This study examines first language (L1) phonological and phonetic influences on the perception of Vietnamese tones by Mandarin speakers learning Vietnamese as a second language (L2) in light of the Perceptual Assimilation Model. Participants were divided into two groups according to their length of classroom instruction, i.e. beginning (two months) and experienced (two years) learners. They first discriminated 15 Vietnamese tone contrasts and then mapped six Vietnamese tones onto their L1 Mandarin tone categories. The manner in which a Vietnamese tone contrast was mapped onto L1 categories (i.e. Categorized or Uncategorized) and the perceived overlap of L1 response categories of the contrast generally predicted its discrimination accuracy. Beginning and experienced learners exhibited differences in their perceptual assimilation of two Vietnamese tones but there was no significant difference in their accuracy of discriminating tone contrasts. The present study generally supports the Perceptual Assimilation Model and implications for L2 tone perception are discussed.
AntoniouMBestCTTylerMD (2013) Focusing the lens of language experience: Perception of Ma’di stops by Greek and English bilinguals and monolinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America133: 2397–411.
2.
AsanoY (2018) Discriminating non-native segmental length contrasts under increased task demands. Language and Speech61: 409–29.
3.
Baese-BerkMM (2019) Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics81: 981–1005.
4.
BestC (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: StrangeW (ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 171–204.
5.
BestC (2019) The diversity of tone languages and the roles of pitch variation in non-tone languages: Considerations for tone perception research. Frontiers in Psychology10: Article 364.
6.
BestCAvesaniCTylerMDVayraM (2019) PAM revisits the articulatory organ hypothesis: Italians’ perception of English anterior and Nuu-Chah-Nulth posterior voiceless fricatives. In: NyvadAMHejnáMHøjenAJespersenABSørensenMH (eds) A sound approach to language matters: In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn. Aarhus: Aarhus University, pp. 13–40.
7.
BestCMcRobertsGWGoodellE (2001) Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America109: 775–94.
8.
BestCStrangeW (1992) Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics20: 305–30.
9.
BestCTTylerMD (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In: BohnOSMunroMJ (eds) Language experience in second language speech learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.
10.
BoersmaP (2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International5: 341–45.
11.
BraunBGaltsTKabakB (2014) Lexical encoding of L2 tones: The role of L1 stress, pitch accent and intonation. Second Language Research30: 323–50.
12.
BraunBJohnsonEK (2011) Question or tone 2? How language experience and linguistic function guide pitch processing. Journal of Phonetics39: 585–94.
13.
BrowmanCPGoldsteinL (1989) Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology6: 201–51.
14.
BrunelleM (2009) Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese. Journal of Phonetics37: 79–96.
15.
Bundgaard-NielsenRLBestCKroosCTylerMD (2012) Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics33: 643–64.
16.
Bundgaard-NielsenRLBestCTylerMD (2011a) Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition33: 433–61.
17.
Bundgaard-NielsenRLBestCTylerMD (2011b) Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics32: 51–67.
18.
BurnhamDKasisopaBReidA, et al. (2015) Universality and language-specific experience in the perception of lexical tone and pitch. Applied Psycholinguistics36: 1459–91.
19.
ChanRKLeungJH (2020) Why are lexical tones difficult to learn?Studies in Second Language Acquisition42: 33–59.
20.
ChangYSYaoYHuangBH (2017) Effects of linguistic experience on the perception of high-variability non-native tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America141: EL120–26.
21.
ChaoYR (1930) A system of tone-letters. Le Maitre Phonetique45: 24–27.
22.
ChaoYR (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23.
ChenJAntoniouMBestCT (2023) Phonological and phonetic contributions to perception of non-native lexical tones by tone language listeners: Effects of memory load and stimulus variability. Journal of Phonetics96: 101199.
24.
ChenJBestCTAntoniouM (2020) Native phonological and phonetic influences in perceptual assimilation of monosyllabic Thai lexical tones by Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners. Journal of Phonetics83: 101013.
25.
EscuderoP (2005) Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Ridderkerk: LOT.
26.
FarisMMBestCTylerMD (2016) An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America139: EL1–5.
27.
FarisMMBestCTylerMD (2018) Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics70: 1–19.
28.
FlegeJE (1995) Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In: StrangeW (ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 229–73.
29.
FlegeJEBohnO-S (2021) The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In: WaylandR (ed.) Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.
