A study was conducted to identify the scope and timing of maturational constraints in three linguistic domains within the same individuals, as well as the potential mediating roles of amount of second language (L2) exposure and language aptitude at different ages in different domains. Participants were 65 Chinese learners of Spanish and 12 native speaker controls. Results for three learner groups defined by age of onset (AO) – 3–6, 7–15, and 16–29 years – confirmed previous findings of windows of opportunity closing first for L2 phonology, then for lexis and collocation and, finally, in the mid-teens, for morphosyntax. All three age functions exhibited the discontinuities in the rate of decline with increasing AO associated with sensitive periods. Significant correlations were found between language aptitude, measured using the LLAMA test (Meara, 2005), and pronunciation scores, and between language aptitude and lexis and collocation scores, in the AO 16–29 group.
AbrahamssonNHyltenstamK (2008) The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition30: 481–509.
2.
AbrahamssonNHyltenstamK (2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning59: 249–306.
3.
AronAAronENCoupsEJ (2005) Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course, 3rd edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
4.
BialystokEHakutaK (1999) Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In: BirdsongD (ed.) Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 161–181.
5.
BialystokEMillerB (1999) The problem of age in second-language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2: 127–145.
6.
BirdsongD (2005) Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In: KrollJde GrootAMB (eds) Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–127.
7.
BirdsongD (2006) Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning56: 9–49.
8.
BirdsongD (2009) Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In: RitchieWCBhatiaTK (eds) The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 401–424.
9.
BirdsongDMolisM (2001) On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language44: 235–249.
10.
BongaertsT (1999) Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In: BirdsongD (ed.) Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 133–159.
11.
BylundE (2009) Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning59: 687–715.
12.
BylundEAbrahamssonNHyltenstamK (2010) The role of language aptitude in first language attrition: The case of pre-pubescent attriters. Applied Linguistics31: 443–464.
13.
CarrollJBSaponS (1959) Modern Language Aptitude Test: Form A. New York: Psychological Corporation.
14.
CrystalD (1975) The English Tone of Voice. London: Edward Arnold.
15.
DeKeyserR (2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition22: 499–533.
16.
DeKeyserR (2012) Age effects in second language learning. In: GassSMMackeyA (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 442–460.
17.
DeKeyserRLarson-HallJ (2005) What does the Critical Period really mean? In: KrollJFDeGrootAMB (eds) Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–108.
18.
DeKeyserRAlfi-ShabtayIRavidD (2010) Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age-effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics31: 413–438.
19.
DonaldsonB (2011) Left-dislocation in near-native French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition33: 399–432.
20.
DoughtyCJ (2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In: DoughtyCJLongMH (eds) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Basil Blackwell, pp. 256–310.
21.
EllisNC (2008) The psycholinguistics of the Interaction Hypothesis. In: MackeyAPolioC(eds) Multiple Perspectives on Interaction in SLA: Second Language Research in Honor of Susan M. Gass. New York: Routledge, pp. 11–40.
22.
FathmanA (1975) The relationship between age and second language productive ability. Language Learning25: 245–266.
23.
FlegeJEMunroMJMackayRA (1995a) Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America97: 3125–34.
24.
FlegeJETakakiNMannVA (1995b) Japanese adults can learn to pronounce English /r/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech38: 25–55.
25.
FlegeJEYeni-KomshianGLiuH (1999) Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language41: 78–104.
26.
GranenaG (2012) Age differences and cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning in ultimate L2 attainment. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
27.
GranenaG (to appear, 2013a) Cognitive aptitudes for L2 learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test: What aptitude does the LLAMA measure? In GranenaGLongMH (eds) Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
28.
GranenaG (to appear, 2013b) Reexamining the robustness of aptitude in second language acquisition. In GranenaGLongMH (eds) Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
29.
HarleyBHartD (2002) Age, aptitude, and second language learning on a bilingual exchange. In: RobinsonP (ed.) Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 302–30.
30.
HerschensohnJ (2007) Language Development and Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HoyerWJLincourtAE (1998) Ageing and the Development of Learning. In: StadlerMAFrenschPA (eds) Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 445–470.
32.
HyltenstamK (1988) Lexical characteristics of near-native L2 learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development9: 67–84.
33.
HyltenstamK (1992) Non-native features of non-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In: HarrisRJ (ed.) Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. New York: Elsevier, pp. 351–68.
34.
HyltenstamKAbrahamssonN (2003) Maturational constraints in SLA. In: DoughtyCJLongMH (eds) Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. London: Blackwell, pp. 539–588.
35.
JiaG (1998) Beyond brain maturation: The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition revisited. Unpublished PhD thesis, New York University, USA.
36.
JiaGFuseA (2007) Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research50: 1280–1299.
37.
JohnsonJSNewportEL (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology21: 60–99.
