This study examines (a) the prosodic cues to stress and focus in Ukrainian speakers in their first language (L1 Ukrainian) and in a second language (L2 German), as compared to German speakers and (b) the influence of F0 during online word recognition in L2 German. Analyses of productions of trisyllabic target words differing in stress (Experiment 1) show that stressed vowels are consistently longer and produced with slightly higher intensity than unstressed vowels, with little additional modulation by focus (focused, unfocused) and hardly any group effects (L1 Ukrainian, L2 German, L1 German). The groups differed strongly in F0 though. While L1 Ukrainian speakers produced the initial syllable with high-pitched and stressed syllables with a falling/low F0 contour (suggesting head-edge prominence marking), L1 German speakers produced focus with a rising pitch accent. There were two subgroups of learners: a small group that produced the conditions as in L1 Ukrainian (Type 1) and a larger group that was similar to L1 German (Type 2). In perception (Experiment 2), target words were fixated more when the first syllable was high-pitched (in line with L1 Ukrainian productions). Similar to Germans, Type 2 learners temporarily treated high-pitched syllables as stressed, leading to increased competitor fixations when the pitch peak preceded the stressed syllable (early-peak accent, H+L*, compared to medial-peak accents, L+H*). These findings demonstrate individual differences in the L2 production of stress and focus, which are closely linked to cue use during L2 word recognition.
AltmannH. (2006). The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study [PhD thesis]. University of Delaware.
2.
ArvanitiA.LaddD. R.MennenI. (1998). Stability of tonal alignment: The case of Greek prenuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics, 26(1), 3–25.
3.
BaayenR. H.PiepenbrockR.GulikersL. (1996). The CELEX lexical database (CD-rom). Linguistic Data Consortium.
4.
BaekH. (2024). Acoustics of the alignment of narrow focus prosody and lexical stress in native and nonnative English productions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 156(4), 2340–2350.
5.
BatesD. M.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
6.
BaumannS.GriceM. (2006). The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1636–1657.
BokovaV. A. (2021). The prosodic grammar of contemporary standard Ukrainian [PhD thesis]. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
10.
BordenG.GerberA.MilsarkG. (1983). Production and perception of the/r/-/l/contrast in Korean adults learning English. Language Learning, 33(4), 499–526.
11.
BradlowA. R.Akahane-YamadaR.PisoniD. B.TohkuraY. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985.
12.
BraunB.TagliapietraL. (2011). On-line interpretation of intonational meaning in L2. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 224–235.
13.
BroersmaM. (2025). The challenges of l2 spoken word recognition. In ReedM.LevisJ. M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language listening (pp. 29–42). Wiley Online Library.
14.
BrovčenkoT. O. (1969). Slovesnyj naholos v sučasnij ukrajins’kij movi [Word stress in contemporary Ukrainian]. Nauvkova dumka.
15.
BüringD. (2016). Intonation and meaning. Oxford University Press.
16.
CasillasJ. V. (2016). The longitudinal development of fine phonetic detail in late learners of Spanish [PhD thesis]. The University of Arizona.
17.
CasillasJ. V. (2020). The longitudinal development of fine-phonetic detail: Stop production in a domestic immersion program. Language Learning, 70(3), 768–806.
18.
CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (2001). Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (Vol. 31). Multilingual Matters.
19.
ChuangY.-Y.FonJ.PapakyritsisI.BaayenH. (2021). Analyzing phonetic data with generalized additive mixed models. Routledge.
20.
ConnellK.HülsS.Martínez-GarcíaM. T.QinZ.ShinS.YanH.TremblayA. (2018). English learners’ use of segmental and suprasegmental cues to stress in lexical access: An Eye-Tracking study. Language Learning, 68(3), 635–668.
21.
CooperN.CutlerA.WalesR. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45(3), 207–228.
22.
CutlerA. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. MIT Press.
23.
DeloguF.ZhengY. (2020). Beneficial effects of musicality on the development of productive phonology skills in second language acquisition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 618.
24.
DomahsU.WieseR.Bornkessel-SchlesewskyI.SchlesewskyM. (2008). The processing of German word stress: Evidence for the prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 25(1), 1–36.
25.
DonselaarW.KosterM.CutlerA. (2005). Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 251–274.
26.
DupouxE.PeperkampS.áé& Sebasti n-Gall sN. (2001). A robust method to study stress ‘deafness’. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618.
27.
EckmanF. R. (2013). Second language phonology. In GassS. M.MackeyA. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 91–105). Routledge.
28.
FéryC.PaslawskaA.FanselowG. (2007). Nominal split constructions in Ukrainian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 15(1), 3–48.
29.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO.-S.JangS. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.
30.
FlegeJ. E.DavidianR. D. (1984). Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5(4), 323–347.
31.
FlegeJ. E.MacKayI. R.MeadorD. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.
32.
FriedrichC. K.KotzS. A.FriedericiA. D.AlterK. (2004). Pitch modulates lexical identification in spoken word recognition: ERP and behavioral evidence. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(2), 300–308.
33.
FryD. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1(2), 126–152.
34.