30.
FlegeJEMacKayIRA (2004) Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition26: 1–34.
31.
FoxJWeisbergS (2019) An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage. Available at: https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion (accessed April 2025).
32.
GorbaCCebrianJ (2021) The role of L2 experience in L1 and L2 perception and production of voiceless stops by English learners of Spanish. Journal of Phonetics88: 101094.
33.
HalekohUHojsgaardS (2014) A Kenward–Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models: The R package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software59: 1–30.
34.
HaoY-C (2012) Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics40: 269–79.
35.
HaoY-C (2017) Second language perception of Mandarin vowels and tones. Language and Speech61: 135–52.
36.
HautusMJ (1995) Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofdʹ. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers27: 46–51.
37.
JiaGStrangeWWuYColladoJGuanQ (2006) Perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin speakers: Age-related differences vary with amount of L2 exposure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America119: 1118–30.
38.
KirbyJGiangĐL (2021) Relating production and Perception of L2 Tone. In: WaylandR (ed.) Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249–72.
39.
KuhlPKIversonP (1995) Linguistic experience and the ‘perceptual magnet effect’. In: StrangeW (ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 121–54.
40.
LamérisTJPostB (2023) The combined effects of L1-specific and extralinguistic factors on individual performance in a tone categorization and word identification task by English-L1 and Mandarin-L1 speakers. Second Language Research39: 833–71.
41.
LenthRV (2016) Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software69: 1–33.
42.
LevyES (2009) On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults’ French vowel learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America126: 2670–82.
43.
LiuXEscuderoP (2023) How bidialectalism affects non-native speech acquisition: Evidence from Shanghai and Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics44: 969–90.
44.
LobanovBM (1971) Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America49: 606–08.
45.
MacmillanNACreelmanCD (2005) Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Psychology Press.
46.
MennenI (2015) Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In: Delais-RoussarieEAvanziMHermentS (eds) Prosody and language in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition and languages in multilingual situations. Berlin: Springer, pp. 171–88.
47.
MillerJ (1996) The sampling distribution of dʹ. Perception and Psychophysics58: 65–72.
48.
NhànNT (1984) The syllabeme and patterns of word formation in Vietnamese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
49.
PeirceJGrayJRSimpsonS, et al. (2019) PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods51: 195–203.
50.
PelzlELiuJQiC (2022) Native language experience with tones influences both phonetic and lexical processes when acquiring a second tonal language. Journal of Phonetics95: 101197.
51.
QinZTremblayAZhangJ (2019) Influence of within-category tonal information in the recognition of Mandarin-Chinese words by native and non-native listeners: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Phonetics73: 144–57.
52.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed April 2025).
53.
ReidABurnhamDKasisopaB, et al. (2015) Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: The roles of language experience and visual information. Attention Perception and Psychophysics77: 571–91.
54.
SoCKBestC (2011) Categorizing mandarin tones into listeners’ native prosodic categories: The role of phonetic properties. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics47: 133–45.
55.
SoCKBestC (2014) Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition36: 195–221.
56.
TsukadaKHanJ-I (2019) The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by native Korean speakers differing in their experience with Mandarin. Second Language Research35: 305–18.
57.
TsukadaKKondoMSunaokaK (2016) The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by native Japanese adult listeners with and without Mandarin learning experience. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation2: 225–52.
58.
TurnerJ (2023) Phonetic development of an L2 vowel system and tandem drift in the L1: A residence abroad and L1 re-immersion study. Language and Speech66: 756–85.
59.
TylerMDBestCFaberALevittAG (2014) Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica71: 4–21.
60.
WerkerJFLoganJS (1985) Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics37: 35–44.
61.
WerkerJFTeesRC (1984) Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America75: 1866–78.
62.
WongPCMPerrachioneTK (2007) Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics28: 565–85.
63.
WuXMunroMJWangY (2014) Tone assimilation by Mandarin and Thai listeners with and without L2 experience. Journal of Phonetics46: 86–100.
64.
YipM (2002) Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
YuKLiLChenY, et al. (2019) Effects of native language experience on Mandarin lexical tone processing in proficient second language learners. Psychophysiology56: Article e13448.
66.
ZhangYZhengYLiG (2022) Dialect effects on Mandarin tone perception development. Language and Speech65: 681–96.
