This study examined whether a younger starting age is advantageous in a situation of minimal exposure to an instructed foreign language (≤ 4 hours classroom contact per week). Previous theoretical and empirical studies indicated there should be no advantage for an earlier start. Japanese college students who started studying English between ages three and twelve (n = 61) were examined on a phonemic discrimination ( /l/w) and grammaticality judgement task (GJT). After controlling for language aptitude and amount of input, statistical correlations were found between starting age and scores on the GJT (r = —.38) but not the phonemic task (r = .03). These earlier starters were also compared to peers who began study in junior high at age twelve or thirteen (n = 139) on the same measures. The earlier starters were found to score statistically higher on the phonemic but not morphosyntactic measure, and this remained true in an ANCOVA analysis where total amount of hours of study input were controlled for. A robust ANCOVA testing for differences at different levels of input found interesting interactions between group affiliation and amount of input. Language attitudes were also tested. The evidence shows there can be perceivable age effects for linguistic measures even in a situation of minimal exposure to a foreign language, but these may not emerge until a substantial amount of input has been gained.
Bernstein, D., Roy, E., Srull, T. and Wickens, C.1988: Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
Bialystok, E. and Miller, B.1999: The problem of age in second-language acquisition: influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2, 127—45.
3.
Birdsong, D.2005: Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition . In Kroll, J. and de Groot, A.M.B., editors, Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, 109—27.
4.
Bley-Vroman, R.1988: The fundamental character of foreign language learning . In Rutherford, W. and Sharwood-Smith, M., editors, Grammar and second language teaching: a book of readings. New York: Newbury House, 19—30.
5.
Brown, J.D.1995: English language entrance examinations in Japan: problems and solutions. Unpublished paper presented at the Proceedings of the JALT 1995 Conference.
6.
Buckby, M.1976: Is primary French really in the balance?Modern Language Journal60, 340—46.
7.
Burstall, C.1977: Primary French in the balance. Foreign Language Annals10, 245—54.
8.
Burstall, C., Jamieson, M., Cohen, S. and Hargreaves, M.1974: Primary French in the balance. Windsor : NFER Publishing.
9.
Butler, Y.G.2005: Comparative perspectives towards communicative activities among elementary school teachers in South Korea, Japan and Taiwan. Language Teaching Research9, 423—46.
10.
Carroll, J.B. and Sapon, S.1959: Modern language aptitude test: form A. New York: The Psychological Corporation .
11.
Cenoz, J.2003: The influence of age on the acquisition of English: general proficiency, attitudes and code-mixing. In Garcia Mayo, M. and Garcia Lecumberri, M., editors, Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 77—93.
12.
Chaudron, C.2003: Data collection in SLA research. In Doughty, C. and Long, M.H., editors, The handbook of second language acquisition . Malden, MA: Blackwell, 762—828.
13.
Cohen, J.1988: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
DeKeyser, R.M.2000: The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition22, 499—533.
15.
—— 2003: Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. and Long, M.H., editors, The handbook of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 313—48.
16.
DeKeyser, R.M. and Larson-Hall, J.2005: What does the Critical Period really mean? In Kroll, J. and de Groot, A.M.B., editors, Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, 88—108.
17.
Dörnyei, Z. and Skehan, P.2003: Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. and Long, M.H., editors, The handbook of second language acquisition . Malden, MA: Blackwell, 589—630.
18.
Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G. and Liu, S.1999: Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory andLanguage41, 78—104.
19.
García Lecumberri, M. and Gallardo, F.2003: English FL sounds in school learners of different ages . In García Mayo, M. and García Lecumberri, M., editors, Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters, 115—35.
20.
García Mayo, M.2003: Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgements in the acquisition of English as a foreign language. In García Mayo, M. and García Lecumberri, M., editors, Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 94—114.
21.
García Mayo, M. and García Lecumberri, M., editors, 2003: Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.
22.
Gardner, R.C.1985: Social psychology and second language learning: the role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
23.
Gass, S.1994: The reliability of second-language grammaticality judgments . In Tarone, E., Gass, S. and Cohen, A., editors, Research methods in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 303—22.
24.
