Finding the match between individuals and educational treatments is the aim of both educators and the aptitude-treatment interaction research paradigm. Using the latent growth curve analysis, the present study investigates the interaction between the type of explicit instructional approaches (deductive vs. explicit-inductive) and the level of foreign language aptitude (high vs. low) in the learning of explicit grammar rules. The results indicate that on the whole the two equally explicit instructional approaches did not differentially affect learning performance. However, when the level of language aptitude, measured by grammatical sensitivity, associative memory, and memory for text (with the last variable being the best measure), was taken into account, low-aptitude learners performed significantly better with the deductive instruction, in the sentence-correction tests. The interaction effects of equally explicit instructional approaches suggest the need for considering aptitude-treatment interaction to maximize learners’ potential for success in second language learning.
AbrahamR.G. (1985). Field independence-dependence and the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 689–702.
2.
AbuseileekA.F. (2009). The effect of using an online-based course on the learning of grammar inductively and deductively. ReCALL, 21, 319–336.
3.
AndersonR.C. (1967). Educational psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 18, 129–164.
4.
AusubelD.P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning: An introduction to school learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
5.
BaronR.M.KennyD A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
6.
BorsD.A.MacLeodC.M. (1996). Individual differences in memory. In BjorkE.L.BjorkR.A. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Volume 10: Memory (pp. 411–441). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
BowlesM.A. (2008). Task type and reactivity of verbal reports in SLA. A first look at a L2 task other than reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 259–387.
8.
BrunerJ.S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
9.
BrunerJ.S. (1973). Beyond the information given: studies in the psychology of knowing. New York: W.W. Norton.
10.
CarrollJ.B.SaponS.M. (1959). Modern language aptitude test (MLAT). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
11.
ChiM.T.H.ReesE. (1983) A learning framework for development. In ChiM.T.H. (Ed.), Trends in memory development research (pp. 71–107). New York: Karger.
12.
ChiesiH.L.SpilichG.J.VossJ.F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 257–273.
13.
ComreyA.L.LeeH.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. 2nd edition.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
CornoL.CronbachL.J.KupermintzH.LohmanD.F.MandinachE.B.PorteusA.W.TalbertJ.E. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CronbachL.J.SnowR.E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
16.
DecooW. (1996). The induction-deduction opposition: Ambiguities and complexities of the didactic reality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 34, 95–118.
17.
de GraaffR. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–297.
18.
DeKeyserR. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 501–514.
19.
DeKeyserR. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguist system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 196–221.
20.
DeKeyserR. (1998). Beyond focus on form. Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DeKeyserR. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In. RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DeKeyserR. (2009). Variable interaction in SLA: Much more than a nuisance. Unpublished paper presented at Second Language Research Forum 2009, Michigan State University, MI, USA.
23.
DoughtyC. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469.
24.
DuncanT.E.DuncanS.C.StryckerL.A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
EgginsJ.A. (1979). The Interaction between structure in learning materials and personality type of learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Indiana University, IN, USA.
26.
ErlamR. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 87, 242–260.
27.
FischerR.A. (1979). The inductive-deductive controversy revisited. Modern Language Journal, 63, 98–105.
28.
FotosS. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 323–351.
29.
FotosS.EllisR. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605–628.
GallegosA.M. (1968). A study and comparison of experimenter pacing and student pacing of programmed instructor. Journal of Education Research, 61, 339–342.
32.
GarrettN. (1986). The problem with grammar: What kind can the language learner use?Modern Language Journal, 70, 133–148.
33.
GascónC.D. (1998). The Spanish psych verb construction: Beginning and intermediate learners’ patterns of usage. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 3, 69–84.
34.
HaightC.HarronC.ColeS. (2007). The effects of deductive and guided inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary foreign language college classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 288–310.
35.
HammerlyH. (1975). The deduction/induction controversy. Modern Language Journal, 75, 15–18.
36.
HancockG.R.LawrenceF.R. (2006). Using latent growth models to evaluate longitudinal change. In HancockG.R.MuellerR.O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 171–196). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
37.
