This paper explores Oman's research landscape through bibliometric and altimetric techniques applied to 43,710 Scopus-indexed documents from 1912 to 2024. Using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix tools, along with data from six ranking systems and Altmetric.com, the analysis reveals that 96% of Oman's publications on Scopus emerged after 2000. The leading fields are Medicine (13.10%), Engineering (11.46%), and Computer Science (8.29%), with international collaboration accounting for 63.47% of publications. The primary research partners are India, the UK, and the USA. Sultan Qaboos University is Oman's highest-ranking institution, placing 362nd globally (QS 2025), while most other universities in the Sultanate struggle to achieve rankings, showing only ∼20.1% overall coverage—with notable disparities between Life Sciences (high coverage) and Social Sciences (low coverage). To date, no comprehensive study in Oman has combined bibliometric, ranking, and altmetric analyses to offer unique recommendations based on bibliometrics. These findings carry important implications for Oman's research policy and institutional strategy, underscoring the necessity for targeted support in underperforming fields, improved international collaboration, and enhanced public engagement strategies to ensure the nation remains visible in the global academic arena.
Abdul-MajeedGMahmoodWNamerNS (2021) Measuring research performance of Iraqi universities using scopus data. Scientometrics126(3): 2349–2363.
3.
AjayanSBalasubramanianSRamachandranS (2022) Benchmarking the research performance of United Arab Emirates with gulf cooperation council countries–A bibliometric study. Frontiers in Education. Frontiers Media SA792548: 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.792548.
4.
Al-DuwaishAShehataAFarragA, et al. (2022) The contribution of Saudi Arabian scholars to the literature on COVID-19: A bibliometric study. Science & Technology Libraries41(3): 233–265.
5.
Al-FarsiYMAlbaliNHAlsaqabiMK, et al. (2021) Period-prevalence and publication rate of health research productivity in seven Arabian gulf countries: Bibliometric analysis from 1996 to 2018. Oman Medical Journal36(6): e316.
6.
Al-JamimiHABinMakhashenGMBornmannL, et al. (2023) Saudi Arabia Research: Academic insights and trend analysis. Scientometrics128(10): 5595–5627.
7.
Al-LamkiSM (2002) Higher education in the sultanate of Oman: The challenge of access, equity and privatization. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management24(1): 75–86.
8.
Al-MarzouqiAHArabiAA (2022) Research performance of the GCC countries: A comparative analysis of quantity and quality. Heliyon8(11), https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(22)02597-X.
AlhooriHFurutaRTabetM, et al. (2014) Altmetrics for country-level research assessment. In: The Emergence of Digital Libraries–Research and Practices: 16th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2014, Chiang Mai, Thailand, November 5-7, 2014. Proceedings 16. Springer, 59–64. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-12823-8_7
Al MarzouqiAHHAlameddineMSharifA, et al. (2019) Research productivity in the United Arab Emirates: A 20-year bibliometric analysis. Heliyon5(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02819.
AriaMCuccurulloC (2017) Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics11(4): 959–975.
16.
BabourAAlzamzamiOAdedayoA, et al. (2021) International publication trends and collaboration impact on the scientific research of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Scientometric Research10(3): 328–336.
17.
BadranABadranS (2019) Indicators of institutional and program ranking of universities with reference to the Arab world. Major challenges facing higher education in the Arab world: Quality assurance and relevance. 179-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03774-1_9.
18.
Ballesteros-RodríguezJDe Saá-PérezPGarcía-CarbonellN, et al. (2020) Exploring the determinants of scientific productivity: a proposed typology of researchers. Journal of Intellectual Capital 23 (2):195-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-07-2019-0178.
19.
BarnyF (1912) The Koran doctrine of redemption. The Muslim World2(1): 60–65.
20.
BarréR (1991) Clustering research fields for macro-strategic analysis: A comparative specialization approach. Scientometrics22: 95–112.
21.
