This article studies the impact of right and left moderate political orientation of newspapers on the levels of plurality in the news coverage of the Euro Crisis in 20 newspapers from 10 European countries through a methodology based on Simpson’s D index. The expectation of finding distinct patterns of coverage leading to high levels of plurality was not fully supported and the results have shown that national frames influence levels of overall plurality more than political ideology.
AgrestiAAgrestiB (1978) Statistical analysis of qualitative variation. Sociological Methodology9: 204–237.
2.
BachTWeberMQuiringO (2013) News frames, inter-media frame transfer and the financial crisis. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze1(213): 90–110.
3.
BlumlerJGurevitchM (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. London; New York: Routledge.
4.
DellaVignaSKaplanE (2007) The fox news effect: Media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics122(3): 1187–1234.
5.
De TocquevilleA (2001 [1835]) Da Democracia na América [On Democracy in America]. Cascais: Principia.
6.
De VreeseC (2002) Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.
7.
De VreeseCBoomgaardenH (2012) Comparing news on Europe: Elections and beyond. In: EsserFHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 327–340.
8.
EildersC (2002) Conflict and consonance in media opinion: Political positions of five German quality newspapers. European Journal of Communication17(1): 25–63.
9.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
IyengarS (1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues?Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
KarppinenK (2013) Rethinking Media Pluralism. New York: Fordham University Press.
12.
KirchheimerO (1966) The transformation of the western European party systems. In: LaPalombaraJWeinerM (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 177–200.
13.
LarcineseVPuglisiRSnyderM. (2007) Partisan bias in economic news: Evidence on the agenda-setting behavior of U.S. newspapers. PSPE working papers, Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, July. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/25185/1/PSPE_WP7_07_(LSERO).pdf (accessed February 2015).
14.
LichtenbergJ (ed.) (1990) Democracy and the Mass Media. Cambridge; New York; Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
15.
LiebersonS (1969) Measuring population diversity. American Sociological Review34(6): 850–862.
16.
McDonaldDDimmickJ (2003) The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research30: 60–79.
17.
McQuailD (2000) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: SAGE.
18.
Noelle-NeumannEMathesR (1987) The ‘event as event’ and the ‘event as news’: The significance of ‘consonance’ for media effects research. European Journal of Communication2: 391–414.
19.
PicardR (ed.) (2015) The Euro Crisis in the Media: Journalistic Coverage of Economic Crisis and European Institutions. London; New York: I.B. Tauris.
20.
RamonetI (2002) A tirania da comunicação [The Tyranny of Communication]. Porto: Campo das Letras.
21.
SalgadoS (2010) Os Candidatos Presidenciais: Construção de Imagens e Discursos nos Media [Presidential Candidates: Construction of Images and Discourses in the Media]. Coimbra: Minerva Coimbra.
22.
SalgadoSNienstedtH-WSchneiderL (2015) Consensus or discussion? An analysis of plurality and consonance in coverage. In: PicardRG (ed.) The Euro Crisis in the Media: Journalistic Coverage of Economic Crisis and European Institutions. London; New York: I.B. Tauris, pp. 103–124.
23.
SimpsonEH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature163(4): 313–327.
24.
StroudNJ (2008) Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior30(3): 341–366.
25.
StroudNJ (2010) Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication60(3): 556–576.
