Regional educational informatization (REI) is a key pathway to advancing educational equity and narrowing the digital divide, yet its actual impact on individual digital literacy lacks systematic empirical examination. This study empirically analyzes the impact of REI on digital literacy using quantitative regression approaches. Results show that REI significantly enhances individual digital literacy, with a more pronounced effect on digital acquisition and usage while exerting limited influence on digital awareness. Five core transmission mechanisms are identified: digital endowment empowerment, digital consumption driving, social capital accumulation, learning behavior promotion, and social interaction diffusion. Notably, REI exhibits a “disadvantaged support” effect, generating stronger positive impacts on individuals with lower educational attainment, women, and residents in economically, digitally or educationally underdeveloped regions, which aligns with the principles of educational equity and inclusiveness. Conversely, REI has a negative impact on residents in digitally advanced areas and fails to address the “digital outreach blind spots” faced by the elderly group, indicating the need to further optimize the educational informatization ecosystem for greater inclusiveness and age-friendliness. These findings deepen the understanding of REI's role in fostering digital literacy, provide empirical evidence for research on public education equity and educational ecology, and offer important theoretical and practical insights for optimizing REI development strategies and narrowing the digital literacy gap, particularly for digitally disadvantaged groups.
AcilarASæbøØ (2023) Towards understanding the gender digital divide: a systematic literature review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication72(3): 233–249.
2.
AhmedSRasheedT (2020) Relationship between personality traits and digital literacy skills: a study of university librarians. Digital Library Perspectives36(2): 191–206.
3.
AltDRaichelN (2020) Enhancing perceived digital literacy skills and creative self-concept through gamified learning environments: insights from a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research101: 101561.
4.
ApfeldBComanEGerringJ, et al. (2022) Education and social capital. Journal of Experimental Political Science9(2): 162–188.
5.
AudrinCAudrinB (2022) Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies27(6): 7395–7419.
6.
AydinM (2021) Does the digital divide matter? Factors and conditions that promote ICT literacy. Telematics and Informatics58: 101536.
7.
BanduraA (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review84(2): 191–215.
8.
BanduraA (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology12(1): 169.
9.
BrownJSCollinsADuguidP (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher18(1): 32–42.
10.
CariolleJ (2021) International connectivity and the digital divide in Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Economics and Policy55: 100901.
11.
Central Cybersecurity and Informatization Commission (2021) Outline of the action plan for improving national digital literacy and skills. Available at: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2021-11/05/c_1637708867754305.htm (accessed 11 August 2025).
12.
Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission Office (2024) China national survey report on digital literacy and skill development levels (2024). Available at: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2024-10/25/c_1731546599579826.htm (accessed 11 August 2025).
13.
ChenW (2013) The implications of social capital for the digital divides in America. The Information Society29(1): 13–25.
14.
ChenZCuiRTangC, et al. (2024) Can digital literacy improve individuals’ incomes and narrow the income gap?Technological Forecasting and Social Change203: 123332.
15.
ChengZ (2021) Education and consumption: evidence from migrants in Chinese cities. Journal of Business Research127: 206–215.
16.
ChernozhukovVChetverikovDDemirerM, et al. (2018) Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal21(1): C1–C68.
17.
Education Informatization Strategy Research Base (2022) Annual report on the Development of China’s Education Informatization (2021). Beijing: People’s Education Press.
18.
EynonRHelsperE (2014) Family dynamics and Internet use in Britain: what role do children play in adults’ engagement with the Internet?Information, Communication & Society18(2): 156–171.
19.
GonçalvesDACaceffoRValenteJA, et al. (2024) Enactive interaction in technology-based learning environments: a systematic literature review. Educational Technology & Society27(2): 87–113.
20.
HaleemAJavaidMQadriMA, et al. (2022) Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: a review. Sustainable Operations and Computers3: 275–285.
21.
HargittaiEPiperAMMorrisMR (2019) From Internet access to Internet skills: digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society18(4): 881–890.
22.
HaugeLDurgunoğluAYStewartJ (2024) Developing digital proficiencies of English learners in adult education. Frontiers in Education9: 1386738.
23.
