This study aims to understand if Mandarin late learners of English can successfully manipulate acoustic and kinematic cues to deliver English stress contrast in production. Mandarin (N = 8) and English (N = 8) speakers were recorded producing English trochaic (initial stress) and iambic (final stress) items during a nonword repetition task. Speakers’ jaw movement for the utterances was tracked and analysed. Acoustic and kinematic cues were measured for each syllable, including acoustic duration, fundamental frequency (F0), and intensity, as well as jaw movement duration, displacement, peak velocity, and stiffness. Stress ratios (syllable 1 / syllable 2) were calculated for each cue and compared between groups. Results showed that English and Mandarin speakers had generally comparable performance in differentiating trochaic from iambic patterns, as well as in the degree of between-syllable contrast within each pattern. Between-group differences were only observed in acoustic duration and jaw movement velocity/stiffness. These results suggest that the experience with Mandarin stress contributes to Mandarin speakers’ overall successful production of English stress but also results in nonnative use of some acoustic/kinematic cues.
AltmannH (2006) The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study. Newark, DE: University of Delaware.
2.
ArchibaldJ (1997) The acquisition of English stress by speakers of nonaccentual languages: Lexical storage versus computation of stress. Linguistics35: 167–81.
3.
BauerRSBenedictPK (1997) Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
4.
BeckmanMEEdwardsJ (1994) Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. Papers in laboratory phonology3: 7–33.
5.
BestCTTylerMD (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In: BohnO-SMunroMJ (eds) Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.
6.
BoersmaPWeeninkD (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer: Version 6.0.23 [computer program]. Available at: http://www.praat.org (accessed December 2021).
7.
BraunBLemhöferKManiN (2011) Perceiving unstressed vowels in foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America129: 376–87.
8.
CampbellNBeckmanM (1997) Stress, prominence, and spectral tilt. In BotinisAKouroupetroglouGCarayiannisG (eds) Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications: Proceedings of an ESCA workshop. Athens: European Speech Communication Association and University of Athens, pp. 67–70.
9.
ChaoY-R (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
ChenM-Y (2000) Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ChenYXuY (2006) Production of weak elements in speech–evidence from f0 patterns of neutral tone in Standard Chinese. Phonetica63: 47–75.
12.
ChenYRobbMGilbertH, et al. (2001a) Vowel production by Mandarin speakers of English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics15: 427–40.
13.
ChenYRobbMPGilbertHR, et al. (2001b) A study of sentence stress production in Mandarin speakers of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America109: 1681–90.
14.
ChoiW (2021) Cantonese advantage on English stress perception: Constraints and neural underpinnings. Neuropsychologia158: 107888.
15.
ChoiWTongXSamuelAG (2019) Better than native: Tone language experience enhances English lexical stress discrimination in Cantonese–English bilingual listeners. Cognition189: 188–92.
16.
CooperNCutlerAWalesR (2002) Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech45: 207–28.
17.
CutlerA (1986) Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech29: 201–20.
18.
CutlerA (2015) Lexical stress in English pronunciation. In: ReedMLevisJ (eds) Handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 106–124). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
19.
CulterAvan DonselaarW (2001) Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech44: 171–95.
20.
CutlerAWalesRCooperNJanssenJ (2007) Dutch listeners’ use of suprasegmental cues to English stress. In: TrouvainJBarryWJ (ed.) 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007). Pirrot, pp. 1913–16.
21.
De JongKJ (1995) The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America97: 491–504.
22.
DuanmuS (2007) The phonology of standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
DupouxEPeperkampSSebastián-GallésN (2001) A robust method to study stress ‘deafness’. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America110: 1606–18.
24.
DupouxEPeperkampSSebastián-GallésN (2010) Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress ‘deafness’ in simultaneous French–Spanish bilinguals. Cognition114(2): 266–275.
25.
DupouxESebastián-GallésNNavarreteEPeperkampS (2008) Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition106: 682–706.
26.
EdwardsJBeckmanMEFletcherJ (1991) The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America89: 369–82.
27.
EricksonDIwataREndoM, et al. (2004) Effect of tone height on jaw and tongue articulation in Mandarin Chinese. International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone Languages. ISCA archive. Available at https://www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/tal2004/tal4_053.html (accessed December 2021).
28.
