The open science paradigm has promoted new forms of collaboration in the production of knowledge, including citizen science, a model that encourages public participation in scientific projects. Libraries, as spaces for access to knowledge, can play a key role in these processes, whether by informing, providing resources, or leading initiatives. This study analyzes the involvement of Spanish libraries in citizen science by examining their institutional websites and conducting a consultation with the library community through the IweTel email distribution list. The results show that, although university libraries have begun to incorporate citizen science into their discourse, their participation remains limited, while public libraries have yet to significantly adopt this approach. The study discusses potential factors contributing to this low level of involvement and highlights opportunities to strengthen the role of libraries in this field.
AlonsoJQuindeM (2023) Ciencia ciudadana y bibliotecas: participación ciudadana en la concreción y difusión contenidos científicos. 26, pp.18–24. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10366/153009.
2.
ArnsteinSR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association85(1): 24–34.
3.
ArroyoNCabréACuixartE, et al. (2024) Biblioteques públiques i ciència ciutadana: una visió des de l’experiència a la Biblioteca Sagrada Família - Josep M. Ainaud de Lasarte (Biblioteques de barcelona). Item: revista de biblioteconomia i documentació76: 19–32.
4.
AuerbachJBarthelmessELCavalierD, et al. (2019) The problem with delineating narrow criteria for citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(31): 15336–15337.
5.
AyrisPIgnatT (2018) Defining the role of libraries in the Open Science landscape: a reflection on current European practice. Open Information Science2(1): 1–22.
6.
BalukKWGillettJWeaverL (2024) Public library-university/college research partnership toolkit. Hamilton Public Library. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30533.
7.
BartumeusFPeñaAAgellG (2020) Ciencia ciudadana y aprendizaje servicio. Asociación Centre Promotor d’Aprenentatge Servei. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3924243.
8.
BenllochLLópez-NicolásMFioravantiH, et al. (2023) La participación ciudadana en las bibliotecas públicas españolas: Informe de investigación. Consejo de Cooperación Bibliotecaria. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10421/9254.
9.
BirkKTõisteTIgnatT, et al. (2024) Implementing citizen science activities in Baltic university libraries: on the road to a citizen science hub. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries34(1): 1–34.
10.
BonneyRCooperCBDickinsonJ, et al. (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience59(11): 977–984.
11.
BowserACooperCde SherbininA, et al. (2020) Still in need of norms: the state of the data in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice5(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.303.
12.
Caridad SebastiánMGarcía LópezFMartínez CardamaS, et al. (2018) Bibliotecas y empoderamiento: servicios innovadores en un entorno de crisis. Revista Española De Documentación Científica41(2): e206.
CigariniABonhoureIVicensJ, et al. (2021) Public libraries embrace citizen science: strengths and challenges. Library & Information Science Research43(2): 101090.
15.
CohenCCheneyLDuongK, et al. (2015) Identifying opportunities in citizen science for academic libraries. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship79(Winter 2015). doi:10.5062/F4BR8Q66.
16.
D’OnofrioGArzaVActisG (2024) Ciencia ciudadana en América Latina: perspectivas y políticas públicas. Perfiles Educativos46(184): 194–204.
17.
European Commission. (2016) Open innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: A Vision for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/061652.
18.
European Commission. (2020) Progress on Open Science: Towards a Shared Research Knowledge System (R. Lawrence, ed.). UE Publications Office. DOI: 10.2777/00139.
19.
Greshake TzovarasBWorthingtonSKaarstedT (2024) Citizen Science for Research Libraries: A Guide. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. DOI: 10.25815/2TJ5-0289.
20.
HaklayM (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation. In SuiDElwoodSGoodchildM (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge. Springer Netherlands, pp.105–122. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7.
21.
HaklayMDörlerDHeiglF, et al. (2021) What is citizen science? The challenges of definition. The Science of Citizen Science: 13–33. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2.
22.
HeiglFKieslingerBPaulKT, et al. (2019) Toward an international definition of citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(17): 8089–8092.
23.
IgnatTAyrisPLabastidaIJI, et al. (2018) Merry work: libraries and citizen science. Insights the UKSG Journal31. DOI: 10.1629/uksg.431.
24.
IgnatTCavalierDNickersonC (2019) Citizen science and libraries: waltzing towards a collaboration. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen Und Bibliothekare72(2): 328–336.
25.
KaarstedTBlakeONielsenK, et al. (2023) How European research libraries can support citizen-enhanced open science. Open Information Science7(1): 20220146.
