In recent decades, there has been considerable interest in the production of biodegradable biomaterials derived from magnesium (Mg). Although Mg is prone to corrosion, its favorable properties—such as less density and excellent biocompatibility—have driven substantial research in this area. To enhance both the resistance to corrosion and biocompatibility, electrophoretic deposition (EPD) has been studied as an effective surface modification technique. This review offers a comprehensive examination of EPD coatings applied to alloys of Mg, incorporating various bioactive reinforcements. Additionally, it addresses the challenges faced by Mg-based alloys and explores potential directions for future research.
SalunkePShanovVWitteF. High purity biodegradable magnesium coating for implant application. Mater Sci Eng B2011; 176: 1711–1717.
6.
SongG. Control of biodegradation of biocompatible magnesium alloys. Corros Sci2007; 49: 1696–1701.
7.
SongGSongS. A possible biodegradable magnesium implant material. Adv Eng Mater2007; 9: 298–302.
8.
AliMHusseinMAAl-AqeeliN. Magnesium-based composites and alloys for medical applications: a review of mechanical and corrosion properties. J Alloys Compd2019; 792: 1162–1190.
9.
LinDYWangXX. Preparation of hydroxyapatite coating on smooth implant surface by electrodeposition. Ceram Int2011; 37: 403–406.
10.
SongYWShanDYHanEH. Electrodeposition of hydroxyapatite coating on AZ91D magnesium alloy for biomaterial application. Mater Lett2008; 62: 3276–3279.
11.
KimHWKongYMBaeCJ, et al.Sol–gel derived fluor-hydroxyapatite biocoatings on zirconia substrate. Biomaterials2004; 25: 2919–2926.
12.
KeimSBrunnerJGFabryB,et al.Control of magnesium corrosion and biocompatibility with biomimetic coatings. J Biomed Mater Res B2011; 96: 84–90.
13.
DrevetRJaberNBFauréJ, et al.Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) of nano-hydroxyapatite coatings with improved mechanical properties on prosthetic Ti6Al4 V substrates. Surf Coat Technol2016; 301: 94–99.
14.
BlawertCDietzelWGhaliE,et al.Anodizing treatments for magnesium alloys and their effect on corrosion resistance in various environments. Adv Eng Mater2006; 8: 511–533.
15.
XinYLiuCZhangW, et al.Electrochemical behavior Al2O3/Al coated surgical AZ91 magnesium alloy in simulated body fluids. J Electrochem Soc2008; 155: C178.
16.
WhiteLKooYYunY,et al.Tio2 deposition on AZ31 magnesium alloy using plasma electrolytic oxidation. J Nanomater2013; 2013: 319437.
HeiseSHöhlingerMHernándezYT, et al.Electrophoretic deposition and characterization of chitosan/bioactive glass composite coatings on Mg alloy substrates. Electrochim Acta2017; 232: 456–464.
19.
HeiseSWirthTHöhlingerM, et al.Electrophoretic deposition of chitosan/bioactive glass/silica coatings on stainless steel and WE43 Mg alloy substrates. Surf Coat Technol2018; 344: 553–563.
MaYHanJWangM, et al.Electrophoretic deposition of graphene-based materials: a review of materials and their applications. J Materiomics2018; 4: 108–120.
22.
CorniIRyanMPBoccacciniAR. Electrophoretic deposition: from traditional ceramics to nanotechnology. J Eur Ceram Soc2008; 28: 1353–1367.
23.
KimJGuelcherSAGaroffS,et al.Two-particle dynamics on an electrode in ac electric fields. Adv Colloid Interface Sci2002; 96: 131–142.
24.
WoodardJRHilldoreAJLanSK, et al.The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity. Biomaterials2007; 28: 45–54.
25.
MaRLiYZhitomirskyI. Electrophoretic deposition of hyaluronic acid and composite films for biomedical applications. JOM2010; 62: 72–75.
26.
KleinCPde Blieck-HogemrstJMAWolkeJGC,et al.Studies of the solubility of different calcium phosphate ceramic particles in vitro. Biomaterials1990; 11: 509–512.
27.
PalaniveluRKalainathanSKumarAR. Characterization studies on plasma sprayed (AT/HA) bi-layered nano ceramics coating on biomedical commercially pure titanium dental implant. Ceram Int2014; 40: 7745–7751.
28.