ETS (2020) About the TOEFL ITP® Assessment series. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services. Available at: https://www.ets.org/toefl_itp/about (accessed December 2021).
29.
FlegeJE (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and Problems. In: StrangeW (ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 233–272.
30.
FlegeJE (1996) English vowel productions by Dutch talkers: More evidence for the “similar” vs “new” distinction. In: JamesALeatherJ (eds.) Second-language speech: Structure and process. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 11–52.
31.
FlegeJE (2002) Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In: BurmeisterPPiskeTRohdeA (eds.) An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode. Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, pp. 217–244.
32.
FlegeJEBohnO-S (1989) An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition11: 35–62.
33.
FlegeJEBohnO-SJangS (1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics25: 437–70.
34.
FlegeJEMacKayIRMeadorD (1999) Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America106: 2973–87.
35.
FryDB (1955) Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America27: 765–68.
36.
FryDB (1965) The dependence of stress judgments on vowel formant structure. In: ZwirnerEBethgeW (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Basle: Karger, pp. 306–11.
37.
FuQ-JZengF-GShannonRV, et al. (1998) Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America104: 505–10.
38.
GathercoleSE (1995) Nonword repetition: More than just a phonological output task. Cognitive Neuropsychology12: 857–61.
39.
GathercoleSE (2006) Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics27: 513–42.
40.
GoffmanLMalinC (1999) Metrical effects on speech movements in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research42: 1003–15.
41.
GoffmanLSmithA (1999) Development and phonetic differentiation of speech movement patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25: 649–60.
42.
GoffmanLHeislerLChakrabortyR (2006) Mapping of prosodic structure onto words and phrases in children’s and adults’ speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes21: 25–47.
43.
GreenJRWilsonEMWangY-T, et al. (2007) Estimating mandibular motion based on chin surface targets during speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research50: 928–39.
44.
GrigosMIMossALuY (2015) Oral articulatory control in childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research58: 1103–18.
45.
GuentherFH (1994) A neural network model of speech acquisition and motor equivalent speech production. Biological Cybernetics72: 43–53.
46.
GuentherFH (1995) Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review102: 594–621.
47.
GuentherFH (2016) Neural control of speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
HarelDMcAllisterT (2019) Multilevel models for communication sciences and disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research62: 783–801.
49.
HoaM (1983) L’Accentuation en Pékinois [Accentuation in Mandarin]. Paris: Editions Languages Croisés.
50.
HoolePHuF (2004) Tone–vowel interaction in standard Chinese. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2004), pp. 89–92.
51.
HowieJM (1976) Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones, Volume 18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
HungTT (1993) The role of phonology in the teaching of pronunciation to bilingual students. Language, Culture and Curriculum6: 249–56.
53.
JuffsA (1990) Tone, syllable structure and interlanguage phonology: Chinese learners’ stress errors. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching28: 99–118.
54.
JunSA (1995) A phonetic study of stress in Korean. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America98: 2893–93.
55.
KagerR (2007) Feet and metrical stress. In: de LacyP (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology (pp. 195–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
KelsoJSVatikiotis-BatesonESaltzmanEL, et al. (1985) A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: Phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America77: 266–80.
57.
KleinW (1997) L2 language acquisition at different ages. In: MagnussonD (ed.) The lifespan development of individuals: Behavioral, neurobiological, and psychosocial perspectives: A synthesis (pp. 244–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
KuznetsovaABrockhoffPBChristensenRHB (2019) Package ‘lmerTest’: Tests in linear mixed effects models: R package version 3.1-0. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/ (accessed December 2021).
59.
LaiCSuiYYuanJ (2010) A corpus study of the prosody of polysyllabic words in Mandarin Chinese. In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, pp. 1–4. Chicago, IL.
60.
LeeW-SZeeE (2008) Prosodic characteristics of the neutral tone in Beijing Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics36: 1–29.
61.
LenthRV (2016) Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software69: 1–33.
62.
LevyESLawFF (2010) Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception–production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America128: 1290–1305.
63.
LeysCLeyCKleinOBernardPLicataL (2013) Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology49: 764–66.
64.
LiCNThompsonSA (1989) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
65.
LiebermanP (1960) Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America32: 451–54.
66.
LinTWangW (1984) Shengdiao ganzhi wenti [Perception of tones]. Zhongguo Yuyan Xuebao [Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics]2: 59–69.