38.
KellerR (1979) Gambits: Conversational strategy signals. Journal of Pragmatics3: 219–237.
39.
KellermanE (1978) Giving learners a break: Native language intuitions as a source of predictions about transferability. Working Papers in Bilingualism15: 59–92.
40.
KrashenSLongMHScarcellaR (1979) Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly13: 573–582.
41.
LeeJ (1998) Is there a sensitive period for second language collocational knowledge? Unpublished MA thesis, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI, USA.
42.
LongMH (1990) Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition12: 251–285.
43.
LongMH (2003) Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In: DoughtyCJLongMH (eds) Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 487–535.
44.
LongMH (2005) Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. IRAL43: 287–317.
45.
LongMH (2007) Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
LongMH (2010) Towards a cognitive-interactionist theory of instructed adult SLA. Plenary address to the 30th Second Language Research Forum, 14–17October. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
47.
Marinova-ToddS (2003) Comprehensive analysis of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
48.
MearaP (2005) LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests. Swansea: Lognostics.
49.
MearaPMiltonJLorenzo-DusN (2003) Swansea Language Aptitude Tests (LAT) v.2.0. Swansea: Lognostics.
50.
MeiselJM (2009) Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft28: 5–34.
51.
MeiselJM (2011) First and Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
MontrulS (2008) Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
53.
MorfordJPMayberryRI (2000) A reexamination of ‘early exposure’ and its implications for language acquisition by eye. In: ChamberlainCMorfordJPMayberryRI (eds) Language acquisition by eye. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 111–127.
54.
MoyerA (2004) Age, Accent, and Experience in Second Language Acquisition: An Integrated Approach to Critical Period Inquiry. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
55.
MoyerA (2009) Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In PiskeTYoung-SholtenM (eds) Input Matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 159–174.
56.
MunnichELandauB (2010) Developmental decline in the acquisition of spatial language. Language Learning and Development6: 32–59.
57.
MuñozCSingletonD (2011) A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching44: 1–35.
58.
NattingerJ (1980) A lexical phrase grammar of ESL. TESOL Quarterly14: 337–344.
59.
NewportEL (1990) Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science14: 11–28.
60.
NewportEL (2002) Critical periods in language development. In: NadelL (ed.) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London: Macmillan, pp. 737–740.
61.
NunnallyJC (1968) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
OyamaS (1976) A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research5: 261–283.
64.
OyamaS (1978) The sensitive period and comprehension of speech. Working Papers on Bilingualism16: 1–17.
65.
ParadisM (2004) A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
66.
PatkowskiMS (1980) The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning30: 449–472.
67.
PawleyASyderF (1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In: RichardJSchmidtR (eds) Language and communication. New York: Longman, pp. 191–225.
68.
PiskeTMacKayIFlegeJE (2001) Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics29: 191–215.
69.
ReberAS (1993) Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
70.
RobinsonP (2002) Individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory during adult incidental second language learning: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991). In: RobinsonP (ed.) Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 211–266.
71.
RobinsonP (2005) Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics25: 46–73.
72.
ScarcellaRHigaC (1981) Input, negotiation, and age differences in second language acquisition. Language Learning31: 409–438.
73.
SchachterJ (1996) Maturation and the issue of universal grammar in second language acquisition. In: RitchieWCBhatiaTJ (eds) Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Academic Press, pp. 159–163.
74.
ScovelT (1988) A Time to Speak: A Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Speech. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
75.
SeligerH (1978) Implications of a multiple critical period hypothesis for second language learning. In: RitchieWC (ed.) Second Language Research: Issues and Implications. New York: Academic Press, pp. 11–19.
76.
SkehanP (1989) Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Arnold.
77.
SkehanP (2002) Theorizing and updating aptitude. In: RobinsonP (ed.) Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 69–93.
78.
SpadaroK (1996) Maturational constraints on lexical acquisition in a second language. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
79.
SpadaroK (2013) Maturational constraints on lexical acquisition in a second language. In: GranenaGLongMH (eds) Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and SLA. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
80.
SpecialeGEllisNCBywaterT (2004) Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics25: 293–321.
81.
TeschnerRV (1983) Spanish gender revisited: -z words as illustrating the need for expanded phonological and morphological analysis. Hispania66: 252–256.
82.
ThompsonI (1991) Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning41: 177–204.
83.
ThompsonSPNewportEL (2007) Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Language Learning and Development3: 1–42.
84.
van BoxtelS (2005) Can the Late Bird Catch the Worm? Ultimate Attainment in L2 Syntax. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap (LOT).
85.
WilliamsJN (2009) Implicit learning. In: RitchieWCBhatiaTK (eds) The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Bingley: Emerald Press, pp. 319–335.
86.
YorioCA (1980) Conventionalized language forms and the development of communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly14: 433–344.