AmaravathyPSathyanarayananSSowndaryaS,et al.Bioactive HA/TiO2 coating on magnesium alloy for biomedical applications. Ceram Int2014; 40: 6617–6630.
29.
El-GhannamA. Electrophoretic deposition of bioactive silica-calcium phosphate nanocomposite on Ti-6Al-4 V orthopedic implant. J Biomed Mater Res B2011; 99: 369–379.
30.
TorgboSSukyaiP. Fabrication of microporous bacterial cellulose embedded with magnetite and hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Chem Phys2019; 237: 121868.
31.
SahaNDubeyAKBasuB. Cellular proliferation, cellular viability, and biocompatibility of HA–ZnO composites. J Biomed Mater Res B2012; 100: 256–264.
32.
ThampiVASubramanianB. Enhancement of bioactivity of pulsed magnetron sputtered TiCxNy with bioactive glass (BAG) incorporated polycaprolactone (PCL) composite scaffold. J Alloys Compd2015; 649: 1210–1219.
33.
MishraDBhuniaBBanerjeeI, et al.Enzymatically crosslinked carboxymethyl–chitosan/gelatin/nano-hydroxyapatite injectable gels for in situ bone tissue engineering application. Mater Sci Eng C2011; 31: 1295–1304.
34.
SawalhaHSchroënKBoomR. Mechanical properties and porosity of polylactide for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 107: 82–93.
35.
HeavensSN. Electrophoretic deposition as a processing route for ceramics. Adv Ceram Process Technol1990; 1: 255–283.
FerrariBMorenoR. The conductivity of aqueous Al2O3 slips for electrophoretic deposition. Mater Lett1996; 28: 353–355.
38.
ErvinaJGhalebZAHamdanS,et al.Colloidal stability of water-based carbon nanotube suspensions in the electrophoretic deposition process: effect of applied voltage and deposition time. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 117: 1–10.
39.
BrownDRSaltFW. The mechanism of electrophoretic deposition. J Appl Chem1965; 15: 40–48.
40.
PishbinFMouriñoVGilchristJB, et al.Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, and composite coatings: influence of suspension medium and particle charge on coating quality. J Eur Ceram Soc2013; 33: 2777–2788.
41.
MohanLDurgalakshmiDBalasubramanianK. Influence of polymeric and sol–gel derived binders on crack-free electrophoretic deposited coatings on magnesium alloys. Surf Coat Technol2024; 450: 109155.
42.
NiuLYWangHZhaoXY, et al.Hydrothermal and plasma-assisted consolidation of hydroxyapatite coatings on magnesium for enhanced adhesion and corrosion resistance. Ceram Int2023; 49: 8651–8662.
43.
MoriTNagashimaHItoY, et al.Agglomeration of fine particles in water upon application of DC electric field. Miner Eng2019; 133: 119–126.
44.
HasegawaKKunugiSTatsumisagoM,et al.Preparation of thick films by electrophoretic deposition using surface-modified silica particles derived from sol-gel method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol1999; 15: 243–249.
45.
BesraLLiuM. A review on fundamentals and applications of electrophoretic deposition (EPD). Prog Mater Sci2007; 52: 1–61.
46.
BasuRNRandallCAMayoMJ. Fabrication of dense zirconia electrolyte films for tubular solid oxide fuel cells by electrophoretic deposition. J Am Ceram Soc2001; 84: 33–40.
47.
SansoneLMalachovskaVLa MannaP, et al.Nano chemical fabrication of a graphene oxide-based nanohybrid for label-free optical sensing with fiber optics. Sens Actuators B Chem2014; 202: 523–526.
48.
LeeVWhittakerLJayeC, et al.Large-area chemically modified graphene films: electrophoretic deposition and characterization by soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Chem Mater2009; 21: 3905–3916.
49.
TabeshESalimijaziHRKharazihaM, et al.Development of an in-situ chitosan-copper nanoparticle coating by electrophoretic deposition. Surf Coat Technol2019; 364: 239–247.
50.
SuYZhitomirskyI. Electrophoretic deposition of graphene, carbon nanotubes and composite films using methyl violet dye as a dispersing agent. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2013; 436: 97–103.
51.
KohATChenTPanL, et al.Effective hybrid graphene/carbon nanotubes field emitters by electrophoretic deposition. J Appl Phys2013; 113(17): 174909.
52.
DuJZhangYDengS, et al.Correlation between topographic structures and local field emission characteristics of graphene-sheet films. Carbon N Y2013; 61: 507–514.
