In his article Mellow claims that the 'predictive model' is based on a transformational analysis of word formation. We will show that this is incorrect and that instead, the model is based on the psychological concept of exchange of linguistic information. Therefore, Mellow's evaluation of various types of transformational analyses is quite irrelevant for the model.
To demonstrate our point we will reproduce the full text of the original description of the 'predictive model'. We will show that the transformational connection should properly be traced to Clahsen's strategies which apply to syntax only. The strategies approach will then be described in contrast to the 'predictive model' in order to characterize the two approaches and their historical context. This will provide the background to a brief critique of the strategies approach. Theory formation in later processing approaches to SLA will then be sketched out briefly before addressing several points of detail in Mellow's article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, C.-J.1973: Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
Bever, T.G.1970: The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J, editor, Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
3.
Bickerton, D.1971: Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language7, 457-92.
4.
Bresnan, J. editor, 1982: The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Clahsen, H.1979: Syntax oder Produktionsstrategien. Zum natürlichen Zweitspracherwerb der `Gastarbeiter'. In Kloepfer, R., editor. Bildung und Ausbildung in der Romania. Munich: W. Fink, 343-54.
6.
— 1984: The acquisition of German word order: a test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development. In Anderson, R., editor, Second languages. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
7.
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. and Pienemann, M.1983: Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.
8.
DeCamp, D.1973: Implicational scales and sociolinguistic linearity. Linguistics73, 30-43.
9.
Guttmann, L.1944: A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review9, 139-50.
10.
Hudson, T.1993: Nothing does not equal zero: problems with applying developmental sequence findings to assessment and pedagogy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 461-93.
11.
Hulstijn, J.1990: A comparison between the information-processing and the analysis/control approaches to language learning. Applied Linguistics11, 30-45.
12.
Johnston, M.1985: Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English . Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.
13.
Labov, W.1972: The internal evolution of linguistic rules. In Stockwell, R.P. and Macauley, R.K.S., editors, Linguistic change and generative theory . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
14.
Levelt, W.J.M.1977: Skill theory and language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition1, 53-70.
15.
— 1989: Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
McLaughlin, B.1987: Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
17.
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T. and McLeod, B.1983: Second language learning: an information-processing perspective . Language Learning33, 135-57.
18.
Meisel, J.M.1983: Strategies of second language acquisition: more than one kind of simplification. In Anderson, R.W. , editor, Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition . Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
19.
Meisel, J.M., Clahsen, H. and Pienemann, M.1981: On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition3, 109-35.
20.
Morton, J.1981: The status of information processing models of language . In A joint symposium of the Royal Society and the British Academy organized by H. C. Languget, J. Lyons and D. E. Broadbent, 11-12 March . London: The Royal Society.
21.
Pienemann, M.1981: Der Zweitsprachenerwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder. Bonn: Bouvier.
22.
— 1984: Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages . Studies in Second Language Acquisition6, 186-214.
23.
— 1987: Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics10, 83-113.
24.
— 1988: Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. In Kasper, G., editor, AILA Review 5: classroom research, 40-72.
25.
— 1989: Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics1, 52-79.
26.
— 1995: Language processing and language acquisition: processability theory. Unpublished MS, Australian National University .
27.
Pienemann, M. and Håkansson, G.1995: Towards a theory of L2 processability: Swedish as a test case. Unpublished MS, Australian National University and Lund University.
28.
Pienemann, M. and Johnston, M.1987a: Factors influencing the development of language proficiency . In Nunan, D., editor, Applying second language acquisition research, Adelaide : National Curriculum Research Centre, Adult Migrant Education Program, 45-141.
29.
— 1987b: A predictive framework of second language acquisition . Unpublished MS, University of Sydney.
30.
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. and Brindley, G.1988: Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10, 217-24.
31.
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. and Meisel, J.M.1993: The Multi-Dimensional Model, linguistic profiling and related issues: a reply to Hudson. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 461-93.
32.
Pinker, S.1984: Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Schmidt, R.1992: Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency . Studies in Second Language Acquisition14, 357-85.
34.
Selkirk, E.1982: The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
35.
White, L.1989: Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36.
— 1991: Second language competence versus second language performance: UG or processing strategies? In Eubank, L. , editor, Point counterpoint, Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 67-189.
