This study delves into examining the urban-rural concentration of ICT and the factors contributing to inequality in ICT access in India. We use data from the National Family Health Survey 2019-21 (NFHS-5), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. The study applies spatial concentration and Erreygers concentration index (ECI) to quantify and decompose socioeconomic inequalities in ICT access. The findings reveal that urban areas in the western region exhibit the highest concentration of internet and mobile phone access, whereas ICT exclusion is notably prevalent in rural regions of the eastern states. Furthermore, access to ICT is concentrated among the wealthy households. The decomposition analysis reveals heterogeneity in the contributors to ICT inequality. Wealth, education and gender exacerbate overall inequality, while residence reduces inequality in mobile access. These patterns reflect persistent socio-economic and spatial divide, underlining the necessity of targeted policy interventions.
AissaouiN (2022) The digital divide: A literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication71(8/9): 686–708.
4.
AkhterSDasvarmaGLSaikiaU (2020) Reluctance of women of lower socio-economic status to use maternal healthcare services – does only cost matter?PLoS One15(9): e0239597.
5.
AliMAAlamKTaylorB (2019) Measuring the concentration of information and communication technology infrastructure in Australia: Do affordability and remoteness matter?Socio-Economic Planning Sciences70: 100737.
6.
AshrafMHanischJSwatmanP (2008) ICT Intervention in the ‘chandanbari’ village of Bangladesh: Results from a field study. Information Systems Frontiers11(2): 155–166.
7.
AsraniC (2022) Spanning the digital divide in India: Barriers to ICT adoption and usage. Journal of Public Affairs22(4): e2598.
8.
BapujiHPatelCErtugG, et al. (2020) Corona crisis and inequality: Why management research needs a societal turn. Journal of Management46(7): 1205–1222.
9.
BasuS (2004) E-government and developing countries: An overview. International Review of Law Computers & Technology18(1): 109–132.
BuchiMJustNLatzerM (2015) Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in internet use. New Media & Society18(11): 2703–2722.
12.
ChandraRPatelJKSrivastavaS, et al. (2024) An analysis of predictors and wealth-based inequality in internet use among women in India: Aiming for better digital health outcomes. BMC Digital Health2: 1.
13.
ChantzarasAEYfantopoulosJN (2018) Income-related health inequalities among the migrant and native-born populations in Greece during the economic crisis: A decomposition analysis. European Journal of Public Health28(suppl_5): 24–31.
14.
ChenJWangTFangZ, et al. (2023) Research on elderly users’ intentions to accept wearable devices based on the improved UTAUT model. Frontiers in Public Health10: 1035398.
ClaytonJMacdonaldSJ (2013) The limits of technology: Social class, occupation and digital inclusion in the city of Sunderland, England. Information, Communication & Society16(6): 945–966.
17.
ConstancioF (2024) The digital divide research in sub-saharan education: Representations, localisation of elements, and theoretical implications. Policy Futures in Education23(2): 427–445.
18.
CroccoMAGalinariRLemosMB, et al. (2006) Metodologia de identificação de aglomerações produtivas locais. Nova Economia16(2): 211–241.
19.
Cruz-JesusFOliveiraTBacaoF (2012) Digital divide across the European union. Information & Management49: 278–291.
20.
De BritoSRDa SilvaADSCruzAG, et al. (2016) Concentration of access to information and communication technologies in the municipalities of the Brazilian legal Amazon. PLoS One11(4): e0152655.
21.
ErreygersG (2009) Correcting the concentration index. Journal of Health Economics28(2): 504–515.
22.
HelsperEJvan DeursenAJEynonR (2015) Tangible Outcomes of Internet Use. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes. Report, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford.
23.
HilbertM (2016) The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014. Telecommunications Policy40(6): 567–581.
IsraelashviliMKimTBukobzG (2012) Adolescents’ over-use of the cyber world – internet addiction or identity exploration?Journal of Adolescence35(2): 417–424.
27.
KennedyC (2014) Communicating disparity: How social design can create public engagement with issues of inequality. Journal of Development and Communication Studies3(1): 24–34. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/jdcs/article/view/112351.
28.
KhanGFMoonJParkHW, et al. (2010) A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: A scientometrics approach. Scientometrics87(2): 267–286.
LooBPYNganYL (2012) Developing mobile telecommunications to narrow digital divide in developing countries? Some lessons from China. Telecommunications Policy36: 888–900.
33.
