Comparative media analysis: Why some fuzzy thinking might help. Applying fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to the personalization of mediated political communication
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online December, 2010
Comparative media analysis: Why some fuzzy thinking might help. Applying fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to the personalization of mediated political communication
This article examines the benefits of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) for comparative media research. It shows the advantages of fuzzy set theoretic thinking in examining the causes of a major feature of contemporary political communication research, namely personalization. The article has three parts. The first is a critique of the method adopted by Hallin and Mancini, a generally laudable and highly influential recent contribution to comparative media analysis. The second is a brief introduction to fsQCA. The third demonstrates the method’s usefulness by investigating the personalized character of mediated political communication.
Alexander J. ( 1981) The mass news media in systemic, historical and comparative perspective. In: Katz E and Szecsko T (eds) Mass Media and Social Change . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Atkinson D and Raboy M (eds) (1997) Public Service Broadcasting and the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century. Paris: UNESCO.
3.
Blais A. and Massicotte L. ( 2002) Electoral systems. In: Le Duc L, Niemi RG and Norris N (eds) Comparing Democracies 2. London: Sage.
4.
Campus D. and Pasquino G. ( 2006) Leadership in Italy: The changing role of leaders in elections and in government. Journal of Contemporary European Studies14(1): 25-40.
5.
Canache D. ( 2002) From bullets to ballots: The emergence of popular support for Hugo Chavez. Latin American Politics and Society44(1): 69-90.
6.
Clarke DH, Sanders D., Stewart M. and Whiteley P. ( 2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
7.
Dalton RJ and Burklin W. ( 2003) Wahler als wandervogel: Dealignment and the German voter . German Politics and Society21(1): 57-74.
8.
Dalton RJ and Wattenberg MP (eds) (2000) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
9.
Dalton RJ, McAllister I. and Wattenberg MP ( 2000) The consequences of partisan dealignment. In: Dalton RJ and Wattenberg MP (eds) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Ebbinghaus B. ( 2005) When less is more: Selection problems in large-N and small-N cross national comparisons. International Sociology20(2): 133-152.
11.
Esser F and Pfetsch B (eds) (2004) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
George A. and Bennett A. ( 2005) Case Studies and Theory Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Habermas J. ( 2006) Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory16(4): 411-426.
14.
Hallin DC and Mancini P. ( 2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Johansson B. ( 2008) Popularized election coverage, news coverage of Swedish parliamentary election campaigns, 1979-2006. In: Stromback J, Orsten M and Aalberg T (eds) Communicating Politics: Political Communication in the Nordic Countries. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
16.
Johnson DW (ed.) (2008) Handbook of Political Management. London: Routledge.
17.
Lessinger E-M and Holtz-Bacha C. ( 2003) Party electoral advertising in Germany : from 1957 to 2002. Paper presented to the ECPR General Conference , 18-21 September.
18.
Livingstone S. ( 2003) On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication18(4): 477-500.
19.
McAllister I. ( 2007) The personalization of politics. In: Dalton RJ and Klingemann H-D (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Maniago ERD ( 2007) Communication variables favoring celebrity candidates in becoming politicians: A case study of the 1998 and 2004 elections in the Philippines. South East Asian Studies44(4): 494-518.
21.
Miller AH, Wattenberg MP and Malunchuk O. ( 1986) Schematic assessment of presidential candidates . American Political Science Review80: 521-540.
22.
Mughan A. ( 2000) Media and the Presidentialization of Parliamentary Elections . Basingstoke: Palgrave .
23.
Muir K. ( 2005) Media darlings and falling stars: Celebrity and the reporting of political leaders. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture2(2): 54-71.
24.
Musialowska EA( 2008) Political communication in Germany and Poland. Unpublished thesis, Technical University, Dresden. Available at: deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=989990699&dok_var=d1&dok_ext=pdf&filename=989990699.pdf.
25.
Negrine R, Mancini P, Holtz-Bacha C and Papathanassopoulos S (eds) (2007) The Professionalisation of Political Communication. Bristol: Intellect .
26.
Neveu E. ( 2005) Politicians without politics, a polity without citizens: The politics of the chat show in contemporary France. Modern and Contemporary France13(3): 323-335.
27.
Park M-J and Curran J (eds) (2000) De-Westernizing Media Studies . London: Routledge.
28.
Plasser F. and Lengauer G. ( 2008) Television campaigning worldwide. In: Johnson DW (ed.) Handbook of Political Management . London: Routledge.
29.
Plasser F. with Plasser G. ( 2002) Global Political Campaigning: A World-Wide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and their Practices. Westport, CT : Praeger.
30.
Quintos de Jesus M. ( 2007) The Philippines press, a study in contrasts and contradictions . In: Severino R, Salazar LC and Stiftung KA (eds) Whither the Philippines in the 21st Century?Manila: The Institute of South East Asian Studies.
31.
Ragin C. ( 1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Qualitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
Ragin C. ( 2000) Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Ragin C. ( 2008a) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Ragin C. ( 2008b) Measurement v calibration: A set theoretic approach . In: Box-Steffenmeier JM, Brady HE and Collier D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
Ragin C. ( 2008c) Masterclass: Qualitative comparative analysis . Economic and Social Research Council Festival of Methods . Available at: www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/festival/programme/qcr/ragin.pdf .
36.
Ragin C. ( 2008d) What is qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)?ESRC Festival of Methods. Available at: 74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:TLR2WjeJF4wJ:www.ncrm.ac.uk/RMF2008/festival/programme/wha3/pres5/What_is_QCA.pdf+fsQCA+remainders&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk.
37.
Rahat G. and Sheafer T. ( 2007) The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949-2003 . Political Communication24(1): 65-80.
38.
Reineman C. and Wilke J. ( 2007) It’s the debates stupid: How the introduction of televised debates changed the portrayal of Chancellor candidates in the German press, 1949-2005. Harvard Journal of Press/Politics12(4): 92-111.
39.
Scarrow SE, Webb P. and Farrell P. ( 2000) From social integration to electoral contestation: The changing distribution of power within political parties. In: Dalton RJ and Wattenberg MP (eds) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Schafferer C (ed.) (2006) Election Campaigning in East and Southeast Asia. Aldershot: Ashgate.
41.
Schmitt H. and Holmberg S. ( 1995) Political parties in decline? In: Klingemann H-D and Fuchs D (eds) Citizens and the State. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
42.
Schulz-Herzenberg C. ( 2007) A silent revolution: South African voters, 1994-2006 . In: Buhlungu S, Daniel J, Southall R and Lutchman J (eds) State of the Nation 2007 . Cape Town: HSRC Press.
43.
Siebert F., Peterson T. and Schramm W. ( 1956) Four Theories of the Press. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
44.
Sparks C and Tulloch J (eds) (2000) Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards . Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
45.
Stanyer J and Wring D (eds) (2004) Public images, private lives: The mediation of politicians around the globe. Special edition of Parliamentary Affairs57(1).
46.
Voltmer K (ed) (2006) Mass Media and Political Communication in New Democracies. London : Routledge.
47.
Weber M. ( 1949) Objective possibility and adequate causation in historical explanation. In: Shils E and Finch H (eds) The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, NY: Free Press .
48.
World Association of Newspapers. (2008) World Press Trends, 2008 edn. Paris.