Hughes, H.J.1999: Cultivating the walled garden: English in Japan. English Studies6, 556—68.
25.
Hyltenstam, K. and Abrahamsson, N.2003: Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. and Long, M.H., editors, The handbook of second language acquisition . Malden, MA: Blackwell, 539—88.
26.
Jia, G.X., Aaronson, D. and Wu, Y.2002: Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: predictive variables and language group differences. Applied Psycholinguistics23, 599—621.
27.
Johnson, J.S. and Newport, E.L.1989: Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology21, 60—99.
28.
Koike, I. and Tanaka, H.1995: English in foreign language education policy in Japan: toward the twenty-first century. World Englishes14, 13—25.
29.
Lasagabaster, D. and Doiz, A.2003: Maturational constraints on foreign-language written production . In Garcia Mayo, M. and Garcia Lecumberri, M., editors, Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters, 136—60.
30.
Lederberg, A.R. and Spencer, P.E.2005: Critical periods in the acquisition of lexical skills: evidence from deaf individuals. In Fletcher, P. and Miller, J.F., editors, Developmental theory and language disorders. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 121—45.
31.
Lee, W.R.1977: For and against an early start. Foreign Language Annals10, 263—70.
32.
Leow, R.P.1996: Grammaticality judgment tasks and second-language development. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages andLinguistics , 126—39.
33.
Lightbown, P.M.2000: Classroom second language acquisition research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics21, 431—82.
34.
Mandell, P.B.1999: On the reliability of grammatical judgement tests in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research15, 73—99.
35.
Maronna, R.A., Martin, R.D. and Yohai, V.J.2006: Robust statistics: theory and methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
36.
Maxwell, S.E. and Delaney, H.D.2004: Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective. 2nd edition. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
37.
Mayberry, R.I. and Eichen, E.B.1991: The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory andLanguage30, 486—512.
38.
Morrow, P.R.1987: The users and uses of English in Japan. World Englishes6, 49—62.
39.
Moyer, A.2004: Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters .
40.
Muñoz, C.2001: Factores escolares e individuales en el aprendizaje formal de un idioma extranjero [Scholarly and individual factors in the formal comprehension of a foreign language]. Estudios de Linguistica, supplement1, 249—70.
41.
—— 2003: Variation in oral skills development and age of onset . In García Mayo, M. and García Lecumberri, M., editors, Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters, 161—81.
42.
Muñoz, C. and Tragant, E.2001: Motivation and attitudes towards L2: some effects of age and instruction. EuroslaYearbook1, 211—24.
43.
Oller, J. and Nagato, N.1974: The long-term effect of FLES: an experiment. Modern Language Journal58, 15—19.
44.
Oyama, S.1976: A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research5, 261—83.
45.
Patkowski, M.S.1994: The critical period hypothesis and interlanguage phonology . In Yavas, M., editor, First and second language phonology. San Diego, CA: Singular, 205—21.
46.
Riney, T.J. and Flege, J.E.1998: Changes over time in global foreign accent and liquid identifiability and accuracy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition20, 213—43.
47.
Sasaki, M.1996: Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence: quantitative and qualitative analyses. New York: Peter Lang.
48.
Sorace, A.1996: The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In Ritchie and W.C., Bhatia, T.K., editors, Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 375—409.
49.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.1971: Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin76, 105—10.
50.
Verba, S.Verba, S., Kelman, S., Orren, G.R., Miyaki, I., Watanuki, J., Kabashima, I. and Ferree, G.D.1987: Elites and the idea of equality: a comparison of Japan, Sweden, and the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Victori, M. and Tragant, E.2003: Learner strategies: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study of primary and high-school EFL teachers. In García Mayo, M. and García Lecumberri, M., editors, Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 182—209.
52.
Wilcox, R.2001: Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: substantially improving power and accuracy. New York: Springer.
53.
Yamada, R.A., Tohkura, Y. and Kobayashi, N.1996: Effect of word familiarity on non-native phoneme perception: identification of English /r/, /l/, and /w/ by native speakers of Japanese . In James, A. and Leather, J., editors, Second language speech . New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 103—18.
