Taking forward a new agenda for online political deliberation – the study of everyday political talk in non-political, online ‘third spaces’ – this article examines the dynamics of political talk across three general interest UK-based online forums. The quantitative analysis found that discussions about austerity were just as likely to emerge from non-political discussions as they were ones that began as ‘political’, demonstrating the links people made between everyday experiences and public policy. Our qualitative analysis represents the first real attempt to analyse political actions within third spaces, with some striking outcomes. Over half of all political discussions led to at least one political action (with significant variation between forums). The findings demonstrate that while such third spaces remain concerned with the preoccupations of everyday life, they can and do perform a role of mobilizing agent towards political participation.
BergerCR (2009) Interpersonal communication. In: StacksDWSalwenMB (eds) An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 260–279.
3.
ChadwickA (2012) Recent shifts in the relationship between the Internet and democratic engagement in Britain and the United States: Granularity, informational exuberance, and political learning. In: AnduizaEJensenMJorbaL (eds) Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–55.
4.
ColemanSBlumlerJG (2009) The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ColemanSMossG (2012) Under construction: The field of online deliberation research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics9(1): 1–15.
6.
DahlbergL (2001) Extending the public sphere through cyberspace: The case of Minnesota e-democracy. First Monday6(3): Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210%2Ffm.v6i3.838.
7.
DahlgrenP (2003) Reconfiguring civic culture in the new media Milieu. In: CornerJPelsD (eds) Media and the Restyling of Politics. London: SAGE, pp. 151–170.
8.
Gil de ZunigaHValenzuelaS (2011) The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties and civic engagement. Communication Research38(3): 397–421.
9.
GrahamT (2008) Needles in a haystack: A new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in nonpolitical discussion forums. Javnost – The Public15(2): 5–24.
10.
GrahamT (2010) Talking politics online within spaces of popular culture: The case of the big brother forum. Javnost – The Public17(4): 25–42.
11.
GrahamT (2011) What’s reality television got to do with it? Talking politics in the net-based public sphere. In: BrantsKVoltmerK (eds) Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 248–264.
12.
GrahamT (2012) Beyond ‘Political’ communicative spaces: Talking politics on the wife swap discussion forum. Journal of Information Technology & Politics9(1): 31–45.
13.
GrahamTHarjuA (2011) Reality TV as a trigger of everyday political talk in the net-based public sphere. European Journal of Communication26(1): 18–32.
14.
GrahamTWrightS (2014) Discursive equality and everyday talk online: The impact of ‘Super-Participants’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(3): 625–642.
15.
HabermasJ (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
16.
HabermasJ (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
HalpernDGibbsJ (2013) Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior29(3): 1159–1168.
18.
HeldD (2006) Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
HuckfeldtRSpragueJ (1995) Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
JacksonD (2011) Strategic news frames and public policy debates: Press and television news coverage of the euro in the UK. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research36(2): 169–194.
21.
JacksonDScullionRMolesworthM (2013) ‘Ooh, politics. You’re brave’. Politics in everyday talk: An analysis of three ‘Non-Political’ online spaces. In: ScullionRGerodimosRJacksonD. (eds) The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment. London: Routledge, pp. 205–220.
22.
KoopRJansenHJ (2009) Political blogs and blogrolls in Canada: Forums for democratic deliberation?Social Science Computer Review27(2): 155–173.
OldenburgR (1989) The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlours, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You through the Day. New York: Paragon House.
26.
RuizCDomingoDLluís MicóJ. (2011) Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(4): 463–487.
27.
SchneiderSM (1996) Creating a democratic public sphere through political discussion. Social Science Computer Review14(4): 373–393.
28.
SchulerD (1996) New Community Networks. New York: ACM Press.
29.
SteinkuehlerCWilliamsD (2006) Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as ‘Third Places’. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication11(4): 885–909.
30.
Van ZoonenL (2005) Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
31.
Van ZoonenL (2007) Audience reactions to Hollywood politics. Media, Culture & Society29(4): 531–547.
32.
WrightS (2007) A virtual European public sphere? The Futurum discussion forum. Journal of European Public Policy14(8): 1167–1185.
33.
WrightS (2012a) From ‘Third Place’ to ‘Third Space’: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost – The Public19(3): 5–20.
34.
WrightS (2012b) Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media & Society14(2): 244–261.
