BalsamLBReyentovichASonAYDeAndaAJ. Management of the in situ HeartMate II left ventricular assist device during non-transplant, non-exchange cardiac reoperations. Perfusion2016; 31: 465–470.
2.
FaggionCMJ. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer. Br Dent J2016; 220: 167–168.
3.
AllisonDBBrownAWGeorgeBJKaiserKA. Reproducibility: a tragedy of errors. Nature2016; 530: 27–29.
4.
Teixeira da SilvaJADobranszkiJ. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. Account Res2015; 22: 22–40.
5.
WalkerRRocha da SilvaP. Emerging trends in peer review - a survey. Front Neurosci2015; 9: 169.
6.
Getting closer to a fully correctable and connected research literature. PLoS Med2013; 10: e1001408.
7.
HunterJ. Post-publication peer review: opening up scientific conversation. Front Comput Neurosci2012; 6: 63.