BhandariVMohiteV (2024) Role of higher education institutions in developing digital competence in Sultanate of Oman: a step towards achieving Vision 2040. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2023-0639
BuckinghamLRamachandranK (2016) Between the covers: A case study of scholarly journal publishing in Oman. Language, Identity and Education on the Arabian Peninsula: Bilingual Policies in a Multilingual Context166: 20.
24.
ChenK-hTangM-cWangC-m, et al. (2015) Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan. Scientometrics102: 97–112.
25.
CristJT (2017) “A Fever of Research”: Scientific Journal Article Production and the Emergence of a National Research System in Qatar, 1980–2011. The Century of Science. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp.227-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920170000033011.
26.
DingXYangZ (2022) Knowledge mapping of platform research: A visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Electronic Commerce Research: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7.
27.
El-ShibinyM (1997) Higher education in Oman: Its development and prospects. In: Higher Education in the Gulf: Problems and Prospects. University of Exeter Press, 150–181.
28.
EldakarMAM (2019) Who reads international Egyptian academic articles? An altmetrics analysis of mendeley readership categories. Scientometrics121(1): 105–135.
29.
El SayedSAl-HababiRRahmanMM (2023) Gulf studies: The imperatives of area studies in the gulf region. Social Sciences12(5): 61.
30.
Estrada-RealACCantu-OrtizFJ (2022) A data analytics approach for university competitiveness: The QS world university rankings. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)16(3): 871–891.
31.
Flores-VargasXGonzález-BrambilaCNPérez-AngónMÁ (2023) Geographical characterization of the scientific performance in Mexico (1995–2015). Scientometrics128(3): 1785–1799.
32.
GarfieldE (1955) Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science122(3159): 108–111.
33.
HambrickDCChenM-J (2008) New academic fields as admittance-seeking social movements: The case of strategic management. Academy of Management Review33(1): 32–54.
34.
HammadWAl-AniW (2021) Building educational research capacity: Challenges and opportunities from the perspectives of faculty members at a national university in Oman. SAGE Open11(3): 21582440211032668.
35.
HarrisonPW (1928) The heart of our message. The Muslim World18(2): 155–158.
36.
HarrisonPW (1939) After madras the days ahead for missions to moslems. The Muslim World29(3): 221–228.
37.
Herrera-FrancoGMontalván-BurbanoNMora-FrankC, et al. (2021) Scientific research in Ecuador: A bibliometric analysis. Publications9(4): 55.
38.
HolmbergKParkHW (2018) An altmetric investigation of the online visibility of South Korea-based scientific journals. Scientometrics117: 603–613.
39.
HsuF-CTrappeyAJTrappeyCV, et al. (2006) Technology and knowledge document cluster analysis for enterprise R&D strategic planning. International Journal of Technology Management36(4): 336–353.
40.
Isfandyari-MoghaddamASaberiMKTahmasebi-LimoniS, et al. (2023) Global scientific collaboration: A social network analysis and data mining of the co-authorship networks. Journal of Information Science49(4): 1126–1141.
41.
JameelAAhmadA (2020) Factors Impacting Research Productivity of Academic Staff at the Iraqi Higher Education System. ERN: Microeconometric Studies of Education Markets (Topic). DOI: 10.37134/ibej.vol13.1.9.2020.
42.
KarabchukTShomotovaAChmelK (2022) Paradox of research productivity of higher education institutions in arab gulf countries: The case of the UAE. Higher Education Quarterly76(4): 759–785.
43.
KayacanEYAnavatanA (2022) Investigation of the country-specific factors for URAP. In: Advances in Econometrics, Operational Research, Data Science and Actuarial Studies: Techniques and Theories. Springer, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85254-2_13
44.
KivinenOHedmanJArtukkaK (2017) Scientific publishing and global university rankings. How well are top publishing universities recognized?Scientometrics112: 679–695.
45.
KolluruMSureshV (2024) Decoding Scholarly Publication Dynamism in Oman Using Data Mining Exploration. International Journal of Religion 5(10):2693-2711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61707/7r31ha83.
46.
