The acquisition of Italian stop consonants by Mandarin Chinese-speaking learners has hardly been investigated. This study was designed to fill this gap. To investigate Chinese learners’ acquisition patterns of Italian voiced and voiceless stops, a perception experiment and a production experiment were conducted. Twenty Mandarin Chinese-speaking undergraduate students majoring in Italian, five native Italian and five native Mandarin speakers served as participants in the perception experiment; and an equal number of participants with the same language backgrounds served as participants in the production experiment. In the perception experiment, the participants had to identify the stimuli in three continua (i.e. bilabial, alveolar and velar) where voice onset time (VOT) values ranged from −50 ms to 90 ms in 10 ms steps. In the production experiment, data were collected from a reading task in which the participants were asked to read the target words with word-initial stops in carrier-sentences; the VOT and closure durations were measured. The results show that, in perception, Chinese learners have difficulty differentiating between Italian voiced and voiceless stops; in production, Italian voiced rather than voiceless stops represent a challenge for Chinese learners. The results are in line with the predictions made by the Perceptual Assimilation Model-L2 (PAM-L2) and the Speech Learning Model (SLM), as well as with most other studies focusing on the acquisition of stops of ‘true-voice languages’ by Chinese learners.
BatesDMaechlerMBolkerB, et al. (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48.
2.
BeckmanJJessenMRingenC (2013) Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true-voice languages. Journal of Linguistics49: 259–84.
3.
BestCTTylerM (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In: MunroMJBohnOS (eds) Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.
4.
BoersmaPWeeninkD (2020) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Available at: http://www.praat.org (accessed February 2022).
5.
BortoliniUZmarichCFiorR, et al. (1995) Word-initial voicing in the productions of stops in normal and preterm Italian infants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology31: 191–206.
6.
BradySADarwinCJ (1978) Range effect in the perception of voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America63: 1556–58.
7.
CaramazzaAYeni-KomshianGHZurifEB, et al. (1973) The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French–English bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America54: 421–28.
8.
ChaoKChenL (2008) A cross-linguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing2008: 215–32.
9.
ChenY (2007) A comparison of Spanish produced by Chinese L2 learners and native speakers: An acoustic phonetics approach. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
10.
ChoTLadefogedP (1999) Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics27: 207–29.
11.
CorettaS (2019) An exploratory study of voicing-related differences in vowel duration as compensatory temporal adjustment in Italian and Polish. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4: 1–25.
12.
de LeeuwEStockallLLazaridou-ChatzigogaD, et al. (2021) Illusory vowels in Spanish–English sequential bilinguals: Evidence that accurate L2 perception is neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate L2 production. Second Language Research37: 587–618.
13.
DingHZhanYLiaoS, et al. (2019) Production of English stops by Mandarin Chinese learners. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 888–892). Poznań, Poland: The International Speech Communication Association (ISCA).
14.
DoolingRJOkanoyaKBrownSD (1989) Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): The voiced–voiceless distinction. Perception and Psychophysics46: 65–71.
15.
DuanmuS (2007) The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
EckmanFRIversonGKSongJY (2013) The role of hypercorrection in the acquisition of L2 phonemic contrasts. Second Language Research29: 257–83.
17.
EilersREWilsonWRMooreJM (1979) Speech discrimination in the language-innocent and the language-wise: A study in the perception of voice onset time. Journal of Child Language6: 1–18.
18.
EimasPDSiquelandERJusczykP, et al. (1971) Speech perception in infants. Science171: 303–06.
19.
EspositoA (2002) On vowel height and consonantal voicing effects: Data from Italian. Phonetica59: 197–231.
20.
EspositoADi BenedettoMG (1999) Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America106: 2051–62.
21.
FlegeJE (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In: StrangeW (ed.) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 233–77.
22.
FlegeJE (1996) English vowel productions by Dutch talkers: More evidence for the ‘similar’ vs. ‘new’ distinction. In: JamesALeatherJ (eds) Second-language speech: Structure and process. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 11–52.
23.
FlegeJE (2002) Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In: BurmeisterPPiskeTRohdeA (eds) An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, pp. 217–44.
24.
FlegeJEEeftingW (1986) Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica43: 155–71.
25.
FlegeJEEeftingW (1987a) Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication6: 185–202.
26.
FlegeJEEeftingW (1987b) Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics15: 67–83.
27.
FlegeJEEeftingW (1988) Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: Evidence for phonetic category formation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America83: 729–40.
FrancisALCioccaVChingYu JM (2003) Accuracy and variability of acoustic measures of voicing onset. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America113: 1025–32.
30.
GabrielCKupischTSeoudyJ (2016) VOT in French as a foreign language: A production and perception study with mono- and multilingual learners (German/Mandarin–Chinese). In: Actes du 5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. Paris: ILP/EDP Sciences, pp. 1–14.
31.
GamkrelidzeTV (1975) On the correlation of stops and fricatives in a phonological system. Lingua35: 231–61.
32.
GrosjeanF (2007) The bilingual’s language modes. In: LiW (ed.) The bilingualism reader. 2nd edition. Routledge, pp. 428–49.
33.
HuW (2020) A panel study of Japanese plosive learning by Chinese learners: Taking the perception of pa and ba as example. Nihougo no Gakushu to Kenkyu1: 61–70.
34.
HualdeJISimonetMNadeuM (2011) Consonant lenition and phonological recategorization. Laboratory Phonology2: 301–29.
35.
JiangX (2020) Zhongguo riyu xuexizhe riyu qingzhuo seyin fayin yanjiu: Yi VOT he GAP wei zhongxin [The production of Japanese voiced and voiceless stops by Chinese learners: Centering on VOT and GAP]. Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation4: 74–76.