53.
KarimiNKharazihaMRaeissiK. Electrophoretic deposition of chitosan reinforced graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite on the anodized titanium to improve biological and electrochemical characteristics. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 98: 140–152.
54.
LiuYZhangDPangS, et al.Size separation of graphene oxide using preparative free-flow electrophoresis. J Sep Sci2015; 38: 157–163.
55.
DibaMGarcia-GallasteguiATaylorRNK, et al.Quantitative evaluation of electrophoretic deposition kinetics of graphene oxide. Carbon N Y2014; 67: 656–661.
56.
SarkarPNicholsonPS. Electrophoretic deposition (EPD): mechanisms, kinetics, and application to ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc1996; 79(8): 1987–2002.
57.
AzizABintiSAAmirnordinSH, et al.Short review: electrophoretic deposition (EPD) on non-conductive substrate. Adv Mater Res. 2012; 488: 1358–1136.
58.
HeWZhuLChenH, et al.Electrophoretic deposition of graphene oxide as a corrosion inhibitor for sintered NdFeB. Appl Surf Sci. 2013; 279: 416–423.
59.
SubramanianPNiedziolka-JonssonJLesniewskiA, et al.Preparation of reduced graphene oxide–Ni(OH)2 composites by electrophoretic deposition: application for non-enzymatic glucose sensing. J Mater Chem A2014; 2: 5525–5533.
60.
WuMSLinYPLinCH,et al.Formation of nano-scaled crevices and spacers in NiO-attached graphene oxide nanosheets for supercapacitors. J Mater Chem2012; 22: 2442–2448.
61.
DrevetRFauréJBenhayouneH. Thermal treatment optimization of electrodeposited hydroxyapatite coatings on Ti6Al4 V substrate. Adv Eng Mater. 2012; 14: 377–382.
62.
DashMChielliniFOttenbriteRM,et al.Chitosan – A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2011; 36(8): 981–1014.
63.
Nasr AzadaniMZahediABowotoOK,et al.A review of current challenges and prospects of magnesium and its alloy for bone implant applications. Prog Biomater2022; 11: 1–26.
64.
BanerjeeCAl-SaadiSChoudharyL, et al.Magnesium implants: prospects and challenges. Materials (Basel)2019; 12: 136.
65.
DingW. Opportunities and challenges for the biodegradable magnesium alloys as next-generation biomaterials. Regen Biomater. 2016; 3: 79–86.
66.
WangYFuPWangN, et al.Challenges and solutions for the additive manufacturing of biodegradable magnesium implants. Engineering2020; 6: 1267–1275.
67.
KaushikVKumarNVigneshM. Magnesium role in additive manufacturing of biomedical implants – challenges and opportunities. Addit Manuf. 2022; 55: 102802.
68.
AllavikuttyRGuptaPSantraTS,et al.Additive manufacturing of Mg alloys for biomedical applications: current status and challenges. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2021; 18: 100276.
69.
KumarKGillRSBatraU. Challenges and opportunities for biodegradable magnesium alloy implants. Mater Technol. 2018; 33: 153–172.
70.
AmukarimiSMozafariM. Biodegradable magnesium-based biomaterials: an overview of challenges and opportunities. MedComm2021; 2: 123–144.
71.
RohitMGKatyalPGillV. Mg and its alloys, their challenges and opportunities for implants: a. Int Res J Eng Technol2020; 7: 2763–2779.
72.
UddinMSHallCMurphyP. Surface treatments for controlling corrosion rate of biodegradable mg and mg-based alloy implants. Sci Technol Adv Mater2015; 16: 053501.
73.
RamanRSHarandiSE. Resistance of magnesium alloys to corrosion fatigue for biodegradable implant applications: current status and challenges. Materials (Basel)2017; 10: 1316.
74.
LiLZhangMLiY, et al.Corrosion and biocompatibility improvement of magnesium-based alloys as bone implant materials: a review. Regen Biomater. 2017; 4: 129–137.
75.
SahaSLestariWDiniC, et al.Corrosion in Mg-alloy biomedical implants – the strategies to reduce the impact of the corrosion inflammatory reaction and microbial activity. J Magn Alloys2022; 10: 3306–3326.
76.
SinghIBSinghMDasS. A comparative corrosion behavior of Mg, AZ31 and AZ91 alloys in 3.5% NaCl solution. J Magn Alloys2015; 3: 142–148.
