Continous quality improvement of perfusion practice: the role of electronic data collection and statistical control charts

Abstract

In-hospital data collection may be used to improve the selection, operative techniques, and process of care for cardiac surgical patients. The aim of this report is to demonstrate the influence of the automated generation of quality indicators (QI) for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the implementation of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) programme on the CPB process of care. Adult patients undergoing CPB were divided into three consecutive groups: Group 1 (n=363); no QI data feedback, Group 2 (n = 253); automated QI data feedback alone, and Group 3 (n = 363) data feedback and implementation of CQI. There were no significant differences in demographic, procedural or clinical outcomes for each group. Significant improvement, as determined by adherence to practice protocols and reduction in practice variation, was observed for cardiac index < 1.6 L/min/m² (min), mean arterial pressure < 40 mmHg (min), venous saturation < 60% (min), arterial blood temperature of > 37.5⁰C (min), minimum pCO₂ (mmHg), maximum pCO₂ (mmHg), and minimum pO₂ (mmHg). There was no change in the minimum haemoglobin (g/dl) on bypass. Automated generation of QI resulted in improved adherence to process of care guidelines, highlighting the potential of electronic data collection. This technique is optimised in a CQI programme, utilising statistical control charts for data interpretation.

Keywords

electronic data management extracorporeal support quality control quality indicator

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Shahian DM Edwards FH Ferraris VA . Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: Part 1—conceptual framework and measure selection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 3–12.

2 Doran T Fullwood C Gravelle H . Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 375–384.

3 Dickinson T Riley J Zabetkis PM . External validation of compliance to perfusion quality indicators. Perfusion 2004; 19: 295–299.

4 Brush JE Balakrishnan SA Brough J . Implementation of a continuous quality improvement program for percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac surgery at a large community hospital. Am Heart J 2006; 152(2): 379–385.

5 Ottens J Baker RA Newland RF Mazzone A . The future of the perfusion record: automated data collection vs. manual recording. J Extra Corpor Technol 2005; 37(4): 355–359.

6 Newland RF Baker RA Stanley R . Electronic data processing: the pathway to automated quality control of cardiopulmonary bypass. JECT 2006; 38: 139–143.

7 Hollenburg JP Pirraglia PA Williams-Russo P . Computerised data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison to the hand-written record. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997; 11(5): 545–551.

8 Parachoor SB; Rosow E; Enderle JD; . Knowledge management system for benchmarking performance indicators using statistical process control (SPC) and virtual instrumentation (VI). Biomed Sci Instrum 2003; 39: 175–178 (ISSN: 0067-8856).

9 Groom R Likosky DS Rutberg H . Understanding variation in cardiopulmonary bypass: statistical process control theory. JECT 2004; 36: 224–230.

10.

10 Potger KC McMillan D Southwell J Dando H O’Shaughnessy K . Membrane oxygenator exhaust capnography for continuously estimating arterial carbon dioxide tension during cardiopulmonary bypass. JECT 2003; 35: 218–223.

11.

11 Dickinson T Riley J Steg A Zabetakis P . Observations from a national multiple institution autotransfusion (ATS) quality indicator program. JECT 2004; 36: 153–157.

12.

12 Shann KG Likosky DS Murkin JM . An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: a focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 132(2): 283–290.

13.

13 Trowbridge CC Vasquez M Stammers AH . The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective, randomized study–Part II. JECT 2000; 32(3): 120–128.

14.

14 Ottens J Baker RA Sanderson A Newland RF Knight JL . Improving cardiac surgery: does continuous blood gas monitoring have a role to play? Proceedings 2007 Perfusion Downunder. JECT 2007; 39: 313.

15.

15 Eagle KA Guyton RA Davidoff R . ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation. 2004; 110(14): e340–e437.

16.

16 Ferraris VA Ferraris SP Saha SP . Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83(5 Suppl): S27–S86.

17.

18.

19.

19 Trowbridge CC Stammers AH Wood GC . Improved outcomes during cardiac surgery: a multifactorial enhancement of cardiopulmonary bypass techniques. JECT 2005; 37: 165–172.