Turtles all the way down: Micro-cues and piecemeal transfer in L3 phonology and syntax

Abstract

There are several theories which tackle predicting the source of third language (L3) crosslinguistic influence. The two orthogonal questions that arise are which language is most likely to influence the L3 and whether the influence will be wholesale or piecemeal (property-by-property). To my mind, Westergaard’s Linguistic Proximity Model (LPM) is preferable to other theoretical models (say Rothman’s Typological Primacy Model) insofar as it is consistent with many aspects of L2/L3 phonological learnability that I am familiar with. Westergaard proposes a structure-based piecemeal approach to the explanation of third language acquisition (L3A). The model is driven by parsing and dictates that the first language (L1) or second language (L2) structure which is hypothesized to be most similar to the L3 structure will be the one to transfer.

Keywords

blame assignment L3 phonology LPM

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archibald

(2017) Second language processing and linguistic theory. In: Aronoff

(ed) Oxford research encyclopedia in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Archibald

(2018) Advanced level phonology. In: Malovrh

Benati

(eds) The Blackwell handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 241–63.

Archibald

(2019) Assessing linguistic I-proximity in L3 phonology. Unpublished article, Workshop on Third Language Acquisition, June, University of Konstanz, Germany.

Archibald

Yousefi

(2018) The redeployment of marked L1 Persian codas in the acquisition of marked L2 English onsets: Redeployment as a transition theory. Unpublished paper presented at the 3rd Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCALL), University of Indiana, IN, USA.

Benrabah

(1991) Learning English segments with two languages. In: Actes du XIIème Congrès International des Sciences Phonétiques. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, pp. 334–37

Blanco-Elorrieta

Emmorey

Pylkkänen

(2018) Language switching decomposed through MEG and evidence from bimodal bilinguals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115: 9708–13.

Dresher

(1999) Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 27–67.

Dresher

(2009) The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dresher

Kaye

(1990) A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34: 137–95.

10.

Fodor

(1998) Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 1–36.

11.

Goad

(2016) Phonotactic evidence from typology and acquisition for a coda+onset analysis of initial sC clusters. In: Kim

Umbal

Block

, et al (eds) Proceedings of 33rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 17–28.

12.

Mackenzie

(2011) Contrast and the evaluation of similarity: Evidence from consonant harmony. Lingua 121: 1401–23.

13.

Pinker

(1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

14.

Rothman

(2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18: 179–90.

15.

Rothman

González Alonso

Puig-Mayenco

(2019) Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Vaux

Wolfe

(2009) The appendix. In: Raimy

Cairns

(eds) Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 101–43.

17.

Westergaard

(2021) Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research 37(3): 379–407.

18.

Westergaard

Mitrofanova

Mykhaylyk

(2017) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism 21: 666–82.

19.

Wexler

Culicover

(1980) Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

20.

Yang

(2017) Rage against the machine: evaluation metrics in the 21st century. Language Acquisition 24: 100–25.

21.

Yang

(2018) A formalist perspective on language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8: 665–706.