77.
LiXLiuXWuS, et al.Design of magnesium alloys with controllable degradation for biomedical implants: from bulk to surface. Acta Biomater2016; 45: 2–30.
78.
DasPKumarTSSahuKK,et al.Corrosion, stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue behavior of magnesium alloy bioimplants. Corros Rev. 2022; 40: 289–333.
79.
ChalisgaonkarR. Insight in applications, manufacturing and corrosion behaviour of magnesium and its alloys – A review. Mater Today Proc. 2020; 26: 1060–1071.
80.
SinghRVenkateshVKumarV. Corrosion: critical challenge in wider use of magnesium alloys. Metals (Basel)2018; 8: 127.
81.
NarayananTSParkISLeeMH. Strategies to improve the corrosion resistance of microarc oxidation (MAO) coated magnesium alloys for degradable implants: prospects and challenges. Prog Mater Sci. 2014; 60: 1–71.
82.
KirklandNTBirbilisNStaigerMP. Assessing the corrosion of biodegradable magnesium implants: a critical review of current methodologies and their limitations. Acta Biomater2012; 8: 925–936.
83.
WitteFHortNFeyerabendF,et al.Magnesium (Mg) corrosion: a challenging concept for degradable implants. in Corrosion of Magnesium Alloys, Woodhead Publishing, 2011, 403–425.
84.
TangJWangJXieX, et al.Surface coating reduces degradation rate of magnesium alloy developed for orthopaedic applications. J Orthop Transl2013; 1: 41–48.
85.
XiongYLuCWangC,et al.The n-MAO/EPD bio-ceramic composite coating fabricated on ZK60 magnesium alloy using combined micro-arc oxidation with electrophoretic deposition. Appl Surf Sci. 2014; 322: 230–235.
86.
AslSKFNemethSTanMJ. Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite coatings on AZ31 magnesium substrate for biodegradable implant applications. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater2014; 60: 74–79.
87.
TianQMLiuHN. Electrophoretic deposition and characterization of biocomposites on magnesium for orthopedic applications. Adv Mater Res. 2014; 922: 761–766.
88.
ZhangJDaiCWenZ,et al.Study on the effect of the coating thickness on corrosion behavior of AZ91D magnesium alloy in m-SBF. Int J Electrochem Sci2015; 10: 6002–6013.
89.
KumarRMKuntalKKSinghS, et al.Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite coating on Mg–3Zn alloy for orthopaedic application. Surf Coat Technol. 2016; 287: 82–92.
90.
SankarMSuwasSBalasubramanianS,et al.Comparison of electrochemical behavior of hydroxyapatite coated onto WE43 mg alloy by electrophoretic and pulsed laser deposition. Surf Coat Technol. 2017; 309: 840–848.
91.
AlaeiMAtapourMLabbafS. Electrophoretic deposition of chitosan-bioactive glass nanocomposite coatings on AZ91 Mg alloy for biomedical applications. Prog Org Coat. 2020; 147: 105803.
92.
AhangariMJoharMHSaremiM. Hydroxyapatite-carboxymethyl cellulose-graphene composite coating development on AZ31 magnesium alloy: corrosion behavior and mechanical properties. Ceram Int. 2021; 47: 3529–3539.
93.
AkramWKhanRPetrůM, et al.Hydroxyapatite coating for control degradation and parametric optimization of pure magnesium: an electrophoretic deposition technique for biodegradable implants. J Mater Res Technol2023; 26: 2587–2600.
94.
OlohundeST. Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite on homogenized magnesium based alloy for biomedical applications. PhD thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2022.
95.
KumarSGuptaRKArchanaK,et al.Development of ternary hydroxyapatite–Al2O₃–TiO2 nanocomposite coating on Mg alloy by electrophoretic deposition method. J Mater Eng Perform2024; 33: 5075–5084.
96.
ChongCYFadilNANorFM,et al.Effect of applied voltage on electrophoretic deposition of nano-hydroxyapatite coating on biodegradable AZ31 magnesium alloy and its corrosion properties. J Adv Manuf Technol2024; 18: 179–192.
97.
RadhiMAEngalimmdAMMAbdulkareemMH. Corrosion behavior of nano bio coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy by electrophoretic deposition for biomedical application. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 2025; 19(8).
98.