LiuWTangLGuM, et al. (2015) Feature report on China: A bibliometric analysis of China-related articles. Scientometrics102: 503–517.
47.
Luque-MartínezTLuque-RayaI (2024) Spanish scientific research by field and subject. Strategic analysis with ARWU indicators. Scientometrics129(9): 5265–5285.
48.
MarzoukO (2024) Benchmarks for the omani higher education students-faculty ratio (SFR) based on world bank data, QS rankings, and THE rankings. Cogent Education11(1): 2317117.
NajmiARashidiTHAbbasiA, et al. (2017) Reviewing the transport domain: An evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis. Scientometrics110: 843–865.
53.
NassaAKAroraJ (2021) Revisiting ranking of academic institutions: An overview. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology41(1): 5.
54.
NguyenTVHo-LeTPLeUV (2017) International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: An analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics110: 1035–1051.
55.
OsmanNEMEFadlallaMA (2021) Successful use of knowledge-based systems for collaboration in higher education: University of nizwa, sultan qaboos university as a case study. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO)11(2): 47–58.
56.
OyewolaDODadaEG (2022) Exploring machine learning: A scientometrics approach using bibliometrix and VOSviewer. SN Applied Sciences4(5): 43.
57.
PriemJPiwowarHAHemmingerBM (2012) Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1203.4745.
58.
RisiNA (2021) The Characteristics of Intellectual Output in the Field of Big Data in Oman from 2010 to 2020 : A Bibliometric Study Based on Scopus. 2021 22nd International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT). DOI: 10.1109/acit53391.2021.9677178. 1-12.
59.
SanmorinoAKarimahF (2021) A Review for the Mechanism of Research Productivity Enhancement in the Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Advanced Science Computing and Engineering 3(1):28-39. DOI: 10.30630/ijasce.3.1.43.
60.
ShehattaIMahmoodK (2016) Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: Policy implications. Scientometrics109: 1231–1254.
61.
SolankiTKarmakarMBanshalSK, et al. (2019) Social Media coverage of research output from 100 most productive institutions in India. J. Sci. Res8(3): 143–149.
62.
StevensVSpurlingSLoritzD, et al. (1986) New ideas in software development for linguistics and language learning. CALICO Journal4(1): 15–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24156661.
63.
StormWHHarrisonPW (1934) The arabs of Oman. The Muslim World24(3): 262–270.
64.
SujeeSOthmaniSHDalwaiT (2024) Toward a knowledge-based economy: Empowering higher education in Oman with AI for vision 2040 achievement. In: MansourNBujosa VadellLM (eds) Finance and Law in the Metaverse World: Regulation and Financial Innovation in the Virtual World. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67547-8_12
65.
ThelwallMHausteinSLarivièreV, et al. (2013) Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PloS one8(5): e64841.
66.
Torres-SalinasDRobinson-GarcíaNArroyo-MachadoW (2022) Coverage and distribution of altmetric mentions in Spain: A cross-country comparison in 22 research fields. Profesional de la información31(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.20.
67.
TuestaEFBolaños-PizarroMNevesDP, et al. (2020) Complex networks for benchmarking in global universities rankings. Scientometrics125: 405–425.
68.
Van EckNWaltmanL (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics84(2): 523–538.
69.
VAN PEURSEMG (1919) Village evangelization in Oman. The Muslim World10(1): 68–71.
70.
VAN PEURSEMGD (1921) METHODS OF EVANGELISM IN ARABIA. The Muslim World11(3): 267–271.
WangR-JShihY-H (2023) What are universities pursuing? A review of the Quacquarelli Symonds world university rankings of Taiwanese universities (2021–2023). Frontiers in Education 8:1185817. Frontiers Media SA1185817. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1185817.
73.
YangSZhengMYuY, et al. (2021) Are altmetric. Com scores effective for research impact evaluation in the social sciences and humanities?Journal of Informetrics15(1): 101120.
74.
ZahediZCostasRWoutersP (2014) How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics101: 1491–1513.