36.
JusczykPWRosnerBSReedMA, et al. (1989) Could temporal order differences underlie 2-month-olds’ discrimination of English voicing contrasts?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America85: 1741–49.
37.
KeatingPA (1984) Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language60: 286–319.
38.
KeatingPAMikośMJGanong IIIWF (1981) A cross-language study of range of voice onset time in the perception of initial stop voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America70: 1261–71.
39.
KramerM (2009) The phonology of Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
KuhlPKMillerJD (1975) Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced–voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science190: 69–72.
41.
KuhlPKMillerJD (1978) Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America63: 905–17.
LiskerLAbramsonAS (1964) A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word20: 384–422.
45.
LiuZCebrianJ (2016) Exploring cross-linguistic influence: Perception and production of L1, L2 and L3 bilabial stops by Mandarin Chinese speakers. Unpublished master’s thesis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
46.
LiuJZengTLuX (2019) Challenges in multi-language pronunciation teaching: A cross-linguistic study of Chinese students’ perception of voiced and voiceless stops. CÍRCULO de Linguística Aplicada a la Comunicación79: 99–118.
47.
NasukawaK (2005) The representation of laryngeal-source contrasts in Japanese. In: van de WeijerJMNanjoKNishiharaT (eds) Voicing in Japanese. Mouton de Gruyter Berlin, pp. 71–87.
48.
NeareyTMRochetBL (1994) Effects of place of articulation and vowel context on VOT production and perception for French and English Stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association24: 1–18.
49.
NodariRCelataCNagyN (2019) Socio-indexical phonetic features in the heritage language context: Voiceless stop aspiration in the Calabrian community in Toronto. Journal of Phonetics73: 91–112.
50.
PetersonRACavanaughJE (2020) Ordered quantile normalization: A semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era. Journal of Applied Statistics47: 2312–27.
51.
PickettERBlumsteinSEBurtonMW (1999) Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate consonant contrast in Italian. Phonetica56: 135–57.
52.
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Available at: https://www.R-project.org (accessed February 2022).
53.
RineyTJTakagiNOtaK, et al. (2007) The intermediate degree of VOT in Japanese initial voiceless stops. Journal of Phonetics35: 439–43.
54.
RingenCKulikovV (2012) Voicing in Russian stops: Cross-linguistic implications. Journal of Slavic Linguistics20: 269–86.
55.
RochetBLChenF (1992) Acquisition of the French VOT contrasts by adult speakers of Mandarin Chinese. In: Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing Proceedings. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta, pp. 273–76.
56.
RochetBLYanmeiF (1991) Effect of consonant and vowel context on Mandarin Chinese VOT: Production and perception. Canadian Acoustics19: 105–06.
57.
RojczykA (2011) Perception of the English voice onset time continuum by Polish learners. In: ArabskiJWojtaszekA (eds) The acquisition of L2 phonology. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 37–58.
58.
RossettiR (1994) Gemination of Italian stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America95: 2874–74.
59.
SerniclaesW (2005) On the invariance of speech percepts. ZAS Papers in Linguistics40: 177–94.
60.
ShimizuK (1996) Cross-language study of voicing contrasts of stop consonants in Asian languages. Tokyo: Seibido.
61.
StevensM (2010) How widespread is preaspiration in Italy?Working papers: 97–102.
62.
SunYProfitaS (2020) Cross-linguistic study on VOT of Chinese trilingual speakers. Studies in Literature and Language20: 98–102.
63.
SvantessonJ-O (1987) Some data on the duration of Chinese stops and affricates. Working papers/Lund University, Department of Linguistics and Phonetics31: 171–74.
64.
VaggesKFerreroFEMagno-CaldognettoE, et al. (1978) Some acoustic characteristics of Italian consonants. Journal of Italian Linguistics Amsterdam3: 69–84.
65.
WerkerJFTeesRC (1984) Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development7: 49–63.
66.
WinnMB (2020) Manipulation of voice onset time in speech stimuli: A tutorial and flexible Praat script. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America147: 852–66.
67.
XuH (2019) L’acquisizione del ‘Voice Onset Time’ dell’italiano L2 da parte dei sinofoni: Uno studio sperimentale [The acquisition of the ‘Voice Onset Time’ of Italian L2 by Sinophones: An experimental study]. H2D − Revista de Humanidades Digitais1(1).
68.
YangYFangZ (1984) Putonghua songqi he busongqi seyin de yinwei jiexian jiqi fanchou zhijue [Phonemic boundary and categorical perception of Mandarin Chinese stops]. In: Quanguo diwujie xinlixue xueshu huiyi wenzhai xuanji [Proceedings of the 5th Chinese National Psychology Conference] (pp. 220–29). Beijing: Chinese Psychological Society.
69.
YangYChenXXiaoQ (2022) Cross-linguistic similarity in L2 speech learning: Evidence from the acquisition of Russian stop contrasts by Mandarin speakers. Second Language Research38: 3–29.
70.
YuanJ (2001) Hanyu Fangyan Gaiyao [Outline of Chinese dialects]. Beijing: Yuwen chubanshe.
71.
ZhangJ (2012) Zhongguo xuesheng xide fayu seyin de fenxi [Analysis of Chinese students’ production of French Stops]. International Journal of Chinese Studies2: 174–81.
72.
ZhangJ (2014) Stops consonants in Mandarin in the perspective of perception. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Teaching and research on Chinese as a foreign language edition)12: 58–64.
73.
ZhangS (2013) Zhongguo xuesheng fayu xuexi zhong busongqi qingseyin yu zhuoseyin de wenti [Chinese students’ problems in the acquisition of French unaspirated and voiced stops]. Theory and Practice of Contemporary Education5: 100–02.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