26.
KaarstedTOvergaardAK (2018) A new trend in media and library collaboration within citizen science? The case of ‘a healthier Funen’. LIBER QUARTERLY28(1): 1–17.
27.
Kowalska-ChrzanowskaM (2024) Involvement of Polish libraries in citizen science. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. DOI: 10.1177/09610006241265097.
Martin-MelonRHernández-PérezTMartínez-CardamaS (2023) Research data services (RDS) in Spanish academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship49(4): 102732.
MumelašDFilipetiA (2025) Exploring the perspectives of Croatian librarians on citizen science. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries35(1): 1–32.
32.
MumelašDMartekA (2024) Benefits of citizen science for libraries. Publications12(1): 8.
33.
NurfarawahidahBKaurKAspuraMKYI (2023) Exploring citizen science participation and challenges in academic libraries: a comprehensive qualitative study. Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries25: 38–64.
34.
OECD. (2015) Making open science a reality. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 25. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en.
35.
OltraAPieraJFerrando-GonzálezL (2022) Breve guía sobre Ciencia Ciudadana CSIC. CSIC-Vicepresidencia Adjunta de Organización y Cultura Cientifica.
36.
OpryshkoTNazarovetsS (2021) Case study: citizen science in digital humanities context. In: Digital humanities workshop, pp.198–203. DOI: 10.1145/3526242.3526246.
37.
PerellóJBonhoureICigariniA, et al. (2019). Ciència ciutadana a les biblioteques: Observa, analitza, crea i participa, p.54. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3540829.
38.
PimentelFASEsteves GomesLI (2024) Data on librarians’ perceptions of participation in a citizen science project in a network of public libraries. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science47(2): 11–17.
39.
RammutloaMW (2023) The missing link: the capacity development for academic librarians to sustain citizen science at university libraries. Library Management44(6/7): 437–447.
RoySEdwardsM (2019) Citizen science during the flint, Michigan federal water emergency: ethical dilemmas and lessons learned. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice4(1): 1–28.
42.
Santos-HermosaGBoté-VericadJ-J (2024) Spanish academic libraries’ perceptions of Open Science. Drivers and barriers, level of knowledge and training. Education for Information40(2): 139–162.
43.
Sánchez-NogalesE (2019) ComunidadBNE: El proyecto de enriquecimiento colaborativo de la Biblioteca Nacional de España. Mi Biblioteca: La Revista del Mundo Bibliotecario59: 68–72.
44.
SchrögelPKolleckA (2019) The many faces of participation in science: literature review and proposal for a three-dimensional framework. Science and Technology Studies32(2): 77–99.
45.
SerranoFHolocher-ErtlTKieslingerB, et al. (2014) White paper on citizen science for Europe. Socientize consortium.
46.
SheffieldMBurtonKB (2022) Research data management needs assessment of Clemson University. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication10(1). DOI: 10.31274/jlsc.13970.
47.
ShirkJLBallardHLWildermanCC, et al. (2012) Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society17(2): 29.
48.
SieberR (2006) Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers96(3): 491–507.
Spain. (2022) Ley 17/2022, de 5 de septiembre, por la que se modifica la Ley 14/2011, de 1 de junio, de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación. Boletín Oficial del Estado núm. 214, de 06/09/2022. Available at: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2022/09/05/17/con.
Stilund HansenJ (2021) Citizen science skilling for library staff, researchers, and the public. In: KaarstedTWorthingtonS (eds) Series: Citizen Science for Research Libraries — A Guide. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group, pp.1–37.
53.
Stilund HansenJGadegaardSHansenKK, et al. (2021) Research data management challenges in citizen science projects and recommendations for library support services. A scoping review and case study. Data Science Journal20(1): 25.
54.
TautkevičienėGPranckutėA (2024) Competences of librarians in performing different roles in citizen science projects. University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings (9): 226–236. DOI: 10.15802/unilib/2024_316954.
55.
UNESCO. (2021) Recommendation on Open Science. Paris: UNESCO. DOI: 10.54677/MNMH8546.
56.
WiederkehrS (2019) Open data for the crowd: an account of citizen science at ETH library. LIBER Quarterly29(1): 1.
57.
WigginsACrowstonK (2011) From conservation to crowdsourcing: a typology of citizen science. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207.
58.
WorthingtonSWallisKKaarstedT (2023) Library infrastructures and citizen science. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. DOI: 10.25815/TZ0X-M353.
