Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Investigating the factors influencing the adoption and use of artificial intelligence applications among Pakistani university research scholars: An empirical study
The widespread use and adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications among university students has drastically transformed the educational landscape. Recognizing the importance of this transformation, this study aims to investigate the factors affecting the adoption and use of AI applications among Pakistani research scholars. This study used an extended version of the unified theory of acceptance and use of the technology model and innovative resistance theory. The data were collected from 235 research scholars through a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and a multiple linear regression test were used to analyze the collected data. The study found that Pakistani research scholars used various AI applications for research purposes such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, ChatPDF, and SciSpace. This study found that personal innovativeness, performance expectancy, social influence, and trust significantly influence research scholars’ behavioral intention to use AI applications. In contrast, the impact of effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, and resistance to innovation on students’ behavioral intention to use AI tools was statistically insignificant. The findings offer actionable insights for educators, policymakers, and technology developers aiming to enhance AI adoption in higher education.
AgarwalRPrasadJ (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research9(2): 204–215.
2.
AhmedRMallahIAShaheenA (2024) Learning experiences and practices through artificial intelligence as adoptive academia for teachers and students of higher education institutions of Pakistan. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review8(1): 406–417.
3.
AlamA (2021) Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. In: 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA). New York, USA: IEEE, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICA52458.2021.9697272
4.
AlGerafiMAZhouYAlfaddaH, et al. (2023) Understanding the factors influencing higher education students’ intention to adopt artificial intelligence-based robots. IEEE Access11: 99752–99764.
5.
AliHSharifMYasminM, et al. (2020) A survey of feature extraction and fusion of deep learning for detection of abnormalities in video endoscopy of gastrointestinal-tract. Artificial Intelligence Review53: 2635–2707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09743-2
6.
Al ShamsiJHAl EmranMShaalanK (2022) Understanding key drivers affecting students’ use of artificial intelligence-based voice assistants. Education and Information Technologies27(6): 8071–8091.
7.
AlyoussefIY (2021) Factors influencing students’ acceptance of M-learning in higher education: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Electronics10(24): 3171.
8.
AlzahraniL (2023) Analyzing students’ attitudes and behavior toward artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)11(6): 65–73.
9.
AmoozadehMDanielsDNamD, et al. (2024) Trust in generative AI among students: An exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. New York, USA: ACM, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630842
10.
AndrewsJEWardHYoonJ (2021) UTAUT As a model for understanding intention to adopt AI and related technologies among librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship47(6): 102437.
11.
AsemiAKoANowkariziM (2020) Intelligent libraries: A review on expert systems, artificial intelligence, and robots. Library Hi Tech39(2): 412–434.
12.
AsimMArifMRafiqM, et al. (2023) Investigating applications of artificial intelligence in university libraries of Pakistan: An empirical study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship49(6): 102803.
13.
BrandhoferGTenglerK (2024) Acceptance of artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities, concerns, and need for action. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research4(2): 1105–1113.
14.
ChatterjeeSBhattacharjeeKK (2020) Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies25: 3443–3463.
ChenSCPamungkasRSSchmidtD (2024) The role of machine learning in improving robotic perception and decision making. International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence3(1): 32–43.
17.
ChenXXieHZouD, et al. (2020b) Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence1: 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
18.
ChinJHKimMJ (2017) A study on the effect on consumer’s innovation, trust on sport wearable products: Focused on extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Korean Tourism and Leisure Research29(7): 425–442.
19.
ChukhlominV (2024) Exploring the use of custom GPTs in higher education strategic planning: A preliminary field report. Available at SSRN 4793697.
20.
ClaudyMCGarciaRO’DriscollA (2015) Consumer resistance to innovation-a behavioral reasoning perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43: 528–544.
21.
CreswellJWCreswellJD (2017) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
22.
DegadwalaSVyasD (2024) Survey on systematic analysis of deep learning models compare to machine learning. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology10(3): 556–566.
23.
DeviABarooahPKAhmedZ (2024) Enhancing literature review through AI-based research tools: A comparative study of SciSpace and semantic scholar. TIJER–International Research Journal11(7): 779–785.
24.
DubeARAmbroseAJHVelezG, et al. (2025) Real concerns, artificial intelligence: Reality testing for psychiatrists. International Review of Psychiatry37(1): 33–38.
25.
ElshaerIAHasaneinAMSobaihAEE (2024) The moderating effects of gender and study discipline in the relationship between university students’ acceptance and use of ChatGPT. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education14(7): 1981–1995.
26.
