This article examines how the two most popular Czech quality dailies framed refugees and migrants during the European refugee crisis in 2015. It explores the extent to which the framing described by previous studies carried out in Western and/or destination countries can also be identified in the newspapers of a country that has had only minimal experience with migration. Instead of identifying frames beforehand and coding them as holistic variables, a routinely used approach to frame analysis, it employs a more reliable and transparent method of hierarchical cluster analysis. The dailies framed the refugees and migrants mainly as a burden on host society, as victims of a humanitarian crisis and, to a lesser degree, as a security threat. The results show that the frames used by the Czech dailies closely correspond to those described in previous research, despite the different methods of analysis and the different geographical and cultural settings.
BalabanovaEBalchA (2010)
Sending and receiving: The ethical framing of intra-EU migration in the European press’. European Journal of Communication25(4): 382–397.
3.
BalchABalabanovaE (2016)
Ethics, politics and migration: Public debates on the free movement of Romanians and Bulgarians in the UK, 2006–2013’. Politics36(1): 19–35.
4.
BaumanZ (2016) Strangers at Our Door.
Malden, MA:
Polity Press.
5.
BensonRWoodT (2015)
Who says what or nothing at all? Speakers, frames, and frameless quotes in unauthorized immigration news in the United States, Norway, and France. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 802–821.
6.
BerryMGarcia-BlancoIMooreK (2016) Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries.
Geneva:
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
7.
BlinderSAllenW (2016)
Constructing immigrants: Portrayals of migrant groups in British national newspapers. International Migration Review50(1): 3–40.
8.
BrantonRPDunawayJ (2009)
Spatial proximity to the U.S.-Mexico border and newspaper coverage of immigration issues. Political Research Quarterly62(2): 289–302.
9.
BreenMHaynesADevereuxE (2006)
Fear, framing and foreigners: The othering of immigrants in the Irish print media. International Journal of Critical Psychology16: 100–121.
10.
BrouwerJVan der WoudeMVan der LeunJ (2017)
Framing migration and the process of crimmigration: A systematic analysis of the media representation of unauthorized immigrants in the Netherlands. European Journal of Criminology14(1): 100–119.
11.
BurroughsE (2015)
Discursive representations of ‘illegal immigration’ in the Irish newsprint media: The domination and multiple facets of the ‘control’ argumentation. Discourse & Society26(2): 165–183.
12.
ChouliarakiLStolicT (2017)
Rethinking media responsibility in the refugee ‘crisis’: A visual typology of European news. Media, Culture and Society39(8): 1162–1177.
13.
ChouliarakiLZaborowskiR (2017)
Voice and community in the 2015 refugee crisis: A content analysis of news coverage in eight European countries. International Communication Gazette79(6–7): 613–635.
14.
CorbuNButuroiuRDurachF (2017)
Framing the refugee crisis in online media: A Romanian perspective. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations19(2): 5–18.
DonZMLeeC (2014)
Representing immigrants as illegals, threats and victims in Malaysia: Elite voices in the media. Discourse & Society25(6): 687–705.
17.
EberlJ-MMeltzerCEHeidenreichTet al. (2018)
The European media discourse on immigration and its effects: A literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association42(3): 207–223.
18.
Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.
FigenschouTUThorbjornsrudK (2015)
Faces of an invisible population: Human interest framing of irregular immigration news in the United States, France, and Norway’. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 783–801.
23.
FreelonD (2010)
ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science5(1): 20–33.
24.
FreelonD (2013)
ReCal OIR: Ordinal, interval, and ratio intercoder reliability as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science8(1): 10–16.
25.
GrannerMLSharpePABurroughsELet al. (2010)
Newspaper content analysis in evaluation of a community-based participatory project to increase physical activity. Health Education Research25(4): 656–667.
26.
GreussingEBoomgaardenHG (2017)
Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe’s 2015 refugee crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43(11): 1749–1774.
27.
HertogJKMcLeodDM (2001)
A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In: ReeseSDGandyOHGrantAE (eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World.
Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 141–162.
28.
HorstiK (2007)
Asylum seekers in the news: Frames of illegality and control. Observatorio (OBS*)1(1): 145–161.
29.
JakubowiczKSükösdM (eds) (2008) Finding the Right Place on the Map: Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global Perspective.
Bristol:
Intellect Books.
30.
KayaA (2012)
Backlash of multiculturalist and republicanist policies of integration in the age of securitization. Philosophy and Social Criticism38(4–5): 399–411.
31.
KhosravinikM (2009)
The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society20(4): 477–498.
32.
KimSCarvalhoJPDavisAGet al. (2011)
The view of the border: News framing of the definition, causes, and solutions to illegal immigration. Mass Communication and Society14(3): 292–314.
33.
KiousisS (2004)
Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication54: 71–87.
34.
KovářJ (2019)
A security threat or an economic consequence? An analysis of the news framing of the European Union’s refugee crisis. International Communication Gazette. Epub ahead of print 28 February.
35.
KrippendorffK (2004)
Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research30(3): 411–433.
36.
LawlorATolleyE (2017)
Deciding who’s legitimate: News media framing of immigrants and refugees. International Journal of Communication11: 967–991.
37.
LawrenceRG (2010)
Researching political news framing: Established ground and new horizons. In: KuypersJAD’AngeloP (eds) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives.
London:
Routledge, pp. 265–85.
38.
McCombsM (2005)
A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies6(4): 543–557.
39.
McKayFHThomasSLBloodRW (2011)
‘Any one of these boat people could be a terrorist for all we know!’ Media representations and public perceptions of ‘boat people’ arrivals in Australia. Journalism12(5): 607–626.
40.
MatthesJKohringM (2008)
The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication58(2): 258–279.
41.
MeeusenCJacobsL (2017)
Television news content of minority groups as an intergroup context indicator of differences between target-specific prejudices. Mass Communication and Society20(2): 213–240.
PollockJCPeitzKWatsonEet al. (2017)
Comparing cross-national coverage of genetically modified organisms: A community structure approach. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(2): 571–596.
44.
PughMC (2004)
Drowning not waving: Boat people and humanitarianism at sea. Journal of Refugee Studies17(1): 50–69.
45.
RasingerSM (2010)
‘Lithuanian migrants send crime rocketing’: Representation of ‘new’ migrants in regional print media. Media, Culture and Society32(6): 1021–1030.
46.
StrapáčováMHloušekV (2018)
Anti-Islamism without Moslems: Cognitive frames of Czech antimigrant politics. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics12(1): 1–30.
47.
ThorbjornsrudK (2015)
Framing irregular immigration in Western media. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 771–782.
48.
ThreadgoldT (2009) The Media and Migration in the United Kingdom, 1999 to 2009.
Washington, DC:
Migration Policy Institute.
49.
TkaczykM (2017)
Between politicization and securitization: Coverage of the European migration crisis in Czech online news media. Communication Today8(2): 90–111.
50.
TriandafyllidouA (2018)
A ‘refugee crisis’ unfolding: ‘Real’ events and their interpretation in media and political debates. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16(1–2): 198–216.
51.
UrbánikováMVolekJ (2018)
The professional identity of Czech journalists in an international perspective. International Communication Gazette80(5): 452–475.
52.
Van GorpB (2005)
Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication20(4): 484–507.
53.
VliegenthartRRoggebandC (2007)
Framing immigration and integration: Relationships between press and parliament in the Netherlands. International Communication Gazette69(3): 295–319.
