Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-7
Second language phonology: The phonetics–phonology divide,its underrepresentation in L2 research,and the richness of phonological representations from segments to prosodic structure
This article engages with Archibald’s call for greater integration of phonology within generative second language (L2) acquisition research, further exploring the cognitive and theoretical implications of multilingual phonological grammars. Addressing the longstanding imbalance between L2 work in phonology and morphosyntax, it joins Archibald in advocating for deeper consideration of abstract phonological representations and their parallels with syntax. While some of Archibald’s assumptions – such as the recursive nature of phonology and the role of Optimality Theory in its underrepresentation in generative L2 research – invite debate, his broader insights into phonological complexity and interdisciplinary relevance are highly compelling. By critically engaging with these issues, this discussion reinforces the need to bridge phonology and syntax in second language research, while also drawing attention to the distinction between phonetics and phonology and to the role of phonology as part of the grammar and its function within the greater cognitive system.
AlbrightAHayesB (2003) Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition90: 119–61.
2.
ArchibaldJ (1992) Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics37: 301–339.
3.
ArchibaldJ (1993) Language learnability and L2 phonology: The acquisition of metrical parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
4.
ArchibaldJ (1997) Metrical parameters and lexical dependency. In: FlynnSMartohardjonoGO’NeilW (eds) The generative study of second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
ArchibaldJ (1998) Second language phonology, phonetics, and typology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition20: 190–211.
6.
ArchibaldJ (2022) Feature dependency and the poverty of the stimulus in the acquisition of L2 German plural allomorphy. In: LealTShimanskyaEIsabelliC (eds) Generative SLA in the age of minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond (Selected Proceedings of the 15th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 117–36.
7.
ArchibaldJ (2024) Phonology in multilingual grammars: Representational complexity and linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
ArchibaldJ (2025) Waiting in the wings: The place of phonology in the study of multilingual grammars. Second Language Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583241270763
9.
BroselowE (1988) Prosodic phonology and the acquisition of a second language. In: FlynnSO’NeilW (eds) Linguistic theory in second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 295–308.
10.
BroselowEFinerD (1991) Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research7: 35–60.
11.
ChomskyN (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
ClementsGN (1976) Vowel harmony in nonlinear generative phonology: An autosegmental model. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
13.
ClementsGN (1985) The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook2: 225–52.
14.
ClementsGNHumeEV (1995) The internal organization of speech sounds. In: GoldsmithJA (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 245–306.
15.
DresherEKayeJ (1990) A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition34: 137–95.
16.
DupouxEPallierCSebastian-GallesNMehlerJ (1997) A distressing ‘deafness’ in French. Journal of Memory and Language36: 406–421.
17.
ElfnerE (2018) The syntax–prosody interface: Current theoretical approaches and outstanding questions. Linguistic Vanguard4: Article 20160081.
18.
FlegeJE (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In: StrangeW (ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 233–72.
19.
FlegeJEBohnO-S (2021) The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In: WaylandR (ed.) Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.
20.
FlemmingE (2001) Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology18: 7–44.
21.
GarciaGD (2020) Language transfer and positional bias in English stress. Second Language Research36: 445–74.
22.
GarciaGDGoadH (2024) Weight effects and the parametrization of the foot: English versus Portuguese. Laboratory Phonology15(1).
23.
GarciaGDGuzzoNB (2017) The acquisition of English stress by Québec Francophones. In: YavaşMKehoeMCardosoW (eds) Romance–Germanic Bilingual Phonology. Sheffield: Equinox, pp. 200–220.
24.
GoadHWhiteL (2004) Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In: Foster-CohenSSharwood SmithMSoraceAOtaM (eds) EUROSLA Yearbook, volume 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 119–45.
25.
GoadHWhiteL (2006) Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research22: 243–68.
26.
GoadHWhiteL (2009) Articles in Turkish/English interlanguage revisited: Implications of vowel harmony. In: García-MayoPHawkinsR (eds) Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 201–32.
27.
GoadHWhiteL (2019) Prosodic effects on L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism9: 769–808.
HayesB (1995) Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
HayesB (2000) Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory. In: DekkersJvan der LeeuwFvan de WeijerJ (eds) Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–120.
31.
ÖzçelikÖ (2014) Prosodic faithfulness to foot edges: The case of Turkish stress. Phonology31: 229–69.
32.
ÖzçelikÖ (2016) The prosodic acquisition path hypothesis: Towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of phonology. Glossa1: Article 28.
33.
ÖzçelikÖ (2017) The Foot is not an obligatory constituent of the Prosodic Hierarchy: ‘Stress’ in Turkish, French and child English. The Linguistic Review34: 157–213.
34.
ÖzçelikÖ (2018) Universal Grammar and second language phonology: Full Transfer / Prevalent Access in the L2 acquisition of Turkish ‘stress’ by English and French speakers. Language Acquisition25: 231–67.
35.
ÖzçelikÖ (2021) L2 acquisition of a complex stress pattern: UG-constrained learning paths in Khalkha Mongolian. Frontiers in Psychology12: Article 627797.
36.
ÖzçelikÖ (2024) The phonology of Turkish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
ÖzçelikÖSprouseR (2017) Emergent knowledge of a universal phonological principle in the L2 acquisition of vowel harmony in Turkish: A ‘four’-fold poverty of the stimulus in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research33: 179–206.
38.
PaterJ (1997) Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. In: HannahsSJYoung-ScholtenM (eds) Focus on phonological acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 235–62.
39.
PeperkampSDupouxE (2002) A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. In: GussenhovenCWarnerN (eds) Laboratory phonology VII. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 203–40.
40.
PierrehumbertJB (2003) Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech46: 115–54.
41.
PrinceASmolenskyP (2008) Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Originally available as a technical report, 1993.
42.
SchwartzBSprouseR (1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research12: 40–72.
43.
SteeleJ (2002) Representation and phonological licensing in the L2 acquisition of prosodic structure. PhD Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
44.
van der HulstH (2014) Word stress: theoretical and typological issues. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
WhiteL (1989) Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46.
WhiteL (2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
