Book reviews: Huebner,T. and Ferguson,C.A.,editors,1991: Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 435 pp. DFL 60,paper. ISBN 90 272 2466 8
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online October, 1995
Book reviews: Huebner,T. and Ferguson,C.A.,editors,1991: Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 435 pp. DFL 60,paper. ISBN 90 272 2466 8
Birdsong, D.1992: Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language68, 706-55.
2.
Bley-Vroman, R.1989: What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. and Schachter, J. editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41-68.
3.
Bley-Vroman, R. and Yoshinaga, N.1991: Broad and narrow constraints on the English dative alternation: some fundamental differences between native speakers and foreign language learners. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL 11,
4.
Chomsky, N.1981: Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris. — 1986: Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
5.
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.1986: The availability of UG to adult and child learners: a study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research2, 93-119.
6.
— 1989: The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research5, 1-29.
7.
Clark, H.H.1973: The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour12, 335-59.
8.
Cook, V.1991: The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence . Second Language Research7, 103-17.
9.
Coppieters, R.1987: Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language63, 544-73.
10.
du Plessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L. and White, L.1987: UG or not UG, that is the question: a reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Second Language Research3, 56-75.
11.
Finer, D.L.1991: Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In Eubank, L., editor, Point counterpoint . Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 351-74.
12.
Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W. , editors, 1988: Linguistic theory and second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
13.
Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G. and O'Neil, W., editors, in preparation: The generative study of second language acquisition . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
Gass, S. and Schachter, J.1989: Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Gregg, K.1989: Second language acquisition theory: the case for a generative perspective. In Gass, S. and Schachter, J., editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15-40.
16.
Hilles, S.1986: Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter. Second Language Research2, 33-52.
17.
Hyams, N.1987: The theory of parameters and syntactic development. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E., editors, Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1-22.
18.
Hyams, N. and Wexler, K.1993: On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language . Linguistic Inquiry24, 421-60.
19.
Jackendoff, R.S.1990: Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
20.
Johnson, J. and Newport, E.1991: Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition39, 215-58.
21.
MacWhinney, B.1987: The competition model. In MacWhinney, B., editor, Mechanisms of language acquisition . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 249-308.
22.
— 1992: Transfer and competition in second language learning. In Harris, R., editor, Cognitive processing in bilinguals. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
23.
O'Grady, W.1987: Principles of grammar and learning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Pinker, S.1989: Learnability and cognition. The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
25.
Schachter, J.1993: Second language acquisition: perceptions and possibilities . Second Language Research9, 173-87.
26.
Slobin, D.I.1985: Crosslinguistic evidence for the language making capacity . In Slobin, D.I., editor, The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1157-251.
27.
Sorace, A.1993: Incomplete versus divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research9, 22-48.
28.
Tenny, C.1988: The aspectual interface hypothesis. In Proceeding of NELS. Amhurst, MA: GSAO 18,490-508.
29.
Thomas, M.1991: Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in second language. Language67, 211-39.
30.
Valian, V.1990: Null subjects: a problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition. Cognition35, 105-22.
31.
Vendler, Z.1957: Verbs and times. Philosophical Review66, 143-60.
32.
White, L.1985: The 'pro-drop' parameter in adult second language acquisition . Language Learning35, 47-62.
33.
— 1989: Universal Grammar and second language acquisitionAmsterdam: John Benjamins.
34.
Wolfe Quintero, K.1992a: Learnability and the acquisition of extraction in relative clauses and Wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition14, 39-70.
35.
— 1992b: The representation and acquisition of the lexical structure of English dative verbs: experimental studies of native English speakers and Japanese and Chinese adult learners. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.