Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Strategic approaches for enhanced digital scholarly publishing and digital literacy in African academic and research institutions: A systematic review (2000–2024)
This study examined trends, barriers, and strategic approaches to enhance digital scholarly publishing and digital literacy in African academic and research institutions. A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A total of 954 records were initially identified from databases including Education Resource Information Centre (ERIC), Web of Science, and from Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, data sources in Publish or Perish software. After screening, 64 studies published between 2000 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate growing scholarly interest, with publication peaking in 2024 (12 studies; 18.8%). Nigeria contributed the most studies (13; 20.3%), followed by South Africa (11; 17.2%) and Kenya (8; 12.5%). Most studies employed qualitative designs (13; 20.3%), using questionnaires (14; 21.9%) and interviews (10; 15.6%). University faculty and staff were the most studied group (8; 12.5%). Key barriers included low visibility of African research (39; 60.9%), lack of institutional support (38; 59.4%), and limited awareness of publishing opportunities (35; 54.7%). Infrastructure challenges such as under-resourced universities (34; 53.1%) and limited digital access (33; 51.6%) were prevalent. Digital literacy issues focused on limited professional development (24; 32.8%). Strategic interventions emphasized digital skills training (24; 37.5%), policy development (22; 34.4%), improved internet access, and international collaboration (19 each; 29.7%). This review underscores the need for targeted investment, supportive policies, and international partnerships to strengthen Africa's digital research landscape. Addressing these challenges can bridge the digital divide, enhance scholarly output, and elevate African contributions to global academic discourse.
AhmadSMohd NoorASAlwanAA, et al. (2023). eLearning acceptance and adoption challenges in higher education. Sustainability15(7): 6190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076190
3.
AndemaS (2014) Promoting digital literacy in African education: ICT innovations in a Ugandan primary teachers’ college. Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0167565.
4.
BaroEEEzeME (2017) Perceptions, preferences of digital scholarly publishing in open access routes: a survey of academic librarians in Nigeria. Information and Learning Science118(3/4): 152–169.
5.
BaroEEObaroOGAdubaED (2019) An assessment of digital literacy skills and knowledge-based competencies among librarians working in university libraries in Africa. Digital Library Perspectives35(3/4): 172–192.
6.
BellourL (2021) Publish or perish: digital scholarly publishing challenges in Africa. Algerian Scientific Journal Platform. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/178421.
BosahGOkejiCCBaroEE (2017) Perceptions, preferences of digital scholarly publishing in open access journals: a survey of academic librarians in Africa. Digital Library Perspectives33(4): 378–394.
9.
BouaamriAOtikeFHajdu BarátA (2024) A review of the effectiveness of collaborations and partnerships in sustaining digital literacy. The Serials Librarian85(7–8): 232–246.
10.
BrownLGriffithsRRascoffM, et al. (2007) University publishing in a digital age. The Journal of Electronic Publishing10(3). DOI: 10.3998/3336451.0010.301.
11.
ChanL (2004) Supporting and enhancing scholarship in the digital age: the role of open-access institutional repositories. Canadian Journal of Communication29(3-4): 277–300.
12.
ChigwadaJ (2024) A proposed framework for a digital literacy course for artificial intelligence in academic libraries. South African Journal of Library and Information Science90(2): 1–8.
13.
ChristianG (2008) Issues and challenges to the development of open access institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1323387.
14.
DiseiyeOUkubeyinjeSEOladokunBD, et al. (2024) Emerging technologies: leveraging digital literacy for self-sufficiency among library professionals. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research3: 592.
EzemaIJEzeJU (2024) Status and challenges of institutional repositories in university libraries in South-East Nigeria: implications for visibility and ranking of Nigerian universities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship50(2): 102834.
17.
FalloonG (2020) From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development68(5): 2449–2472.
18.
GicheruWMwangiN (2023) Identifying the need to institutionalize digital equity among faculty: the experience of the Kenya Medical Training College. In Frontiers in Education (8): 1252842.
19.
GilsterP (1997) Digital Literacy. Seoul Heanaem.
20.