AverMPihtiliHAksakalB. A comparative study between the synthetic and synthesized hydroxyapatite derived from the natural shell waste and coating on AZ31 alloy: Enhanced mechanostructural and corrosion properties. Ceram Int2025; 51: 35104–35118.
99.
AhangariM, et al.Corrosion behavior and mechanical properties of HA–CMC–Gr composite coatings on AZ31 magnesium alloy. Corros Sci2021; 179: 109171.
100.
Pu’adNASMAminN. Syntheses of hydroxyapatite from natural sources: a review. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy2019; 14: 1–14.
101.
KumarSMoorthyP. Processing and characterization of eggshell-derived nano-hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Mater Today Proc2023; 65: 231–238.
102.
Waseem AkramAAhmadRHassanS, et al.Synergistic influence of carboxymethyl cellulose and graphene on hydroxyapatite electrophoretic coatings for magnesium alloys. Appl Surf Sci2021; 556: 149788.
103.
KumarRSinghVPatelD. Enhanced mechanical and biological behaviour of hydroxyapatite–alumina–titania ternary nanocomposite coatings on magnesium. J Alloys Compd2024; 976: 180167.
104.
LiJZhangYHuangQ. Synergistic effect of Al2O₃ and TiO2 nanoparticles on hydroxyapatite coatings: structure, corrosion, and bioactivity. Surf Coat Technol2023; 464: 129493.
105.
WuCWenZDaiC, et al.Fabrication of calcium phosphate/chitosan coatings on AZ91D magnesium alloy with a novel method. Surf Coat Technol. 2010; 204(20): 3336–3347.
106.
HöhlingerMChristaDZimmermannV, et al.Influence of proteins on the corrosion behavior of a chitosan-bioactive glass coated magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 100: 706–714.
107.
SinghSSinghGBalaN,et al.Characterization and preparation of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles loaded bioglass-chitosan nanocomposite coating on mg alloy and in vitro bioactivity assessment. Int J Biol Macromol2020; 151: 519–528.
108.
WiteckaAValetSBasistaM,et al.Electrophoretically deposited high molecular weight chitosan/bioactive glass composite coatings on WE43 magnesium alloy. Surf Coat Technol. 2021; 418: 127232.
109.
AkramMArshadNBraemA. Fabrication of corrosion-resistant chitosan–gelatin–bioactive glass-ZnO/CeO2 hybrid coating on magnesium ZK60 alloy by AC-EPD. J Taibah Univ Sci2021; 15: 312–320.
110.
SinghSSinghGBalaN. Electrophoretic deposition of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles incorporated hydroxyapatite-bioglass-chitosan nanocomposite coating on AZ91 Mg alloy. Mater Today Commun2021; 26: 101870.
111.
AziziAHAllahkaramSR. Electrochemical behaviour of nanostructured bioglass/alginate composite coating on magnesium alloy by electrophoretic deposition for orthopaedic application. J Ultrafine Grained Nanostruct Mater2022; 55.
112.
HassanMHKhuliefZT. Chitosan/hydroxyapatite coating of AZ91 magnesium alloy by using electrophoretic deposition. BIO Web Conf2023; 65: 07007.
113.
ManzurJAizazANawazMH, et al.Electrophoretic deposition of moringa loaded chitosan coatings on Mg: a study on antibacterial properties and degradation kinetics. Mater Lett. 2024; 354: 135430.
114.
NingCWangWZhuJ,et al.Corrosion behavior of ternary HA-NrGO-CS composite coatings via cathodic electrophoretic deposited on ZK60 Mg alloy combining with thermal annealing. Surf Coat Technol. 2024; 493: 131238.
115.
LoperenaAPSaidmanSBLópezAF, et al.Corrosion protection and antibacterial performance of a chitosan/salicylate coating electrogenerated on a magnesium alloy/ Results Surf Interfaces2024; 16: 100244.
116.
MofazaliPFarnoushH. Fabrication and characterization of Sr-modified Bredigite/chitosan nanocomposite coatings on AZ31 alloy via electrophoretic deposition for bone applications. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol2025: 1–17.
117.
RazaviMFathiMSavabiO, et al.In vivo assessments of bioabsorbable AZ91 magnesium implants coated with nanostructured fluoridated hydroxyapatite by MAO/EPD technique for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C2015; 48: 21–27.
118.
