The rapid advancement of digital technologies has transformed the societies worldwide, yet not every section of society has benefited equally; women are in more disadvantageous position to become a part of digital inclusion. This study aims to analyse the gender digital divide through power cube framework by reviewing the existing literature within the field. It analyses how different levels of power influence the presence of women in digital spaces. The study is conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework. The review was conducted using the Scopus, Science Direct and Web of Science databases. Applying the Powercube framework illustrates how gender inequality exists in digital spaces, and these digital inequalities do not take place in isolation; they are result of power imbalances at different levels and spaces. This power analysis not only highlights the challenges but also points toward pathways for empowering women and bridging the digital divide. This study contributes to the existing literature on the gender digital divide by adding a new dimension of power analysis by providing a multidimensional perspective on the digital gender divide.
Abu-ShanabEAl-JamalN (2015) Exploring the gender digital divide in Jordan. Gender, Technology and Development19(1): 91–113.
2.
AcilarASæbøØ (2023) Towards understanding the gender digital divide: A systematic literature review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication72(3): 233–249.
3.
AfianiI (2018) Advancing women’s digital skills and economic empowerment through girls in tech Indonesia: A case study. Salasika1(1): 21–32.
4.
Ancheta-ArrabalAPulido-MontesCCarvajal-MardonesV (2021) Gender digital divide and education in Latin America: A literature review. Education Sciences11(12): 804.
5.
AntonioATuffleyD (2014) The gender digital divide in developing countries. Future Internet6(4): 673–687.
6.
BalaSSinghalP (2018) Gender digital divide in India: A case of inter-regional analysis of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society16(2): 173–192.
7.
EnehOC (2010) Gender digital divide: Comparative assessment of the information communications technologies and literacy levels of students in Nigeria. Information Technology Journal9(8): 1739–1746.
8.
FatehkiaMKashyapRWeberI (2018) Using Facebook ad data to track the global digital gender gap. World Development107: 189–209.
9.
FitzsimonsA (2012) Women Power and Technology: In Knowing the Difference. New York: Routledge, 122–131.
10.
GalperinHArcidiaconoM (2021) Employment and the gender digital divide in Latin America: A decomposition analysis. Telecommunications Policy45(7): 102–166.
11.
Gargallo-CastelAEsteban-SalvadorLPerez-SanzJ (2010) Impact of gender in adopting and using ICTs in Spain. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation5(3): 120–128.
12.
GaventaJ (2005) Reflections on the uses of the ‘power cube’approach for analysing the spaces, places and dynamics of civil society participation and engagement. Prepared for Dutch CFA Evaluation ‘Assessing Civil Society Participation as Supported In-Country by Cordaid, Hivos, Novib and Plan Netherlands. Report.
13.
GillwaldAGovan-VassenNAdamsR, et al. (2022) Digital new deal for Africa: governance in the age of digitalisation and datafication. Research ICT Africa. Report.
GrayTJGainousJWagnerKM (2017) Gender and the digital divide in Latin America. Social Science Quarterly98(1): 326–340.
16.
HafkinNTaggartN (2001) Gender information technology and developing countries. Washington, DC, Estados Unidos: Academy for Educational Development.
17.
HarawayD (2013) Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective In Women, Science, and Technology. Routledge, 455–472.
18.
HilbertM (2011) Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Women’s Studies International Forum34(6): 479–489.
19.
HoffmannCPLutzC (2021) Digital divides in political participation: The mediating role of social media self-efficacy and privacy concerns. Policy and Internet13(1): 6–29.
20.
JiangWJLuhYH (2017) Gender digital divide in a patriarchal society: What can we learn from blinder–Oaxaca decomposition. Quality and Quantity51(6): 2555–2576.
21.
KeatingCVan AudenhoveLCraffertL (2022) Social support for digital inclusion of women in South African townships. Telematics and Informatics75: 101893.
22.
KerrasHBautistaSPiñeros PereaDS, et al. (2022) Closing the digital gender gap among foreign university students: The challenges ahead. Sustainability14(19): 12230.
23.
LimKNamYOEomS (2020) Structural gender differences in LMS use patterns among college students. Sustainability12(11): 4465.
24.
LiuHY (2018) The power structure of artificial intelligence. Law, Innovation and Technology10(2): 197–229.
25.
LubnaTBhowmikSAshrafS (2018) Factors influencing women’s access of mobile financial services: An empirical study on Sylhet region. European Journal of Business and Management10(8): 33–40.
26.
MillerBPShrumW (2011) The gender digital divide in the research sectors of Ghana, Kenya, and Kerala: Are women more connected over time?Gender, Technology and Development15(1): 25–52.
27.
MumporezeNPrielerM (2017) Gender digital divide in Rwanda: A qualitative analysis of socio-economic factors. Telematics and Informatics34(7): 1285–1293.
28.
Novo-CortiIVarela-CandamioLGarcia-AlvarezMT (2014) Breaking the walls of social exclusion of women rural by means of ICTs: The case of ‘digital divides’ in Galician. Computers in Human Behavior30: 497–507.
29.
NussbaumMC (2000) Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
OECD (2018) Bridging the digital gender divide: include, upskill, innovate. Available at: www.oecd. org/digital/bridging-the-digital-gender-divide.pdf.
32.
Ortiz CoboMJeri LevanoRI (2023) Gender digital divide in migratory contexts: The case of Peruvian migrant women in Italy and Spain. Journal of Education Culture and Society14(1): 575–596.
33.
PageMJMckenzieJEBossuytPM, et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ372: 12.
34.
PantazidouM (2012) What Next for Power Analysis? A Review of Recent Experience with the Powercube and Related Frameworks. IDS Working Papers: 2012(400), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00400.x.
35.
Peláez-SánchezICGlasserman-MoralesLD (2023) Gender digital divide and women's digital inclusion: A systematic mapping. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies12(3): 258–282.
36.
PotnisD (2016) Culture’s consequences: Economic barriers to owning mobile phones experienced by women in India. Telematics and Informatics33(2): 356–369.
37.
PrietoJSTorresJMTGarciaMG (2020) Gender and digital teaching competence in dual vocational education and training. Education Sciences10(3): 84.
38.
SahaSRZamanMO (2017) Gender digital divide in higher education: A study on university of Barisal, Bangladesh. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science22(1): 17.
39.
ScheerderADeursenAvDijkJv (2017) Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics34(8): 1607–1624.
40.
SenA (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
SrinuanCBohlinE (2011) Understanding the digital divide: A literature survey and ways forward.
42.
SuwanaFLily (2017) Empowering Indonesian women through building digital media literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences38(3): 212–217.
43.
TewathiaNKamathAIlavarasanPV (2020) Social inequalities, fundamental inequities, and recurring of the digital divide: Insights from India. Technology in Society61: 101251.
44.
TsuriaR (2020) Digital divide in light of religion, gender, and women’s digital participation. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society18(3): 405–413.
45.
Van DijkJ (2008) The digital divide in Europe. In: The Handbook of Internet Politics. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
Van DijkJ (2020) The digital divide. Cambridge, UK, p. 208.
47.
WajcmanJ (2007) From women and technology to gendered technoscience. Information, Community and Society10(3): 287–298.
48.
WangJLinPC (2024) Spatial spillover of the global internet penetration rate and the digital gender divide. Sage Open14(2): 21582440241255448.
49.
ZilianSSZilianLS (2020) Digital inequality in Austria: Empirical evidence from the survey of the OECD “Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies”. Technology in Society63: 101397.