GibsonT. A.BernalesC. (2020). The influence of language background and second language phonetics training on the perception of lexical stress in a second language. Revista Signos, 53, 80–103.
35.
GordonM.RoettgerT. (2017). Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic survey. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), Article 7.
36.
GravesW. W.DesaiR.HumphriesC.SeidenbergM. S.BinderJ. R. (2010). Neural systems for reading aloud: A multiparametric approach. Cerebral Cortex, 20(8), 1799–1815.
HuettigF.McQueenJ. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 460–482.
39.
JakubíčekM.KilgarriffA.KovářV.RychlýP.SuchomelV. (2013). The TenTen corpus family. In Proceedings of the 7th international corpus linguistics conference (CL) (pp. 125–127). Lexical Computing Ltd.
40.
JekielM.MalarskiK. (2021). Musical hearing and musical experience in second language English vowel acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(5), 1666–1682.
41.
JessenM.MarasekK.SchneiderK.ClahßenK. (1995). Acoustic correlates of word stress and the tense/lax opposition in the vowel system of German. In. Proceedings of International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 4, 428–431.
42.
JiaG.StrangeW.WuY.ColladoJ.GuanQ. (2006). Perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin speakers: Age-related differences vary with amount of L2 exposure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2), 1118–1130.
43.
JunS.-A. (2006). Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
44.
KangS.Guion-AndersonS.RheeS.-C.AhnH. (2012). The effect of language immersion on the acquisition of second language suprasegmentals. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 179–207.
45.
KijakA. M. (2009). How stressful is L2 stress? A cross-linguistic study of L2 perception and production of metrical systems [PhD thesis]. University of Utrecht.
46.
KohlerK. J. (1991). Terminal intonation patterns in single-accent utterances of German: Phonetics, phonology and semantics. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Kiel (AIPUK) [Working Papers of the Institute of Phonetics and Digital Signal Processing at the University of Kiel], 25, 115–185.
47.
KohlerK. J. (2012). The perception of lexical stress in German: Effects of segmental duration and vowel quality in different prosodic patterns. Phonetica, 69(1-2), 68–93.
48.
KormosJ. (2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In GranenaG.LongM. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 131–152). John Benjamins.
49.
KutscheidS.Zahner-RitterK.LeemannA.BraunB. (2022). How prior experience with pitch accents shapes the perception of word and sentence stress. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(1), 103–119.
50.
LaddD. R. (2008). Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.
LialiouM.öGriceM. R.hrC. T.SchumacherP. B. (2024). Auditory processing of intonational rises and falls in German: Rises are special in attention orienting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 36(6), 1099–1122.
53.
ŁukaszewiczB.MołczanowJ. (2018a). Leftward and rightward stress iteration in Ukrainian: Acoustic evidence and theoretical implications. In CzaplickiB.ŁukaszewiczB.OpalińskaM. (Eds.), Phonology, fieldwork, generalisations (pp. 259–275). Peter Lang.
54.
ŁukaszewiczB.MołczanowJ. (2018b). Rhythmic stress in Ukrainian: Acoustic evidence of a bidirectional system. Journal of Linguistics, 54(2), 367–388.
55.
ŁukaszewiczB.MołczanowJ. (2018c). The role of vowel parameters in defining lexical and subsidiary stress in Ukrainian. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 54(3), 355–375.
MajorR. C. (2008). Transfer in second language phonology: A review. In Hansen EdwardsJ. G.ZampiniM. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 63–94). John Benjamins.
58.
McQueenJ. M.ViebahnM. (2007). Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(5), 661–671.
59.
MennenI. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In Delais-RoussarieE.AvanziM.HermentS. (Eds.), Prosody and language in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition and languages in multilingual situations (pp. 171–188). Springer.
60.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P. (2013). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning (pp. 339–364). Psychology Press.
61.
MooshammerC. (2010). Acoustic and laryngographic measures of the laryngeal reflexes of linguistic prominence and vocal effort in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(2), 1047–1058.
62.
MooshammerC.GengC. (2008). Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38(2), 117–136.
63.
MückeD.GriceM. (2014). The effect of focus marking on supralaryngeal articulation: Is it mediated by accentuation?Journal of Phonetics, 44, 47–61.
64.
MückeD.GriceM.BeckerJ.HermesA. (2009). Sources of variation in tonal alignment: Evidence from acoustic and kinematic data. Journal of Phonetics, 37(3), 321–338.
65.
NagleC. L. (2018). Examining the temporal structure of the perception–production link in second language acquisition: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(1), 234–270.
66.
KarpińskiM.AndreevaB.AsuE. L.DaugavetA.BěnǔsŠ.MádyK. (2020). Central and Eastern Europe. In GussenhovenC.ChenA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody (pp. 225–235). Oxford University Press.
67.
OdlinT. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge University Press.
68.
Ortega-LlebariaM.GuH.FanJ. (2013). English speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3–4), 186–197.
69.
PetersJ. (2008). Intonation deutscher Regionalsprachen [Intonation in German regional varieties] (Vol. 21). Walter de Gruyter.
70.
PierrehumbertJ. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation [PhD thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
71.