Cordero-AriasLBoccacciniARVirtanenS. Electrochemical behavior of nanostructured TiO2/alginate composite coating on magnesium alloy AZ91D via electrophoretic deposition. Surf Coat Technol. 2015; 265: 212–217.
119.
AmiriHMohammadiIAfsharA. Electrophoretic deposition of nano-zirconia coating on AZ91D magnesium alloy for bio-corrosion control purposes. Surf Coat Technol. 2017; 311: 182–190.
120.
SunJZhuYMengL, et al.Electrophoretic deposition of colloidal particles on Mg with cytocompatibility, antibacterial performance, and corrosion resistance. Acta Biomater2016; 45: 387–398.
121.
HuangWXuBYangW, et al.Corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite/magnesium phosphate/zinc phosphate composite coating deposited on AZ31 alloy. Surf Coat Technol. 2017; 326: 270–280.
122.
BehrangiSAghajaniH. Nano3YSZ electrophoretic deposition from acetylacetone+ ethanol solvent on the surface of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Micro Nano Lett2018; 13: 611–616.
123.
SinghSSinghGBalaN. Corrosion behavior and characterization of HA/Fe₃O₄/CS composite coatings on AZ91 Mg alloy by electrophoretic deposition. Mater Chem Phys. 2019; 237: 121884.
124.
AydinİBahçepinarAİGülC. Surface characterization of EPD coating on AZ91 Mg alloy produced by powder metallurgy. Rev Metal2020; 56: e176.
125.
MaqsoodMFRazaMAGhauriFA, et al.Corrosion study of graphene oxide coatings on AZ31B magnesium alloy. J Coat Technol Res2020; 17: 1321–1329.
126.
QinWKolooshaniAKolahdoozA, et al.Coating the magnesium implants with reinforced nanocomposite nanoparticles for use in orthopedic applications. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2021; 621: 126581.
127.
XiangQQinJQinT, et al.Kinetics study of anodic electrophoretic deposition for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coatings on AZ31 magnesium alloy. BMC Chem2022; 16: 92.
128.
ManzurJAkhtarMAizazA, et al.Electrophoretic deposition, microstructure, and selected properties of poly(lactic-co-glycolic). acid-based antibacterial coatings on Mg substrate. ACS Omega2023; 8: 18074–18089.
129.
HarisankarTKumarPAMohanM,et al.Experimenting electrophoretic deposition of zein/HA composite coating on Mg AZ31b alloy for biomedical application. in Int Conf Recent Adv Mater Sci Technol, Springer2024: 73–80.
130.
ZhangJChenCLiJ,et al.Effect of polytetrafluoroethylene coating on corrosion wear properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy by electrophoretic deposition. Coatings2024; 14: 664.
131.
YangDLFarazFWangJX,et al.Combination of 3D printing and electrospinning techniques for biofabrication. Adv Mater Technol. 2022; 7: 2101309.
132.
ZhangZFengYWangL, et al.A review of preparation methods of porous skin tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Today Commun2022; 32: 104109.
133.
HouLYinFWangS, et al.A review of thermal effects and substrate damage control in laser cleaning. Opt Laser Technol. 2024; 174: 110613.
134.
ManescuVAntoniacIAntoniacA, et al.Bone regeneration induced by patient-adapted Mg alloy-based scaffolds for bone defects: present and future perspectives. Biomimetics2023; 8: 618.
135.
RahmanMMBaluRAbrahamA, et al.Engineering a bioactive hybrid coating for in vitro corrosion control of magnesium and its alloy. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021; 4: 5542–5555.
136.
SinghNBatraUKumarK,et al.Investigating TiO2–HA–PCL hybrid coating as an efficient corrosion resistant barrier of ZM21 Mg alloy. J Magn Alloys2021; 9: 627–646.
137.
LiBZhangZLiuT, et al.Recent progress in functionalized coatings for corrosion protection of magnesium alloys – a review. Materials (Basel)2022; 15: 3912.
138.
TongPShengYHouR, et al.Recent progress on coatings of biomedical magnesium alloy. Smart Mater Med2022; 3: 104–116.
139.
PoinernGEJBrundavanamSFawcettD. Biomedical magnesium alloys: a review of material properties, surface modifications and potential as a biodegradable orthopaedic implant. Am J Biomed Eng2012; 2: 218–240.
140.
FarjaminejadSFarjaminejadRGarcia-GodoyF. Nanoparticles in bone regeneration: a narrative review of current advances and future directions in tissue engineering. J Funct Biomater2024; 15: 241.