HauptmanP.C. (1971). A structural approach vs. a situational approach to foreign-language teaching. Language Learning, 21, 235–244.
38.
HerronC.TomaselloM. (1992). Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. French Review, 65, 708–718.
39.
HulstijnJ.H.de GraaffR. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97–113.
40.
KyllonenP.C.TirreW.C.ChristalR.E. (1991). Knowledge and processing speed as determinants of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 57–79.
41.
LeowR.P. (1998). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners’ L2 development in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 82, 49–68.
42.
LittleR.J.A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing value. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
43.
López JiménezM.D. (2003). Grammar instruction and the acquisition of gustar-type verb by English-speaking learners of Spanish. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 4, 255–279.
44.
MarrasV.CadiernoT. (2008). Spanish gustar vs. English like: A cognitive analysis of the constructions and its implication for SLA. In TylerA.KimY.TakadaM. (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 233–254). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
45.
McLachlanJ.F.C.HuntD.E. (1973). Differential effects of discovering learning as a function of conceptual level. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 5, 152–160.
46.
MontrulS. (1997). On the parallels between diachronic change and interlanguage grammars: The L2 acquisition of the Spanish dative case system. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 87–113.
47.
NationR.McLaughlinB. (1986). Experts and novices: an information processing approach to the ‘good language learner’ problem. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 41–56.
48.
NorrisJ.OrtegaL. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
49.
NorrisJ.OrtegaL. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51, 157–213.
RandallM. (2007). Memory, psychology, and second language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52.
ReberA.S.KassinS.M.LewisS.CantorG.W. (1980). On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 492–502.
53.
ResnickL.B.NechesR. (1984). Factors affecting individual differences in learning ability. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence: Volume 2 (pp. 275–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54.
RobinsonP. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45–99.
55.
RobinsonP. (2001). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17, 368–392.
56.
RosaE.LeowR.P. (2004). Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. Modern Language Journal, 88, 193–217.
57.
RosaE.O’NeillM.D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511–556.
58.
SawyerM.RantaL. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
ScottV.M. (1989). An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. Modern Language Learning Journal, 73, 14–22.
60.
SeligerH.W. (1975). Inductive method and deductive method in language teaching: A re-examination. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 13, 1–18.
61.
ShafferC. (1989). A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 395–403.
62.
SjöbergK.TropéB. (1969). The value of external direction and individual discovery in learning situations: The learning of a grammatical rule. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 13, 233–240.
63.
SkehanP. (1980). Memory, language aptitude, and second language performance. Polyglot, 2, 1–17.
64.
SkehanP. (1982). Memory and motivation in language aptitude testing. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London, UK.
65.
SkehanP. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
66.
SnowR.E. (1991). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 205–216.
67.
TisakJ.MeredithW. (1990). Descriptive and associative developmental models. In von EyeA. (Ed.), Statistical methods in developmental research: Volume 2 (pp. 387–406). San Diego, CA: Academic.
68.
TomlinsonP.D.HuntD.E. (1971). Differential effects of rule–example order as a function of conceptual level. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 3, 237–245.
69.
VanPattenB. (1985). Communicative value and information processing in second language acquisition. In LarsonP.JuddE.MesserchmittD.S. (Eds.), On TESOL: A brave new world for TESOL (pp. 89–100). Washington, DC: TESOL.
70.
VanPattenB. (1986). Second language acquisition research and the learning/teaching of Spanish: Some research findings and implications. Hispania, 69, 202–216.
71.
VanPattenB. (2003). Input processing in SLA. In VanPattenB. (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72.
VogelS.HerronC.ColeS.YorkH. (2011). Effectiveness of a guided inductive versus a deductive approach on the learning of grammar in the intermediate-level college French classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 353–380.
73.
WescheM.B. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In DillerK. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119–139). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
74.
ZampognaJ.GentileR.J.PapaliaA.GordonR. (1976). Relationships between learning styles and learning environments in selected secondary modern language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 60, 443–448.
75.
ZyzikE. (2006). Learners’ overgeneralization of dative clitics to accusative contexts: Evidence for prototype effects in SLA. In KleeC.A.FaceT.L. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages (pp. 122–134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
