Digital divide and beyond: What do we know of Information and Communications Technology’s long-term social effects? Some uncomfortable questions

Abstract

Our daily lives have become so immersed in digital Information and Communications Technology that we rarely stop to think about it. We know much about the benefits brought by its recent developments, including the Internet with its numerous applications. At the same time, there is increasing concern that the economic emphasis linked to these technologies will widen the digital divide, potentially sharpening social inequalities in a global scale. However, it has come ever more clear that it is not technology as such that is the cause of the social problems with digital communications technology but the ways how it has been applied, reflecting unequal power relations in our societies. There are a number of disturbing questions concerning the long-term effects of the social and cultural deployment of Information and Communications Technology. Some of the questions we address in this article here are the following: Can digital Information and Communications Technology still be regulated nationally? How do we measure the effects of Information and Communications Technology on academic work? How should we think critically about big data? Has digital Information and Communications Technology improved our lives?

Keywords

Big data digital divide Information and Communications Technology policy media and communication regulation media and democracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

(2011) The children must play. Available at: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/82329/education-reform-Finland-US

Academy of Finland (2014) Funding instrument for strategic research. Available at: http://www.aka.fi/Tiedostot/STN/STN_yleisesittely_en.pdf

Academy of Finland (2015) Strategic research funding. Available at: http://www.aka.fi/en/research-and-science-policy/strategic-research-funding/

Agrawal

Bernstein

Bertino

. (2012) Challenges and opportunities with big data: A community white paper developed by leading researchers across the United States. Available at: http://www.cra.org/ccc/files/docs/init/bigdatawhitepaper.pdf

Bailey

Freedman

(eds) (2011) The Assault on Universities: A Manifesto for Resistance. London: Pluto Press.

Bangemann

da Fonseca

Davis

. (1994) Recommendations to the European Council: Europe and the Global Information Society. Members of the High-Level Group on the Information Society. Available at: http://www.channelingreality.com/Digital_Treason/Brussels_1995/Bangemann_report.pdf

Bertino

(2013) Big data – Opportunities and challenges. In: Panel position paper: IEEE 37th annual computer software and applications conference. Available at: https://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/bertino/compsac13.pdf

boyd

(2010) Privacy and publicity in the context of big data, 29 April. Available at: http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/2010/WWW2010.html

boyd

Crawford

(2012) Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 662–679.

10.

Burawoy

(2011) Redefining the Public University: Developing an analytical framework. Available at: http://publicsphere.ssrc.org/burawoy-redefining-the-public-university/

11.

Carrigan

Kitchin

(2014) Big data should complement small data, not replace them. In: The Philosophy of Data Science (series: LSE Impact of Social Sciences). Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/06/27/series-philosophy-of-data-science-rob-kitchin/

12.

Castells

Himanen

(2004) The Information Society and the Welfare State: The Finnish Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Collini

(2012) What are Universities For? London: Penguin Books.

14.

Collins

(1994) Broadcasting and Audio-Visual Policy in the European Single Market. London: John Libbey.

15.

Collins

(2013) The end of middle-class work: No more escapes. In Wallerstein

Collins

Mann

. (2014) Does Capitalism Have a Future? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–69.

16.

Compañó

Pascu

Bianchi

. (2006) The Future of the Information Society in Europe: Contributions to the Debate. Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/eur22353en.pdf

17.

Crouch

(2013) Making Capitalism Fit for Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

18.

European Commission (2011) Horizon 2020 – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Brussels: Communication from the Commission of the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0808&;from=EN

19.

European Commission (2014) Towards a Thriving Data-Driven Economy. Brussels: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (2 November, COM, 442 final). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/communication-data-driven-economy

20.

European University Association (2015) What is the Bologna Process? Available at: http://www.eua.be/eua-work-and-policy-area/building-the-european-higher-education-area/bologna-basics.aspx

21.

Feather

(2008) The Information Society: A Study of Continuity and Change. London: Facet Publishing.

22.

Freedman

(2012) The Contradictions of Media Power. London: Bloomsbury.

23.

Friedman

(2013) The crisis of the middle class and American power. Geopolitical Weekly, 31 December. Available at: http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/crisis-middle-class-and-american-power#axzz3PNWDsxS6

24.

Gamble

(2014) Crisis Without End? The Unravelling of Western Prosperity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

25.

Gibbs

(2014) European Parliament votes yes on ‘Google Breakup’ motion. The Guardian, 27 November. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/nov/27/european-parliament-votes-yes-google-breakup-motion

26.

Gillespie

(2014) The relevance of algorithms. In: Gillespie

Boczkowski

Foot

(eds) Media Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 167–195.

27.

Golding

(1996) World wide wedge: Division and contradiction in the global information infrastructure. Monthly Review 48(3): 70–85.

28.

Goodwin

Spittle

(2002) The European Union and the information society: Discourse, power and policy. New Media & Society 4(2): 225–249.

29.

Grimmer

(2014) ‘We’re all social scientists now: How big data, machine learning, and causal inference work together’. Available at: http://stanford.edu/~jgrimmer/bd_2.pdf

30.

Hallin

Mancini

(2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Harris

(2011) The decline and fall of the American middle class. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/sep/13/american-middle-class-poverty

32.

Humphreys

(1996) Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

33.

Internet Governance Forum (IGF) (2015) Internet Governance Forum. Available at: http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/

34.