MyovellaGKaracukaMHaucapJ (2021) Determinants of digitalization and digital divide in sub-saharan African economies: A spatial durbin analysis. Telecommunications Policy45(10): 102224.
34.
NarayanaMR (2011) Telecommunications services and economic growth: Evidence from India. Telecommunications Policy35(2): 115–127.
35.
NguyenA (2012) The digital divide versus the “digital delay”: Implications from a forecasting model of online news adoption and use. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics8(2): 251–268.
36.
NiehavesBPlattfautR (2014) Internet adoption by the elderly: Employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems23(6): 708–726.
37.
NishidaTPickJBSarkarA (2014) Japan's prefectural digital divide: A multivariate and spatial analysis. Telecommunications Policy38(11): 992–1010.
38.
NishijimaMIvanauskasTMSartiFM (2017) Evolution and determinants of digital divide in Brazil (2005–2013). Telecommunications Policy41(1): 12–24.
39.
O’DonnellOO’NeillSVan OurtiT, et al. (2016) Conindex: Estimation of concentration indices. Stata Journal16(1): 112–138.
40.
O’DonnellOVan DoorslaerEWagstaffA, et al. (2007) Analyzing Health Equity using Household Survey Data: A Guide to Techniques and their Implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/633931468139502235.
PadhiBRaySLalhriatchianiX (2023) Access and uses of ICTs: Can virtual learning be an alternative mode of education in India?Indian Journal of Human Development17(2): 271–289.
43.
ParkS (2017) Digital Capital. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
PickJSarkarA (2016) Theories of the digital divide: Critical comparison. Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)2016: 3888–3897.
45.
PickJBNishidaT (2015) Digital divides in the world and its regions:A spatial and multivariate analysis of technological utilization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change91: 1–17.
46.
RagneddaM (2017) The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. New York: Routledge.
47.
RagneddaMMuschertGW (2013) The Digital Divide: The Internet and Social Inequality in International Perspective. London: Routledge.
48.
ReimersFM (2022) Learning from a pandemic: The impact of COVID-19 on education around the world. In: ReimersFM (ed) Primary and Secondary Education During Covid-19. Cham: Springer, 1–37.
49.
ScheerderAvan DeursenAvan DijkJ (2017) Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics34(8): 1607–1624.
50.
SchmitzHNadviK (1999) Clustering and industrialisation: Introduction. World Development27(9): 1503–1514.
51.
ShibreGMekonnenWMariamDH (2023) Decomposition analysis of women’s empowerment-based inequalities in the use of maternal health care services in Ethiopia: Evidence from demographic and health surveys. PLoS One18(4): e0285024.
52.
SoomroKAKaleUCurtisR, et al. (2020) Digital divide among higher education faculty. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education17(1): 1–16.
53.
StumpRLGongWLiZ (2008) Exploring the digital divide in mobile-phone adoption levels across countries. Journal of Macromarketing28(4): 397–412.
54.
Taleb El Hassen MVCabasesJMMillsS, et al. (2022) Changes in inequality in use of maternal health care services: Evidence from skilled birth attendance in Mauritania for the period 2007–2015. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(6): 3566.
55.
TewathiaNKamathAIlavarasanPV (2020) Social inequalities, fundamental inequities, and recurring of the digital divide: Insights from India. Technology in Society61: 101251.
56.
Van de PoelEVan DoorslaerEO'DonnellO (2012) Measurement of inequity in health care with heterogeneous response of use to need. Journal of Health Economics31(4): 676–689.
57.
Van DeursenAJHelsperEJ (2015) The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online?Communication and Information Technologies Annual9: 29–52. DOI: 10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002.
58.
Van DeursenAJvan DijkJAGM (2018) The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media and Society21(2): 354–375.
59.
Van DijkJAGM (2006) Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics34(4–5): 221–235.
60.
VenkateshVMorrisMGDavisGB, et al. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly27(3): 425–478. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540.
61.
WagstaffAvan DoorslaerE (2003) Catastrophe and impoverishment in paying for health care: With applications to Vietnam 1993–98. Health Economics12(9): 921–934.
62.
WilliamsFPhilipLFarringtonJ, et al. (2016) Digital by default’ and the ‘hard to reach’: Exploring solutions to digital exclusion in remote rural areas. Local Economy31(7): 757–777.
63.
WitteJCMannonSE (2010) The Internet and Social Inequalities. New York: Routledge.
64.
YuL (2006) Understanding information inequality: Making sense of the literature of the information and digital divides. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science38(4): 229–252.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