HarleJLampteyBRMwangiANzegwuFOkereO (2021)Creating Digital Content and Delivering Digital Learning in African Universities.International Network for Advancing Science and Policy (INASP). The British Council.
21.
IvwighreghwetaOOnoriodeOK (2012) Open access and digital scholarly publishing: opportunities and challenges to Nigerian researchers. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal33. http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl33IO.pdf.
22.
Jantjies M Andamp; DalasileV (2019) Digital Literacy Amongst First Year University Students from Under-Resourced Schools Proceedings of the IADIS (International Association for the Development of the Information Society) Digital Library.
23.
Jorge-VázquezJNáñez AlonsoSLFierro SaltosWRPacheco MendozaS (2021) Assessment of digital competencies of university faculty and their conditioning factors: Case study in a technological adoption context. Education Sciences11(10): 637.
24.
KerkhoffSNMakubuyaT (2022) Professional development on digital literacy and transformative teaching in a low-income country: a case study of rural Kenya. Reading Research Quarterly57(1): 287–305.
25.
LawNWooDde la TorreJWongG (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
LundBDWangTShamsiA, et al. (2023) Barriers to digital scholarly publishing among library and information science researchers: international perspectives. Information Development39(2): 376–389.
28.
LwogaETQuestierF (2014) Open access behaviors and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal31(1): 33–48.
29.
Machin-MastromatteoJD (2021) Information and digital literacy initiatives. Information Development37(3): 329–333.
30.
MartzoukouK (2021) Academic libraries in COVID-19: a renewed mission for digital literacy. Library Management42(4/5): 266–276.
31.
MhlongoMNgulubeP (2018) Public Libraries as Conduits for Indigenous Knowledge in South Africa. Library Philosophy and Practice.
32.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Bmj339.
MwangiBSmithS (2021) P-EGS12 An observational study investigating the differences the COVID-19 Pandemic had on admissions, methods of injury in a tertiary trauma centre in a major UK City. British Journal of Surgery108(Supplement_9): znab430-072.
35.
NawazAKundiGM (2010). Digital literacy: An analysis of the contemporary paradigms. Journal of Science and Technology Education Research1(2): 19–29.
36.
OchollaDN (2011) An overview of issues, challenges and opportunities of scholarly publishing in information studies in Africa. African Journal of Library,Archives and Information Science21(1): 1–16.
37.
OkechukwuOCNdubuisi-OkohEEOkocheC, et al. (2024) Digital scholarly publishing practices among LIS lecturers in higher institutions of learning in Nigeria. Journal of Digital Learning and Education4(1): 50–60.
38.
Ondari-OkemwaE (2007) Scholarly publishing in sub-Saharan Africa in the twenty-first century: challenges and opportunities. First Monday. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i10.1966.
39.
OparindeKGovenderVAdedokunT, et al. (2024) Key developments in global digital scholarly publishing: negotiating a double-edged sword. Learned Publishing37(3). DOI: 10.1002/leap.1604.
40.
RogersEM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
41.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ372: 71.
42.
SpanteMHashemiSSLundinM, et al. (2018) Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education5(1): 1519143.
TakavarashaSCilliersLChinyamurindiW (2018) Navigating the unbeaten track from digital literacy to digital citizenship: A case of university students in South Africa’s Eastern Cape province. Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa9(1): 1–15.
45.
TellaAOnyanchaB (2021) Digital scholarly publishing experience of postgraduate students in Nigerian universities. Accountability in Research28(7): 395–427.
46.
UtunenHAttiasMGeorgeR, et al. (2020) Global access to OpenWHO’s online learning resources for COVID-19. In The Importance of Health Informatics in Public Health during a Pandemic. IOS Press, pp. 304–305.
47.
Van SchalkwykFLuescherTM (2017) The African University Press. Cape Town: African Minds, p. 62.
48.
VeletsianosGKimmonsR (2012) Networked participatory scholarship: emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Computers & Education58(2): 766–774.
49.
WaithakaMChilimoWOnyanchaOB (2022) Factors influencing the adoption and use of open access digital scholarly publishing in selected public universities in Kenya. South African Journal of Library and Information Science88(1): 1–14. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-liasa_v88_n1_a8.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
