Variation in duplex peak systolic velocity measurement in a multi-site vascular service

Abstract

Objective:

Duplex US (DUS) is increasingly utilised as a first-line investigation for the assessment of carotid disease. For clinical decision-making, DUS assessment must be accurate and reproducible to ensure reliability. We aimed to investigate the variability in peak systolic velocity (PSV) measurement in a multi-site vascular network.

Methods:

DUS measurements of PSV were taken from continuous and pulsatile flow, generated by a high fidelity phantom, by 12 experienced vascular scientists across four hospitals. Participants were blinded to the actual PSV value (50 cm/s).

Results:

We observed an average error of 13.2% (± 8.3) and 11.6% (± 7.5) in PSV measurements taken from pulsatile and continuous waveforms, respectively. Measurements of PSV using the pulsatile waveform demonstrated statistically significant variation across all hospitals; ((hospital/mean) A 43.9 cm/s, B 61.7 cm/s, C 57.4 cm/s, D 47.7 cm/s, p=0.001). Further analysis demonstrated statistically significant variation in 4 instrumentation-related factors when measuring from a pulsatile waveform (Doppler angle, angle of insonation, velocity range, scale range).

Conclusion:

We observed a significant level of error and variation in PSV measurements across four sites within our vascular network. Variation in instrumentation-related factors may be accountable for this. In light of the centralisation of vascular services, it is increasingly important to unify and implement scanning protocols in order to reduce error and inter-site variability.

Keywords

duplex ultrasound carotid vascular diagnostics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sensier

Hartshorne

Thrush

Nydahl

Bolia

London

. A prospective comparison of lower limb colour-coded Duplex scanning with arteriography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 11: 170–175.

Katsamouris

Giannoukas

Tsetis

Kostas

Petinarakis

Gourtsoyiannis

. Can ultrasound replace arteriography in the management of chronic arterial occlusive disease of the lower limb? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 21: 155–159.

Franz

Jump

Spalding

Jenkins

. Accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in estimation of severity of peripheral vascular disease. Int J Angiol 2013; 22: 155–158.

Eiberg

Grønvall Rasmussen

Hansen

Schroeder

. Duplex ultrasound scanning of peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 507–512.

Nederkoorn

van der Graaf

Hunink

MGM

. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke 2003; 34: 1324–1332.

Tessler

Kimme-Smith

Sutherland

Schiller

Perrella

Grant

. Inter- and intra-observer variability of Doppler peak velocity measurements: an in-vitro study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16: 653–657.

Hussain

Smith

Wood

RFM

Bland

. Observer variability in volumetric blood flow measurements in leg arteries using duplex ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22: 287–291.

Winter-Warnars

van der Graaf

Mali

. Interobserver variation in duplex sonographic scanning in the femoropopliteal tract. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 421–428; discussion 329–330.

Ubbink

Fidler

Legemate

. Interobserver variability in aortoiliac and femoropopliteal duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33: 540–545.

10.

Whyman

Hoskins

Leng

. Accuracy and reproducibility of duplex ultrasound imaging in a phantom model of femoral artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17: 524–530.

11.

Kohler

Langlois

Roederer

. Variability in measurement of specific parameters for carotid duplex examination. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987; 13: 637–642.

12.

Bandyk

. Interpretation pitfalls of vascular laboratory testing. Semin Vasc Surg 2013; 26: 67–71.

13.

Grant

Benson

Moneta

. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis–Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 2003; 229: 340–346.

14.

Logason

Bärlin

Jonsson

Boström

Hårdemark

Karacagil

. The importance of Doppler angle of insonation on differentiation between 50–69% and 70–99% carotid artery stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 21: 311–313.

15.

Steinman

Tavakkoli

Myers

Cobbold

Johnston

. Sources of error in maximum velocity estimation using linear phased-array Doppler systems with steady flow. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 655–664.

16.

Byrd

Robless

Baxter

Emson

Halliday

. Carotid duplex ultrasonography: importance of standardisation. Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborators and Vascular Laboratories. Int Angiol 1998; 17: 248–254.

17.

Zierler

Beach

Bergelin

. Agreement between site-reported and ultrasound core laboratory results for duplex ultrasound velocity measurements in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 2–7.

18.

Hoyt

Hester

Bell

Lockhart

Robbin

. Accuracy of volumetric flow rate measurements: an in vitro study using modern ultrasound scanners. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 1511–1518.

19.

Johri

Picard

Newell

Marshall

King

MEE

Hung

. Can a teaching intervention reduce interobserver variability in LVEF assessment: a quality control exercise in the echocardiography lab. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 821–829.

20.

Zoli

Merkel

Sabbà

. Interobserver and inter-equipment variability of echo-Doppler sonographic evaluation of the superior mesenteric artery. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 99–106.

21.

Thavendiranathan

Popović

Flamm

Dahiya

Grimm

Marwick

. Improved interobserver variability and accuracy of echocardiographic visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment through a self-directed learning program using cardiac magnetic resonance images. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26: 1267–1273.

22.

Sacerdoti

Gaiani

Buonamico

. Interobserver and interequipment variability of hepatic, splenic, and renal arterial Doppler resistance indices in normal subjects and patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1997; 27: 986–992.