–1563.

24.

Durack

Westphalen

Kekulawela

. Perforation of the IVC: Rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Günther-Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35: 299–308.

25.

Rimon

Bensaid

Golan

. Optease vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 532–535.

26.

Kuo

Robertson

Odegaard

. Complex retrieval of fractured, embedded, and penetrating inferior vena cava filters: A prospective study with histologic and electron microscopic analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: 622–630.