To have more information about the English words known by second language (L2) speakers, we ran a large-scale crowdsourcing vocabulary test, which yielded 17 million useful responses. It provided us with a list of 445 words known to nearly all participants. The list was compared to various existing lists of words advised to include in the first stages of English L2 teaching. The data also provided us with a ranking of 61,000 words in terms of degree and speed of word recognition in English L2 speakers, which correlated r = .85 with a similar ranking based on native English speakers. The L2 speakers in our study were relatively better at academic words (which are often cognates in their mother tongue) and words related to experiences English L2 students are likely to have. They were worse at words related to childhood and family life. Finally, a new list of 20 levels of 1,000 word families is presented, which will be of use to English L2 teachers, as the levels represent the order in which English vocabulary seems to be acquired by L2 learners across the world.
AguasvivasJCarreirasMBrysbaertM, et al. (2020) How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy. Behavior Research Methods. Epub ahead of print 18 February 2020. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01357-9.
2.
BalotaDAYapMJHutchisonKA, et al. (2007) The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods39: 445–59.
3.
BauerLNationP (1993) Word families. International Journal of Lexicography6: 253–79.
4.
BenignoVde JongJ (2019) Linking vocabulary to the CEFR and the Global Scale of English: A psychometric model. In: HuhtaAEricksonGFiguerasN (eds) Developments in language education: A memorial volume in honour of Sauli Takala. Jyväskylä: University Printing House, pp. 8–29.
5.
BergerCMCrossleySAKyleK (2017) Using native-speaker psycholinguistic norms to predict lexical proficiency and development in second-language production. Applied Linguistics40: 22–42.
6.
BrezinaVGablasovaD (2015) Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list. Applied Linguistics36: 1–22.
7.
BrowneC (2014) A new general service list: The better mousetrap we’ve been looking for. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction3: 1–10.
8.
BrysbaertMNewB (2009) Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods41: 977–90.
9.
BrysbaertMKeuleersEManderaP (2019a) Recognition times for 54 thousand Dutch words: Data from the Dutch crowdsourcing project. Psychologica Belgica59: 281–300.
10.
BrysbaertMLagrouEStevensM (2017) Visual word recognition in a second language: A test of the lexical entrenchment hypothesis with lexical decision times. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition20: 530–48.
11.
BrysbaertMWarrinerABKupermanV (2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods46: 904–11.
12.
BrysbaertMManderaPMcCormickSFKeuleersE (2019b) Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods51: 467–79.
13.
BrysbaertMStevensMManderaPKeuleersE (2016) How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in Psychology7: 1116.
14.
CapelA (2012) Completing the English vocabulary profile: C1 and C2 vocabulary. English Profile Journal3: e1.
15.
CobbT (2007) Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading. Language Learning and Technology11: 38–63.
16.
CobbT (2016) Numbers or numerology? A response to Nation (2014) and McQuillan (2016). Reading in a Foreign Language28: 299–304.
17.
CoxheadA (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly34: 213–38.
18.
DangTNYWebbSCoxheadA (2020) Evaluating lists of high-frequency words: Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 3 April 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1362168820911189.
19.
De WildeVBrysbaertMEyckmansJ (2020) Learning English through out-of-school exposure: Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition23: 171–85.
20.
DürlichLFrançoisT (2018) EFLLex: A graded lexical resource for learners of English as a foreign language. In: CalzolariNChoukriKCieriC, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2018). Paris: European Language Resources Association. Available at: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1140 (accessed June 2020).
21.
FerréPBrysbaertM (2017) Can Lextale-Esp discriminate between groups of highly proficient Catalan–Spanish bilinguals with different language dominances?Behavior Research Methods49: 717–23.
22.
GardnerDDaviesM (2014) A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics35 :305–27.
23.
GinesteRLagraveR (1961) Le français fondamental par l’action [Fundamental French by action]. Paris: Edition Didier.
24.
HarringtonMCareyM (2009) The on-line yes/no test as a placement tool. System37: 614–26.
25.
HashimotoBJEgbertJ (2019) More than frequency? Exploring predictors of word difficulty for second language learners. Language Learning69: 839–72.
26.
HeXGodfroidA (2019) Choosing words to teach: A novel method for vocabulary selection and its practical application. TESOL Quarterly53: 348–71.
27.
KeuleersE (2018) A transaction perspective on the language environment (Plenary). Unpublished paper presented at 4th Usage Based Linguistics Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel.
28.
KeuleersEBrysbaertM (2010) Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods42: 627–33.
29.
KeuleersMStevensMManderaPBrysbaertM (2015) Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology68: 1665–92.
30.
KönigJCaludeASCoxheadA (2019) Using character-grams to automatically generate pseudowords and how to evaluate them. Applied Linguistics. Epub ahead of print 3 October 2019. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amz045.
31.
KupermanVStadthagen-GonzalezHBrysbaertM (2012) Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words. Behavior Research Methods44: 978–90.
32.
LauferBNationISP (2012) Vocabulary. In: GassSMMackeyA (eds) The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. London: Routledge, pp. 163–76.
33.
LauferBRavenhorst-KalovskiGC (2010) Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language22: 15–30.
34.
LemhöferKBroersmaM (2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods44: 325–43.
35.
ManderaPKeuleersEBrysbaertM (2020) Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English crowdsourcing project. Behavior Research Methods52: 741–60.
36.
MearaPMBuxtonB (1987) An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests. Language Testing4: 142–54.
37.
NationISP (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?Canadian Modern Language Review63: 59–82.
38.
NationISPWaringR (1997) Vocabulary size, text coverage and words lists. In: SchmittNMcCarthyM (eds) Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6–19.
39.
UemuraTIshikawaSI (2004) JACET 8000 and Asia TEFL vocabulary initiative. Journal of Asia TEFL1: 333–47.
40.
UllmanMT (2001) The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and cognition4: 105–22.
41.
Van OverscheldeJPRawsonKADunloskyJ (2004) Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the norms. Journal of Memory and Language50: 289–335.
42.
WebbSAChangACS (2012) Second language vocabulary growth. RELC Journal43: 113–26.
43.
WestM (1953) A general service list of English words. London: Longman, Green.
44.
WilliamsJRebuschatP (2017) Implicit learning and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
45.
ZhangXLiuJAiH (2020) Pseudowords and guessing in the yes/no format vocabulary test. Language Testing37: 6–30.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