Järvensivu

Kokkinen

Kasvio

. (2014) Changes at work – A challenge and an opportunity for well-being at work, careers and the quality of work life. Report for the International Evaluation of the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. Available at: http://www.ttl.fi/en/publications/Electronic_publications/Documents/Changes_at_Work.pdf

35.

Joutsenvirta

(2009) Yliopistolaisten Teknologisesti Välittynyt Arki. Lisensiaattityö, Sosiaalipsykologian Laitos, Helsingin Yliopisto [Technologically Mediated Everyday Life of University Workers]. Licenciate thesis, Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/101038/16290

36.

Juntunen

Saarinen

(2014) Keskiluokan työpaikat katoavat biteiksi [Middle Class Work Places Evaporate Into Bits.] Helsingin Sanomat, 27 January. Available at: http://www.hs.fi/talous/a1390767423539

37.

Kelly

(2005) As America Becomes More Diverse: The Impact of State Higher Education Inequality. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. Available at: http://www.higheredinfo.org/raceethnicity/InequalityPaperNov2005.pdf

38.

Kitchin

(2014) Thinking critically about and researching algorithms: The programmable city working paper 5. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2515786

39.

Kivinen

Hedman

Kaipainenet

(2012) Koulutusmahdollisuuksien yhdenvertaisuus Suomessa. Eriarvoisuuden uudet ja vanhat muodot [Equality in educational opportunities in Finland: New and old forms of inequality]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka [Society and Politics] 77(5): 559–566.

40.

Kline

(2014) The ends of History and the tyranny of the algorithm. In: History of games international conference proceedings, Kinephanos, January. Available at: http://www.kinephanos.ca/

41.

Kotkin

(2014) The U.S. middle class is turning proletarian. Forbes, 16 February. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2014/02/16/the-u-s-middle-class-is-turning-proletarian/

42.

Krugman

(2012) Robots and Robber Barons. The New York Times, 9 December. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/opinion/krugman-robots-and-robber-barons.html?_r=0

43.

Lawn

Grek

(2012) Europeanizing Education: Governing a New Policy Space. Oxford: Symposium Books.

44.

Levy

(2001) Europe’s Digital Revolution: Broadcasting Regulation, the EU and the Nation State. London: Routledge.

45.

Mager

(2011) Algorithm ideology: How capitalist society shapes search engines. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 769–787.

46.

Mansell

(2012) Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

47.

May

(2002) The Information Society: A Sceptical View. Cambridge: Polity Press.

48.

Ministry of Transport and Communications (MinTC) (2014) Big datan hyödyntäminen. Liikenne-ja viestintäministeriön julkaisuja 20/2014 [Big Data Exploitation 20/204]. Helsinki: MTC Publications (Liikenne-ja viestintäministeriö). Available at: http://www.lvm.fi/julkaisu/4417803/big-datan-hyodyntaminen

49.

Müller

Rosenbach

Schulz

(2013) Living by the numbers: Big data knows what your future holds. Spiegel Online, 17 May. Available at: http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/big-data-enables-companies-and-researchers-to-look-into-the-future-a-899964.html

50.

Napoli

(2014) Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory 24: 340–360.

51.

Noam

(2014) Why the Internet economy raises inequality: The macro-economics of micro-electronics. In: Vartanova

(ed.) Creative Industries in the Reindustrializing World: Media Practices of the West and the East. Moscow: Moscow University Press, pp. 20–26 (Also published in Abstracts 6th International Media Readings in Moscow 2014, October 17–18).

52.

Norris

(2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Olssen

Peters

(2005) Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy 20(3): 313–334.

54.

Osborne

(2013) German state fights Facebook over alleged privacy violations. The Guardian, 4 January. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/04/facebook-germany-data-protection

55.

Policy Alert (2005) Income of U.S. workforce projected to decline if education doesn’t improve. Available at: http://www.highereducation.org/reports/pa_decline/pa_decline.pdf

56.

Pulkkinen

Roihuvuo

(2014) Erkanevat koulutuspolut – Koulutuksen tasa-arvon tila 2010-luvulla [Differentiating Educational Paths: The State of Educational Equality in the 2010s]. Helsinki: Suomen ylioppilaskuntien liitto [The Finnish National Union of Students].

57.

Ritzer

(2015) McDonaldization of Society, 8th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

58.

Rushe

(2013) French watchdog barks at Google over missed deadline on privacy policy. The Guardian, 27 September. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/sep/27/google-privacy-policy-france-watchdog-cnil

59.

Sparks

(2013) The digital divide today and tomorrow. Javnost/The Public 20(2): 27–46.

60.

Strauss

(2012) What the U.S. can’t learn from Finland about ed reform. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/what-the-us-cant-learn-from-finland-about-ed-reform/2012/04/16/gIQAGIvVMT_blog.html

61.

Touraine

(2014) After the Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

62.

Trappel

Steemers

Thomass

(eds) (2015) European Media in Crisis: Values, Risks and Policies. London: Routledge.

63.

Tung

(2012) How the Finnish school system outshines U.S. Education. Available at: http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/january/finnish-schools-reform-012012.html

64.

Van Dijk Jan

AGM

(2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi: SAGE.

65.

Wallerstein

(2013) Structural crisis, or why capitalists may no longer find capitalism rewarding. In: In: Wallerstein

Collins

Mann

. Does Capitalism Have a Future? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–35.

66.

Webster

(2014) Theories of the Information Society, 4th edn. London: Routledge.

67.

Wikipedia (2015) Big data. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_data