141.
SaikiaN. Inorganic-based nanoparticles and biomaterials as biocompatible scaffolds for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering: current advances and trends of development. Inorganics2024; 12: 292.
142.
BairagiDMandalS. A comprehensive review on biocompatible Mg-based alloys as temporary orthopaedic implants: current status, challenges, and future prospects. J Magn Alloys2022; 10: 627–669.
143.
IbrahimMZSarhanAAYusufF,et al.Biomedical materials and techniques to improve the tribological, mechanical and biomedical properties of orthopedic implants – A review article, J Alloys Compd. 2017; 714: 636–667.
144.
NawawiNAAlqapASFSopyanI. Recent progress on hydroxyapatite-based dense biomaterials for load bearing bone substitutes. Recent Pat Mater Sci2011; 4: 63–80.
145.
GeethaMSinghAKAsokamaniR,et al.Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009; 54: 397–425.
146.
KumarSNehraMKediaD, et al.Nanotechnology-based biomaterials for orthopaedic applications: recent advances and future prospects. Mater Sci Eng C2020; 106: 110154.
147.
FanXYahiaLHSacherE. Antimicrobial properties of the Ag, Cu nanoparticle system. Biology (Basel)2021; 10: 137.
148.
EliazN. Corrosion of metallic biomaterials: a review. Materials (Basel)2019; 12: 407.
149.
de OliveiraMCLda SilvaRMPSoutoRM,et al.A review on the synergism between corrosion and fatigue of magnesium alloys: Mechanisms and processes on the micro-scale. J Magn Alloys2024.
150.
ShuaiCLiuLYangY, et al.Lanthanum-containing magnesium alloy with antitumor function based on increased reactive oxygen species. Appl Sci. 2018; 8: 2109.
151.
BensiamarFOlaldeBCifuentesSC, et al.Bioactivity of dexamethasone-releasing coatings on polymer/magnesium composites. Biomed Mater2016; 11: 055011.
152.
LiuYRathBTingartM,et al.Role of implants surface modification in osseointegration: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res A2020; 108: 470–484.
153.
KunrathMFDizFMMaginiR,et al.Nanointeraction: the profound influence of nanostructured and nano-drug delivery biomedical implant surfaces on cell behavior. Adv Colloid Interface Sci2020; 284: 102265.
154.
IjaolaAOBamideleEAAkisinCJ, et al.Wettability transition for laser textured surfaces: a comprehensive review. Surf Interfaces2020; 21: 100802.
155.
YangCJingXWangF, et al.Fabrication of controllable wettability of crystalline silicon surfaces by laser surface texturing and silanization, Appl Surf Sci2019; 497: 143805.
ShinSSeoJHanH, et al.Bio-inspired extreme wetting surfaces for biomedical applications. Materials (Basel)2016; 9: 116.
158.
AverMSadiqRJavedA. Shell-derived natural hydroxyapatite as a sustainable bioceramic for Mg-based implants: role of elemental dopants and morphology. Materials Science & Engineering C2024; 159: 114612.
159.
PaitalSROshidaY. Bioactivity evaluation of hydroxyapatite and composite coatings by SBF immersion and ALP assay methods: a comparative review. Acta Biomater2022; 141: 23–39.
160.
WangJGiridharanVShanovV, et al.Flow-induced corrosion behavior of absorbable magnesium-based stents. Acta Biomater2014; 10: 5213–5223.*
161.
FerroniMCocolaLHaickH,et al.Investigating flow-induced corrosion of magnesium in an ophthalmological environment. Materials (Basel)2024; 17: 4404.
162.
MacLucasTAhmadiMHaseebASMA,et al.Parametric analysis of coating-thickness development in electrophoretic deposition using Hamaker’s equation. Processing and Application of Ceramics2023; 17: 1–10.
163.
DibaMKharazihaMFathiMH,et al.Quantitative evaluation of the electrophoretic deposition process for biomedical coatings. Carbon N Y2014; 69: 79–90.
164.
SajiVS. Electrophoretic (EPD) coatings for magnesium alloys. Mater Res Bull2021; 142: 111419.
165.
HassanHWElsheikhAHAhmedA, et al.In-vitro monitoring of magnesium-based implants: corrosion, ion release and biological response. Int J Mol Sci2022; 23: 6099.
