Complexity theory is a field of physics that studies the nature and behavior of complex systems, systems whose elements interact in complex and unpredictable ways. Recent years have seen a number of attempts to extend its scope to the biological and social sciences, and now Larsen-Freeman and Cameron offer a view of applied linguistics from a complexity perspective, claiming to show the relevance of the theory to various aspects of the language sciences. In this review of their book I look at their claims, and point out some of the reasons why these claims do not hold.
Bloom P. ( 2000) How children learn the meaning of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
2.
Cho A.(2009) Ourselves and our interactions: The ultimate physics problem ? Science325: 406-08.
3.
Chomsky N. ( 1971) Problems of knowledge and freedom. New York: Vintage Books.
4.
Cohen J. and Stewart I. ( 1994) The collapse of chaos. London : Viking.
5.
Ellis NC and Larsen-Freeman D. ( 2006) Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics . Applied Linguistics27, 558-589.
6.
Fischer K., Yan Z., and Stewart J. ( 2003) Adult cognitive development: Dynamics in the developmental web. In: Valsiner J and Connolly K (eds) Handbook of developmental psychology. London: Sage.
7.
Fodor JA and Pylyshyn ZW ( 1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis . Cognition28: 3-71.
8.
Ganger J. and Brent MR ( 2004) Reexamining the vocabulary spurt. Developmental Psychology40: 621-32.
9.
Goldberg A. ( 1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Gribbin J. ( 2004) Deep simplicity: Chaos, complexity and the emergence of life. London: Allen Lane.
11.
Herdina P. and Jessner U. ( 2002) A dynamic model of multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
12.
Hohenberger A. and Peltzer-Karpf A. ( 2009) Language learning from the perspective of nonlinear dynamic systems. Linguistics47: 481-511.
13.
Ionin T. ( 2007) DST vs. UG: Can DST account for purely linguistic phenomena?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition10: 27-29.
14.
Keller SH ( 2008) Borrowed knowledge: Chaos theory and the challenge of learning across disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
15.
Larsen-Freeman D. ( 1997) Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition . Applied Linguistics18: 141-65.
16.
Larsen-Freeman D. ( 2002) Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In: Kramsch C (ed.) Language acquisition and language socialization. London : Continuum.
17.
Larsen-Freeman D. ( 2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics27: 590-619.
18.
Larsen-Freeman D. ( 2007) On the complementarity of chaos/complexity theory and dynamic systems theory in understanding the second language acquisition process . Bilingualism: Language and Cognition10: 35-37.
19.
Maratsos M. ( 2000) More overregularizations after all: New data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen and Xu. Journal of Child Language27: 183-212.
20.
Marcus GF, Pinker S., Ullman M., Hollander M., Rosen TJ, and Xu F. ( 1992) Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial number 228, volume 57, number 4. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Maslen RJC, Theakston AL, Lieven EVM, and Tomasello M. ( 2004) A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research47: 1319-33.
22.
McMurray B. ( 2007) Defusing the childhood vocabulary explosion. Science317: 631.
23.
Meara P. ( 1997) Towards a new approach to modelling vocabulary acquisition . In: Schmitt N and McCarthy M (eds) Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109-21.
24.
Norton A. ( 1995) Dynamics: An introduction. In Port RF and van Gelder T (eds) Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT , 45-58.
25.
O’Grady W. ( 2005) Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
26.
Plaza-Pust C. ( 2008) Dynamic Systems Theory and Universal Grammar: Holding up a turbulent mirror to development in grammars. Modern Language Journal92: 250-69.
27.
Port RF and van Gelder T (eds) (1995) Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
28.
Sober E. ( 1994) Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism . In: Sober E (ed.) From a biological point of view: Essays in evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 201-32.
29.
Thelen E. and Smith LB ( 1994) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
