Investigating researchers’ attitude toward predatory publishing in Tanzanian universities

Abstract

Predatory publishing poses significant challenges to research integrity, yet limited attention has been given to researchers’ attitudes and engagement with such outlets in Tanzanian universities. This study explores the attitudes of academic staff at the University of Dodoma (UDOM) and Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) toward predatory publishing and examines factors influencing their involvement. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected through questionnaires from 201 academic staff and interviews with research coordinators and library directors. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative responses were thematically analyzed. Findings reveal that although many researchers felt confident in identifying predatory publishers, 90% still expressed a need for more training. Despite 81.6% acknowledging reputational risks, 41.8% admitted to publishing in such publishers, often due to institutional pressure and limited awareness. Study highlights the need for stronger institutional support, including targeted training and clear publishing guidelines, to promote ethical research dissemination.