This commentary discusses Westergaard’s (2021) keynote article, which presents a comprehensive model of first language (L1), second language (L2), and third language (L3) acquisition. The commentary presents evidence from a previous study of L3 learners that provides support for Westergaard’s property-by-property transfer proposal. The commentary highlights strengths of the proposal, such as its focus on microvariation, and also outlines open questions, such as whether the model can predict in advance whether specific properties will be easier or harder to acquire.
ComrieB (1989) Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd edition.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
GabrieleA (2009) Transfer and transition in the SLA of aspect: A bidirectional study of learners of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition31: 371–402.
3.
GabrieleA (2010) Deriving meaning through context: The interpretation of bare nominals in L2 Japanese. Second Language Research26: 379–405.
4.
GabrieleAMcClureW (2011) Why only some imperfectives are learned imperfectly. Language Acquisition18: 39–83.
5.
KulundaryVGabrieleA (2012) Examining the role of syntactic development in the L2 on the acquisition of an L3: A look at relative clauses. In: Cabrelli-AmaroJFlynnSRothmanJ (eds) Third language acquisition in adulthood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 195–222.
6.
LardiereD (2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research25: 173–227.
7.
MongushV (2010) What transfers in third language acquisition? An examination of relative clauses. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Kansas, TX, USA.
8.
Puig-MayencoEGonzález AlonsoJRothmanJ (2020) A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research36: 31–64.
9.
RothmanJGonzález AlonsoJPuig-MayencoE (2019) Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
SlabakovaR (2017) The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism21: 651–65.
11.
WestergaardM (2021) Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research37(3): 379–407.
12.
WestergaardMMitrofanovaNMykhaylykRRodinaY (2017) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism21: 666–82.
13.
WhiteL (2009) Some questions about feature re-assembly. Second Language Research25: 343–48.
