Abstract
Introduction
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) is a lifesaving intervention for in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, severe aortic regurgitation (AR) has traditionally been considered an absolute contraindication for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO).
Case report
A 63-year-old man with aortic regurgitation experienced IHCA with 50 min of low-flow time. The patient received ECPR and emergent valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) through a rapid multidisciplinary approach. Despite transient focal neurological symptoms in the early post-resuscitation period, the patient steadily recovered and was discharged with a favourable Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) of 2.
Discussion
This case challenges the absolute contraindication of severe aortic regurgitation for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) and ECPR candidacy, demonstrating that a multidisciplinary approach with planned venting strategies and rapid definitive intervention can lead to satisfactory patient outcomes.
Conclusion
Severe aortic regurgitation may not absolutely preclude candidacy for peripheral V-A ECMO. A pre-emptive approach integrating detailed venting strategies with emergent transcatheter interventions expands the salvageable population with valvular heart disease.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
