There is a considerable amount of recent evidence that stable principles of Universal Grammar (UG) are available to adult second language (L2) learners in structuring their intuitions about the target language grammar. In contrast, however, there is also evidence from the acquisition of word order, agreement and negation in German that there are substantial differences between first language (L1) and L2 learners. In our view, these differences are due to UG principles guiding L1, but not L2 acquisition. We will show that alternative ways of accounting for the L1/L2 differences are not successful. Finally we will deal with the question of how our view can be reconciled with the idea that L2 learners can use UG principles to some extent in the evaluation of target sentences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bley-Vroman, R.1987: The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis (1988, in press).
2.
Bley-Vroman, R. and Chaudron, C.1987: Review essay: a critique of Flynn's parameter setting model of second language acquisition. Manuscript, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
3.
Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S. and Ioup, G.1988: The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Manuscript, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
4.
Bongaerts, T. and Jordens, P.1985: Ontwikkelingen in tussentaal. Tweede taalontwikkelingen als herstructureringsproces. Tijdschrift voor Taalen Tekstwetenschap5, 231-45.
5.
Chomsky, N.1981: Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris. —1986: Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6.
Clahsen, H.1982: Spracherwerb in der Kindheit. Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tübingen: Narr.
7.
— 1984: The acquisition of German word order. A test case for cognitive approaches to second language development. In Andersen, R., editor, Second languages, Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 219-42.
8.
1986: Verb inflections in German child language. Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics24, 79-121.
9.
1987 : Connecting theories of language processing and second language acquisition. In: Pfaff, C., editor, First and second language acquisition processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Newbury House, 103-16.
10.
— 1988a: Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: a study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. In Flynn and O'Neil, editors: 47-75.
11.
— 1988b: Kritische Phasen der Grammatikentwicklung. Eine Untersuchung zum Negationserwerb bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft7, 3-31.
12.
—in press: Learnability theory and the problem of development in language acquisition. To appear in Roeper, T. and Weissenborn J., editors, Theoretical studies of language acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.
13.
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. and Pienemann, M.1983: Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.
14.
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.1986: The accessibility of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners. A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research2, 93-119.
15.
Coenen, J.1987: The acquisition of Dutch. Report tothe European Science Foundation. Nijmegen: Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik.
16.
Coppieters, R.1987: Competence differences between native and nonnative speakers . Language63, 544-73.
17.
den Besten, H.1986: Decidability in the syntax of verbs of (not necessarily) West-Germanic languages. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL)28, 232-56.
18.
du Plessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L. and White, L.1987: UG or not UG, that is the question: a reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Second Language Research3, 56-75.
19.
Emonds, J.1976: A transformational approach to English syntax. New York.
20.
Felix, S.1985: Parasitic gaps in German. In Abraham, W., editor, Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, Tübingen: Narr.
21.
— 1987: Cognition and language growth. Foris : Dordrecht.
22.
— 1988: UG generated knowledge in L2 acquisition. In Flynn and O'Neil, editors: 277-94.
23.
Finer, D.1988: Modularity and lexical parameterization in the adult grammar. Unpublished ms.: State University of New York.
24.
Flynn, S.1987: A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition: experimental studies in anaphora. Dordrecht: Reidel.
25.
1988 : Nature of development in L2 learning and implications for theories of language acquisition in general. In Flynn and O'Neil, editors: 76-89.
26.
Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W. editors, 1988: Linguistic theory in second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.
27.
Hyams, N.1986: Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht.
28.
Jansen, B., Lalleman, J. and Muysken, P.1981: The alternation hypothesis: acquisition of Dutch word order by Turkish and Moroccan foreign workers. Language Learning31, 315-36.
29.
Jordens, P.1988: The acquisition of word order in Dutch and German as L1 and L2. Second Language Research4, 41-65.
30.
Klein, W. and Carroll, M.1987: Utterance structure: the acquisition of German. Report tothe European Science Foundation. Nijmegen: Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik.
31.
Köpcke, K.-M.1987: Der Erwerb morphologischer Ausdrucksmittel durch L2 Lerner . Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft6, 186-205.
32.
Kratzer, A.1984: On deriving syntactic differences between English and German. Manuscript. TUBerlin.
33.
Lust, B. and Mangione, L.1983: The principal branching direction parameter constraint in first language acquisition of anaphora. NELS13, 145-60.
34.
Miller, M.1976: Zur Logik der frühkindlichen Sprachentwicklung. Stuttgart: Klett.
35.
Obler, L.1988: Commentary: Neurolinguistics and parameter setting. In Flynn and O'Neil , editors: 117-26.
36.
Platzack, C.1983: Germanic word order and the COMP/INFL parameter. Working Papers in ScandinavianSyntax2, 1-45.
37.
Pienemann, M. and Johnston, M.1987: A predictive framework of second language acquisition. Manuscript, University of Sydney.
38.
Rizzi, L.1982: Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht : Foris.
39.
Rutherford, W.1983: Language typology and language transfer. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L. , editors, Language transfer in language learning, Rowley, Mass.: 358-70.
40.
Schachter, J.1988: On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition . University of Southern California: Los Angeles.
41.
Schwartz, B. and Tomaselli, A.1988: Some implications from an analysis of German word order . Paper presented at the Fifth Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, Groningen, 19-20 May 1988.
42.
Stowell, T.1981: The origins of phrase structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
43.
Stutterheim, C.1987: Temporalität in der Zweitsprache. Berlin: deGruyter.
44.
Travis, L.1984: Parameters and effects of word order variation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
45.
Webelhuth, G.1987: Eine universale Scrambling-Theorie. Paper presented at the DGFS-Meeting, Augsburg, 4-6 March 1987.
46.
Webelhuth, G. and den Besten, H.1987: Remnant topicalization and the contituent structure of VP in the Germanic SOV languages. Paper presented at the GLOW-Colloquium, Venice, 30 March-1 April 1987.
47.
Wexler, K. and Manzini, R.1987: Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E., editors, Parameter setting, Dordrecht: Reidel, 41-76.
48.
White, L.1988: Island effects in second language acquisition. In Flynn and O'Neil , editors, 144-72.
49.
to appear: The adjacency condition on case assignment: do L2 learners observe the subset principle? In Gass, S. and Schachter, J., editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Zobl, H.1986: Word order typology, lexical government and the prediction of multiple, graded effects in L2 word order. Language Learning36, 159-83.