67.
LinM-CYanJ-Z (1980) Beijinghua qingsheng de shenxue xingzhi [The acoustic feature of neutral tone in Beijing Mandarin]. Fanyan3: 166–78.
68.
LinCYWangMIdsardiWJ, et al. (2014) Stress processing in Mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition17: 316–46.
69.
LinT (1985) Tantao Beijinghua qingyin xingzhi de chubu shiyan [On neutral tone in Beijing Mandarin]. In: Hu S (ed.) Beijing Yuyin Shiyanlu. Working papers in experimental phonetics (pp. 1–26). Beijing Daxue chubanshe [Peking University Press].
70.
LiuSSamuelAG (2004) Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when F0 information is neutralized. Language and Speech47: 109–38.
71.
MathWorks (2013) Global optimization toolbox: Users’ guide. Natick, MA: MathWorks, Inc.
72.
MooshammerCFuchsS (2002) Stress distinction in German: Simulating kinematic parameters of tongue-tip gestures. Journal of Phonetics30: 337–55.
73.
MunsonBKurtzBAWindsorJ (2005) The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research48: 1033–47.
74.
OkobiAO (2006) Acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
75.
OstryDJMunhallKG (1985) Control of rate and duration of speech movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America77: 640–48.
76.
PeperkampSDupouxE (2002) A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. Laboratory Phonology7: 203–40.
77.
PiskeTFlegeJEMacKayIR, et al. (2002) The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian–English bilinguals. Phonetica59: 49–71.
78.
QinZChienY-FTremblayA (2017) Processing of word-level stress by Mandarin-speaking second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics38: 541–70.
79.
QuC (2013) Representation and acquisition of the tonal system of Mandarin Chinese. PhD dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
80.
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed December 2021).
81.
SahaSNMandalSKD (2018) Phonetic realization of English lexical stress by native (L1) Bengali speakers compared to native (L1) English speakers. Computer Speech and Language47: 1–15.
82.
SasisekaranJSmithASadagopanN, et al. (2010) Nonword repetition in children and adults: effects on movement coordination. Development Science13: 521–32.
83.
ScarboroughRKeatingPMattysSL, et al. (2009) Optical phonetics and visual perception of lexical and phrasal stress in English. Language and Speech52: 135–75.
84.
SchwarzG (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics6: 461–64.
85.
ScovelT (1988) A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. New York: Newbury House.
86.
SeligerHW (1978) Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In: RitchieWC (ed.) Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 11–19). New York: Academic Press.
87.
ShawJAChenW-RProctorMI, et al. (2016) Influences of tone on vowel articulation in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research59: S1566–74.
88.
ShribergLDGreenJRCampbellTF, et al. (2003) A diagnostic marker for childhood apraxia of speech: The coefficient of variation ratio. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics17: 575–95.
89.
SimmondsAJWiseRJLeechR (2011) Two tongues, one brain: Imaging bilingual speech production. Frontiers in Psychology2: 166.
90.
SluijterAMVan HeuvenVJ (1996) Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. In: Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing: ICSLP ’96, pp. 630–33.
91.
SluijterAMVan HeuvenVJPacillyJJ (1997) Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America101: 503–13.
92.
SohnH-M (2001) The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93.
StevensKN (1989) On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics17: 3–45.
94.
TsukadaKBirdsongDBialystokE, et al. (2005) A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics33: 263–90.
95.
Van BonWHVan Der PijlJM (1997) Effects of word length and wordlikeness on pseudoword repetition by poor and normal readers. Applied Psycholinguistics18: 101–14.
96.
WagenmakersE-JFarrellS (2004) AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review11: 192–96.
97.
WhalenDHXuY (1992) Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica49: 25–47.
98.
XuYProm-onS (2019) Economy of effort or maximum rate of information? Exploring basic principles of articulatory dynamics. Frontiers in Psychology10: 2469.
99.
ZhangMGeisslerCShawJ (2019) Gestural representations of tone in Mandarin: Evidence from timing alternations. In: CalhounSEscuderoPTabainMWarrenP (eds) Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, pp. 1803–07.
100.
ZhangYFrancisA (2010) The weighting of vowel quality in native and non-native listeners’ perception of English lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics38: 260–71.
101.
ZhangYNissenSLFrancisAL (2008) Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America123: 4498–4513.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
