This study presents findings from a quantitative content analysis of 975 German momfluencer Instagram accounts, exploring how motherhood is portrayed in the context of the platform economy. Grounded in a social constructivist perspective the analysis investigates how increasing self-professionalization—measured by follower count—affects self-presentation and thematic focus. Social media platforms reward visibility and engagement, prompting influencers to align with prevailing platform logics. The results show that with greater reach, momfluencers increasingly adopt more conforming and marketable representations of motherhood, suggesting a shift toward stereotypical portrayals. The study highlights how platform dynamics shape digital self-representation and reinforce exclusion in maternal representations. By examining how influencer practices both reflect and reproduce traditional gender roles, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of gendered labor in digital environments and its economic dimensions.
AbidinC (2017) #familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media + Society3(2): 1–15.
2.
AbidinCOtsM (2016) Influencers tell all? Unravelling authenticity and credibility in a brand scandal. In: BurnsBHighfieldEBurgessJ (eds) Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. Lausanne: Peter Lang, pp.153–170.
3.
AmarasekaraIGrantWJ (2018) Exploring the YouTube science communication gender gap: A sentiment analysis. Public Understanding of Science28(1): 68–84.
4.
AnnisaFGrealyK (2025) Indonesian mum-influencers: Motherhood, creative work and the challenges of a precarious workforce. Media International Australia, 0(0). Epub ahead of print 28. März 2025. DOI:10.1177/1329878×251328586.
5.
ArriagadaABishopS (2021) Between commerciality and authenticity: The imaginary of social media influencers in the platform economy. Communication Culture and Critique14(4): 568–586.
6.
Banet-WeiserS (2012) AuthenticTM the politics of ambivalence in a brand culture. Journal of Consumer Culture14(1): 129–131.
7.
BergerPLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
8.
BishopS (2018) Anxiety, panic and self-optimization. Convergence the International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies24(1): 69–84.
9.
CuevasLMLeeSHRecaldeD (2024) Fashion influencer moms on Instagram: Exploration of their affective labor and self-presentation practices. Social Media + Society10(4): 1–13.
10.
CunninghamSCraigD (2021) Social Media Entertainment: The New Intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. New York: NYU Press.
11.
DouglasSJMichaelsM (2004) The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How It Has Undermined Women. New York: Free Press.
12.
DuffyBE (2019) (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven: Yale University Press.
13.
DuffyBEHundE (2015) “Having it all” on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–11.
14.
DuffyBEHundE (2019) Gendered visibility on social media: Navigating Instagram’s authenticity bind. International Journal of Communication13: 4983–5002.
15.
DuffyBEPruchniewskaU (2017) Gender and self-enterprise in the social media age: A digital double bind. Information Communication & Society20(6): 843–859.
16.
EntwistleJWissingerE (2021) Dress like a mum/mom: Instagram style mums and the fashionable ideal. Fashion Theory27(1): 5–42.
FranckG (1998) Ökonomie Der Aufmerksamkeit: Ein Entwurf. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
19.
GermicEREckertSVulteeF (2021) The impact of Instagram mommy blogger content on the perceived self-efficacy of mothers. Social Media + Society7(3): 1–19.
20.
GoldhaberMH (1997) The attention economy and the net. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 7. April 1997. DOI:10.5210/fm.v2i4.519.
21.
GwetKL (2006) Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. British Journal of Mathematical And Statistical Psychology61(1): 29–48.
22.
HaysS (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
23.
HochschildAR (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
HouM (2018) Social media celebrity and the institutionalization of YouTube. Convergence the International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies25(3): 534–553.
25.
HunterA (2016) Monetizing the mommy: Mommy blogs and the audience commodity. Information Communication & Society19(9): 1306–1320.
26.
KlingerUSvenssonJ (2014) The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society17(8): 1241–1257.
27.
KnaufHSchrammeA (2023) #Mamanblogeuse and #mamablogger_de. A cross-country comparison on the concept of mothers and motherhood on Instagram. Popular Communication21(3–4): 232–246.
28.
LacySWatsonBRRiffeD, et al. (2015) Issues and best practices in content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly92(4): 791–811.
29.
LeaverTHighfieldTAbidinC (2020) Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
LückeJ (2024) Für Sorge: Wie Equal Care Euer Familienleben Rettet. München: Knaur.
31.
LünenborgMKonradLFritscheK, et al. (2012) Geschlecht und Ethnizität in audiovisuellen Medien. Methodologische und methodische Herausforderungen intersektionaler Medieninhaltsanalyse. In: MaierTThieleMLinkeC (eds) Medien, Öffentlichkeit Und Geschlecht in Bewegung. Forschungsperspektiven Der Kommunikations- Und Medienwissenschaftlichen Geschlechterforschung. Bielefeld: transcript, pp.99–114.
32.
MarwickAE (2013) Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. Yale University Press.
33.
MarwickAE (2015) Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture27(1): 137–160.
34.
MarySMDuschinskyRDavisL, et al. (2024) Representations of motherhood in the media: A systematic literature review. Information Communication & Society28(1): 169–186.
35.
MolyneauxHO’DonnellSGibsonK, et al. (2008) Exploring the gender divide on YouTube: An analysis of the creation and reception of vlogs. American Communication Journal10(2): 1–14.
36.
MüllerT (2024) Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Medienstudie 2024. Zahl der Social-Media-Nutzenden steigt auf 60 Prozent. Media Perspektiven28(2024): 1–7.
37.
OrgadSGillR (2022) Confidence Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.
38.
Orton-JohnsonK (2017) Mummy blogs and representations of motherhood: “Bad mummies” and their readers. Social Media + Society3(2): 205630511770718.
39.
RendtorffBLangerA (2018) Einleitung. In: MahsCRendtorffB (eds) Weiblichkeit - Ansätze Zur Theoretisierung. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich, pp.7–13.
40.
SchierMJurczykK (2008) Familie als Herstellungsleistung“ in Zeiten der Entgrenzung. Sozialwissenschaftlicher Fachinformationsdienst soFid: Familienforschung 2008/1, 9–18. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-201763
41.
SzostakN (2013) Girls on YouTube: Gender politics and the potential for a public sphere. The McMaster Journal of Communication8. Available at: https://journals.mcmaster.ca/mjc/article/view/280
42.
TiidenbergKBaymNK (2017) Learn it, buy it, work it: Intensive pregnancy on Instagram. Social Media + Society3(1): 1–13.
43.
Van DrielLDumitricaD (2020) Selling brands while staying “authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence the International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies27(1): 66–84.
44.
WegenerCJage-D’AprileFPlumeierL (2022) Motherhood in social media: Phenomena and consequences of the professionalization of mothers and their media (self-)representation. Feminist Media Studies23(7): 3222–3238.
45.
WegenerCPrommerELinkeC (2020). Gender representations on YouTube: The exclusion of female diversity. M/C Journal23(6). Epub ahead of print 8 November 2020. 10.1177/09544327167940.
46.
WotanisLMcMillanL (2014) Performing gender on YouTube. Feminist Media Studies14(6): 912–928.
47.
ZhaoWBouvierG (2021) Where neoliberalism shapes Confucian notions of child rearing: Influencers, experts and discourses of intensive parenting on Chinese Weibo. Discourse Context & Media45: 100561.
