This study examined how language proficiency and age of acquisition affect a bilingual language user’s reliance on the dominant language during lexical access. Two bilingual groups performed a translation recognition task: Mandarin–English classroom bilinguals who acquired their dominant language (Mandarin) from birth and their non-dominant language (English) post-puberty through formal classroom instruction, and Mandarin–English heritage bilinguals who acquired their non-dominant language (Mandarin) at home from birth but became more dominant in another language (English) through society and peers. Participants decided whether word pairs were correct translations as quickly and accurately as possible. Critical trials involved correct translations (e.g. 房东 – landlord) and incorrect translations that were related to the correct translation in meaning (e.g. 房东 – rent) or form (e.g. 房东 – lantern). When identifying correct translations, lower proficiency heritage bilinguals were slower and less accurate than higher proficiency classroom bilinguals. Yet, when rejecting incorrect translations, heritage bilinguals demonstrated a greater magnitude of semantically-related interference than classroom bilinguals. Heritage bilinguals additionally demonstrated small but measurable amounts of form-related interference whereas the classroom bilinguals did not. Heritage bilinguals thus showed unique patterns of lexical access distinct from bilinguals who acquired their non-dominant language at a later age in a classroom setting.
AltarribaJMathisKM (1997) Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language36: 550–68.
2.
AuTKKnightlyLMJunSAOhJS (2002) Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science13: 238–43.
3.
BabjackDLCernickyBSobotkaAJet al. (2015) Reducing audio stimulus presentation latencies across studies, laboratories, and hardware and operating system configurations. Behavior Research Methods47: 649–65.
4.
BatesDMächlerMBolkerBWalkerS (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48.
5.
BrintonDMKaganOBauckusS (2017) Heritage language education: A new field emerging. Abingdon: Routledge.
6.
BrysbaertMNewB (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods41: 977–90.
7.
CaiQBrysbaertM (2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS one5: e10729.
8.
ChangCB (2016) Bilingual perceptual benefits of experience with a heritage language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition19: 791–809.
9.
ChangCBYaoY (2016) Toward an understanding of heritage prosody: Acoustic and perceptual properties of tone produced by heritage, native, and second language speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal13: 134–60.
10.
ChangCBYaoYHaynesEFRhodesR (2011) Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America129: 3964–80.
11.
ChenT (2019) Radical awareness development of L2 Chinese learners in the US. In: YuanFLiS (eds) Classroom research on Chinese as a second language. New York: Routledge, pp. 155–70.
12.
DeFrancisJ (1986) The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
13.
De GrootAM (1992) Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18: 1001–18.
14.
De GrootAMComijsH (1995) Translation recognition and translation production: Comparing a new and an old tool in the study of bilingualism. Language Learning45: 467–509.
15.
DijkstraTVan HeuvenWJ (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition5: 175–97.
16.
DuanmuS (2007) The phonology of standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
EngleRWCantorJCarulloJJ (1992) Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18: 972–92.
18.
FerréPSánchez-CasasRGuaschM (2006) Can a horse be a donkey? Semantic and form interference effects in translation recognition in early and late proficient and nonproficient Spanish-Catalan bilinguals. Language Learning56: 571–608.
19.
GrosjeanF (1988) Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes3: 233–74.
20.
GuoTMisraMTamJWKrollJF (2012) On the time course of accessing meaning in a second language: An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of translation recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition38: 1165–86.
21.
HernandezALiPMacWhinneyB (2005) The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. TRENDS in Cognitive Science9: 220–25.
22.
KanRTSchmidMS (2019) Development of tonal discrimination in young heritage speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Phonetics73: 40–54.
23.
KeSKodaK (2017) Is vocabulary knowledge sufficient for word-meaning inference? An investigation of the role of morphological awareness in adult L2 learners of Chinese. Applied Linguistics40: 456–77.
24.
KodaKZhangYYangCL (2008) Literacy development in Chinese as a heritage language. In: HeAWXiaoY (eds) Chinese as a heritage language: Fostering rooted world citizenry. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center, pp. 137–49.
25.
KrollJFStewartE (1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language33: 149–74.
26.
KrollJFTokowiczN (2001) The development of conceptual representation for words in a second language. In: NicolJ (ed.) One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 49–71.
27.
KuznetsovaABrockhoffPBChristensenRHB (2017) lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software82: 1–26.
28.
LinckJAKrollJFSundermanGL (2009) Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science20: 1507–15.
29.
LinckJAOsthusPKoethJTBuntingMF (2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review21: 861–83.
30.
MaFChenPGuoTKrollJ (2017) When late second language learners access the meaning of L2 words: Using ERPs to investigate the role of the L1 translation equivalent. Journal of Neurolinguistics41: 50–69.
31.
MarianVBlumenfeldHKKaushanskayaM (2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research50: 940–67.
32.
MontrulS (2010) Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics30: 3–23.
33.
MontrulS (2015) The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
PackardJL (1999) Lexical access in Chinese speech comprehension and production. Brain and Language68: 89–94.
35.
PackardJL (2000) The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PerfettiCATanLH (1998) The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition24: 101–18.
37.
PolinskyMKaganO (2007) Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass1: 368–95.
38.
R Core Team (2017) R Foundation for Statistical Computing [online]. Vienna.
39.
ShookAMarianV (2013) The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition16: 304–24.
40.
StroopJR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology18: 643–62.
41.
SundermanGLKrollJF (2006) First language activation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition28: 387–422.
42.
SundermanGLPriyaK (2012) Translation recognition in highly proficient Hindi–English bilinguals: The influence of different scripts but connectable phonologies. Language and Cognitive Processes27: 1265–85.
43.
TalamasAKrollJFDufourR (1999) From form to meaning: Stages in the acquisition of second-language vocabulary. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2: 45–58.
44.
ThierryGWuYJ (2007) Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104: 12530–35.
45.
TokowiczN (2014) Lexical processing and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
46.
TsengAMChangL-YTokowiczN (2014) Translation ambiguity between English and Mandarin Chinese: The roles of proficiency and word characteristics. In: SchwieterJWFerreiraA (eds) The development of translation competence: Theories and methodologies from psycholinguistics and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 107–65.
47.
TurnerMLEngleRW (1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language28: 127–54.
48.
WenYvan HeuvenWJ (2017) Chinese translation norms for 1,429 English words. Behavior Research Methods49: 1006–19.
49.
WuYJCristinoFLeekCThierryG (2013) Non-selective lexical access in bilinguals is spontaneous and independent of input monitoring: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognition129: 418–25.
50.
XiaoY (2006) Heritage learners in the Chinese language classroom: Home background. Heritage Language Journal4: 47–56.
51.
ZhouXMarslen-WilsonW (1994) Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes9: 393–422.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