HawamdehMAltınayZAltınayF, et al. (2022) Comparative analysis of students and faculty level of awareness and knowledge of digital citizenship practices in a distance learning environment: case study. Education and Information Technologies27(5): 6037–6068.
24.
HossainMASormunenE (2019) Does informal peer learning stimulate acquisition and development of ICT skills?Education for Information35(2): 129–148.
25.
InkpenACTsangEW (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review30(1): 146–165.
26.
KalkhaHKhiatABahnasseA, et al. (2023) The rising trends of smart e-commerce logistics. IEEE Access11: 33839–33857.
27.
KamalovFSantandreu CalongeDGurribI (2023) New era of artificial intelligence in education: towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability15(16): 12451.
28.
LauricellaARWartellaERideoutVJ (2015) Young children’s screen time: the complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology36: 11–17.
29.
LevinsonMGeronTBrighouseH (2022) Conceptions of educational equity. Aera Open8: 23328584221121344.
30.
LiuCFuG (2014) Interpretation of negative effects of informatization operation in basic education and their social impacts. E-education Research35(3): 33–37.
31.
LiuXZhangYTangY (2022) Ethical dilemmas of informatization policies in teacher education and their solutions. Education and Teaching Research36(3): 55–67.
32.
LythreatisSSinghSKEl-KassarAN (2022) The digital divide: a review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change175: 121359.
33.
LyuLZuchangB (2025) The influence of educational informatization on the transformation of teachers’ teaching style. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology8: 168–174.
34.
ManskiCF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies60(3): 531–542.
MubarakFSuomiR (2022) Elderly forgotten? Digital exclusion in the information age and the rising grey digital divide. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing59: 00469580221096272.
38.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
39.
NicaEStehelV (2021) Internet of things sensing networks, artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, and real-time process monitoring in sustainable industry 4.0. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics9(3): 35–47.
40.
OECD (2023) Shaping Digital Education: Enabling Factors for Quality, Equity and Efficiency. Paris: OECD Publishing.
41.
OstromVOstromE (1971) Public choice: a different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review31(2): 203–216.
42.
PutnamR (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
43.
ReddyPChaudharyKHusseinS (2023) A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon9(4): e14878.
44.
ScheerderAJVan DeursenAJVan DijkJA (2019) Internet use in the home: digital inequality from a domestication perspective. New Media & Society21(10): 2099–2118.
45.
SelwynN (2016) Is Technology Good for Education?Cambridge: Polity Press.
46.
SilajiT (2024) Addressing the digital divide in education: strategies and solutions. Urasian Experiment Journal of Scientific and Applied Research5(2): 49–52.
47.
TinmazHLeeYTFanea-IvanoviciM, et al. (2022) A systematic review on digital literacy. Smart Learning Environments9(1): 21.
48.
Ulfert-BlankASSchmidtI (2022) Assessing digital self-efficacy: review and scale development. Computers & Education191: 104626.
49.
UNESCO (2015) Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and framework for action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656 (accessed 11 August 2025).
Van DeursenAJVan DijkJA (2011) Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society13(6): 893–911.
52.
WangJZhuJLuoX (2021) Research on the measurement of China’s digital economy development and the characteristics. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics38: 26–42.
53.
WangY (2025, February) Regional fairness audit of educational informatization: construction and application of a dynamic evaluation framework for county-level resource compliance. In: Proceedings of the 2025 international conference on Big Data and informatization education, New York, NY. DOI: 10.1145/3729605.3729655.
54.
YanSYangY (2021) Education informatization 2.0 in China: motivation, framework, and vision. ECNU Review of Education4(2): 410–428.
55.
YangZWangYGanJ, et al. (2021) Design and research of intelligent question-answering (Q&A) system based on high school course knowledge graph. Mobile Networks and Applications26(5): 1884–1890.
56.
ZhangLZhouY (2021, June) Education informatization: an effective way to promote educational equity. In: 2020 international conference on data processing techniques and applications for cyber-physical systems: DPTA 2020, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-1726-3_103.
57.
ZhangY (2023) Measuring and applying digital literacy: implications for access for the elderly in rural China. Education and Information Technologies28(8): 9509–9528.
