This study investigated the effect of first language (L1) on the reading of modifier–head case agreement in second language (L2) Finnish by native Russian and Chinese speakers. Russian is similar to Finnish in that both languages use case endings to mark grammatical roles, whereas such markings are absent in Chinese. The critical nouns were embedded in sentences, where the head noun was either preceded by an agreeing modifier or the modifier was absent. Readers’ eye fixation patterns were used as indices of online processing. Both natives and non-natives showed a facilitatory effect of agreement; reading head nouns was easier when they were preceded by an agreeing modifier. Typological distance in terms of the structural complexity of words between L1 and L2 did not influence the processing.
AikhenvaldA (2000) Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AkhutinaTKurganskyAPolinskyM. (1999) Processing of gender in a three-gender system: Experimental evidence from Russian. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research28: 695–713.
3.
BarberHCarreirasM (2013) Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience17: 137–53.
4.
BaxS (2013) The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: Evidence from eye-tracking. Language Testing30: 441–65.
5.
ClahsenHFelserC (2006a) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics27: 3–42.
6.
ClahsenHFelserC (2006b) Continuity and shallow structures in language processing: A reply to our commentators. Applied Psycholinguistics27: 107–26.
7.
ClahsenHFelserC (2006c) How native-like is non-native language processing?Trends in Cognitive Sciences10: 564–70.
8.
CorbettG (1991) Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
DavidsonDJHanulíkováAIndefreyP (2012) Electrophysiological correlates of morphosyntactic integration in German phrasal context. Language and Cognitive Processes27: 288–311.
10.
FelserDMarinisTClahsenH (2003) Children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition11: 127–63.
11.
Gillon-DowensMGuoTGuoJ. (2011) Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish: Evidence from event related potentials. Neuropsychologia49: 1651–59.
12.
Gillon-DowensMVergaraMBarberH. (2009) Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience22: 1870–87.
13.
GodfroidABoersFHousenA (2013) Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition in late second-language learners by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition35: 483–517.
14.
GurjanovMLukatelaGMoscovljevicJ. (1985) Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by inflected adjectives. Cognition19: 55–71.
15.
HyönäJHujanenH (1997) Effects of case marking and word order on sentence parsing in Finnish: An eye fixation analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology50A: 841–58.
16.
HyönäJLindemanJ (1994) Syntactic context effects on word recognition: A developmental study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology35: 27–37.
17.
ItkonenEPajunenA (2011) A few remarks on World Atlas of Language Structures. In: ItkonenE (Ed.) Papers on typological linguistics. Publications in General Linguistics 15: University of Turku, 102–39.
18.
KeatingG (2009) Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and non-native Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning59: 503–35.
19.
KempeVMacWhinneyB (1998) The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition20: 543–87.
LaineMVirtanenP (1999) WordMill lexical search program [computer software]. Turku: Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience University of Turku.
22.
LaineMVainioSHyönäJ (1999) Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language40: 109–35.
23.
LaurantoY (1996) Elämän suolaa. Suomen kielen alkeita 1 [Basics of Finnish]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
24.
Lew-WilliamsCFernaldA (2010) Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language63: 447–64.
25.
LiCThompsonS (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
MiwaKDijkstraTBolgerP. (in press) Reading English with Japanese in mind: Effects of frequency phonology and meaning in different-script bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
27.
O’GradyW (2013) The illusion of language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism3: 253–85.
28.
RaynerK (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin124: 372–422.
29.
RobertsLSiyanova-ChanturiaA (2013) Using eye-tracking to investigate topics in L2 acquisition and L2 sentence and discourse processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition35: 213–35.
30.
SabourinLStoweL A (2008) Second language processing: When are L1 and L2 processed similarly. Second Language Research24: 397–430.
31.
SagarraNHerschensohnJ (2011) Proficiency and animacy effects on L2 gender agreement processes during comprehension. Language Learning61: 80–116.
32.
Siyanova-ChanturiaAConklinKSchmittN (2011) Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research27: 251–72.
33.
SulkalaHKarjalainenM (1992) Finnish. New York: Routledge.
34.
TarabanRKempeV (1999) Gender processing in native and non-native Russian speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics20: 119–48.
35.
TrenkicDMirkovicJAltmannG (2014) Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second languageBilingualism: Language and Cognition17: 237–57.
36.
VainioSBertramRPajunenA. (2011) Processing modifier–head agreement in long Finnish words: Evidence from eye movementsActa Linguistica Hungarica58: 134–56.
37.
VainioSHyönäJPajunenA (2003) Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of grammatical agreement: Evidence from readers’ eye fixation patterns. Brain and Language85: 97–202.
38.
VainioSHyönäJPajunenA (2008) Processing modifier–head agreement in reading: Evidence for a delayed effect of agreement. Memory and Cognition36: 329–40.
39.
VainioSPajunenAHyönäJ (2014) L1 and L2 word recognition in Finnish: Examining L1 effects on L2 processing of morphological complexity and morphophonological transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition36: 133–62.
40.
VirtanenPPajunenA (2000) ContextMill [computer software]. Turku: General Linguistics, University of Turku.
41.
WhiteL (1997) Suomen kielioppia ulkomaalaisille [Finnish grammar for foreign language learners]. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.