PierrehumbertJ. B.HirschbergJ. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In CohenP. R.MorganJ.PollackM. E. (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271–311). MIT Press.
72.
Pompino-MarschallB.SteriopoloE.ŻygisM. (2017). Ukrainian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 47(3), 349–357.
73.
PorrettaV.KyröläinenA.-J.van RijJ.JärvikiviJ. (2020). VWPre: Tools for preprocessing visual world data (R package version 1.2.4). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=VWPre
74.
ProtopapasA.PanagakiE.AndrikopoulouA.éGuti rrez PalmaN.ArvanitiA. (2016). Priming stress patterns in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(11), 1739.
75.
RasierL.HiligsmannP. (2007). Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise, 28(2007), 41–66.
76.
ReinischE.JesseA.McQueenJ. M. (2010). Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye movements immediately. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 772–783.
77.
RindalU. (2010). Constructing identity with l2: Pronunciation and attitudes among Norwegian learners of English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(2), 240–261.
78.
RoessigS. (2024). The inverse relation of pre-nuclear and nuclear prominences in German. Laboratory Phonology, 15(1), 1–43.
79.
RoessigS.WinterB.MückeD. (2022). Tracing the phonetic space of prosodic focus marking. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 842546.
80.
SchertzJ.ClareE. J. (2020). Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 11(2), Article e1521.
81.
SchmidtL. B. (2020). Role of developing language attitudes in a study abroad context on adoption of dialectal pronunciations. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 785–806.
82.
SchützeC. T.SprouseJ. (2013). Judgment data. In PodesvaR. J.SharmaD. (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 27–51). Cambridge University Press.
83.
SeverijnenG. G.BoskerH. R.PiaiV.McQueenJ. M. (2021). Listeners track talker-specific prosody to deal with talker-variability. Brain Research, 1769, Article 147605.
84.
Shattuck-HufnagelS.TurkA. (1998). The domain of phrase-final lengthening in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(5), 1235–1236.
85.
SluijterA. (1995). Phonetic correlates of stress and accent, volume 15 of HIL dissertations. Holland Academic Graphics.
86.
SparksR. L.HumbachN.PattonJ.GanschowL. (2011). Subcomponents of second-language aptitude and second-language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 253–273.
87.
TakahashiC.KaoS.BaekH.YeungA. H.HwangJ.BroselowE. (2018). Native and non-native speaker processing and production of contrastive focus prosody. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 3, 35–31.
88.
TanenhausM. K.Spivey-KnowltonM. J.EberhardK. M.SedivyJ. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
89.
Toc’kaN. I. (1969). Zvukova charakterystyka sučasnoji ukrajins’koji literaturnoji movy. Holosni zvuky [Acoustic description of contemporary standard Ukrainian: Vowel sounds]. In BilodidI. K. (Ed.), Sučasna ukrajins’ka literaturna mova. Vstup. Fonetyka [Contemporary Ukrainian Literary Language. Introduction. Phonetics] (pp. 50–130). Naukova Dumka.
90.
TremblayA. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 553–584.
91.
TremblayA.BroersmaM.ZengY.KimH.LeeJ.ShinS. (2021). Dutch listeners’ perception of English lexical stress: A cue-weighting approach. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149(6), 3703–3714.
92.
TrouvainJ.BraunB. (2020). Sentence prosody in a second language. In GussenhovenC.ChenA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody (pp. 605–618). Oxford University Press.
93.
TurcoG.DimrothC.BraunB. (2015). Prosodic and lexical marking of contrast in L2 Italian. Second Language Research, 31(4), 465–491.
94.
TurkA.NakaiS.SugaharaM. (2006). Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research. In SudhoffS. (Ed.), Language context and cognition: Methods in empirical prosody research (pp. 1–28). De Gruyter.
95.
van HeuvenV. J. (2019). Acoustic correlates and perceptual cues of word and sentence stress: Towards a cross-linguistic perspective (Chapter 1, pp. 15–60). Cambridge University Press.
WagnerP.TrouvainJ.ZimmererF. (2015). In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research. Journal of Phonetics, 48, 1–12.
98.
WangC.FlemmingK.WangY.PutkinenV.TervaniemiM.LammertJ.TaoS.JoanisseM. F. (2023). The effect of second language immersion and musical experiences on second language speech processing and general auditory processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 68, Article 101158.
99.
WoodS. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 73(1), 3–36.
100.
WoodS. N. (2017). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
101.
WrembelM. (2010). L2-accented speech in L3 production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 75–90.
102.
XuY. (2010). In defense of lab speech. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 329–336.
ZahnerK.KutscheidS.BraunB. (2019). Alignment of f0 peak in different pitch accent types affects perception of metrical stress. Journal of Phonetics, 74, 75–95.
105.
Zahner-RitterK.ZhaoT.EinfeldtM.BraunB. (2022). How experience with tone in the native language affects the L2 acquisition of pitch accents. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 903879.
106.
ZerbianS. (2015). Markedness considerations in L2 prosodic focus and givenness marking. In Delais-RoussarieE.AvanziM.HermentS. (Eds.), Prosody and language in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition and languages in multilingual situations (pp. 7–27). Springer.