EmonMMHHassanFNahidMH, et al. (2023) Predicting adoption intention of artificial intelligence. AIUB Journal of Science and Engineering (AJSE)22(2): 189–199.
27.
FieldA (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th edn.London: Sage Publications.
28.
GainARaoMBhatSK (2019) Usage of grammarly–online grammar and spelling checker tool at the health sciences library, Manipal academy of higher education, Manipal: A study. Library Philosophy and Practice: 1–13.
29.
García de Blanes SebastiánMSarmiento GuedeJRAntonovicaA (2022) Application and extension of the UTAUT2 model for determining behavioral intention factors in use of the artificial intelligence virtual assistants. Frontiers in Psychology13: 993935.
30.
GurralaKRChoudharyS (2024, July) Analysis of industry 4.0 barriers: A fuzzy DEMANTEL approach. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Industry 4.0, Artificial Intelligence, and Communications Technology (IAICT). New York, USA: IEEE, 266–272.
31.
HatemGZeidanJGoossensM, et al. (2022) Normality testing methods and the importance of skewness and kurtosis in statistical analysis. BAU Journal-Science and Technology3(2): 1–5.
32.
HookerCMZúñigaHG (2017) Survey methods, online. In: The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–7.
33.
IvanovSSolimanMTuomiA, et al. (2024) Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the theory of planned behaviour. Technology in Society77: 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521
34.
JangWChangYKimB, et al. (2024) Influence of personal innovativeness and different sequences of data presentation on evaluations of explainable artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction40(16): 4215–4226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2209995
35.
JowarderMI (2023) The influence of ChatGPT on social science students: Insights drawn from undergraduate students in the United States. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS)3(2): 194–200.
36.
KaloloJF (2019) Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies24: 345–358.
37.
KandothSShekharSK (2022, September) Social influence and intention to use AI: The role of personal innovativeness and perceived trust using the parallel mediation model. In: Forum Scientiae Oeconomia10(3): 131–150.
38.
KarmakarSDasT (2024) Effect of artificial intelligence on education. In: Optimization and Computing Using Intelligent Data-Driven Approaches for Decision-Making. 198–211. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003536796-8
39.
KimSLeeJ (2021) Structural relationships among factors influencing elementary school teachers’ acceptance of learning with AI. The Journal27(4): 1325–1351.
40.
KimYJChoiJHFotsoGMN (2024) Medical professionals’ adoption of AI-based medical devices: UTAUT model with trust mediation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity10(1): 100220.
41.
KizilcecRF (2024) To advance AI use in education, focus on understanding educators. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education34(1): 12–19.
42.
KlineRB (2023) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Publications.
43.
LabragueLJAguilar RosalesRYboaBC, et al. (2023) Factors influencing student nurses’ readiness to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in their studies and their perceived barriers to accessing AI technology: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today130: 105945.
44.
LeeKYSheehanLLeeK, et al. (2021) The continuation and recommendation intention of artificial intelligence-based voice assistant systems (AIVAS): The influence of personal traits. Internet Research31(5): 1899–1939.
45.
LinHCHoCFYangH (2022) Understanding adoption of artificial intelligence-enabled language e-learning system: An empirical study of UTAUT model. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation16(1): 74–94.
46.
LinKJChenSZhangK, et al. (2025) Technology evaluation: A systematic review and implications for ethical technology management in tourism and hospitality. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research30(2): 194–210.
47.
LiuYParkJMcMinnS (2024) Using generative artificial intelligence/ChatGPT for academic communication: Students’ perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics34(4): 1437–1461.
48.
LundBDOmameITijaniS, et al. (2020) Perceptions toward artificial intelligence among academic library employees and alignment with the diffusion of innovations’ adopter categories. College & Research Libraries81(5): 65.
49.
MahmudiAAFionasariRMardikawatiB, et al. (2023) Integration of artificial intelligence technology in distance learning in higher education. Journal of Social Science Utilizing Technology1(4): 190–201.
50.
MayerRCDavisJHSchoormanFD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
51.
MhlangaD (2022) Human-centered artificial intelligence: The superlative approach to achieve sustainable development goals in the fourth industrial revolution. Sustainability14(13): 7804.
52.
MikalefPGuptaM (2021) Artificial Intelligence Capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management 58(3): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
53.
Mohd RahimNIIahadNAYusofAF, et al. (2022) AI-Based chatbots adoption model for higher-education institutions: A hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Sustainability14(19): 12726.
54.
NarayananNArjunKP (2024) Introduction to deep learning. In: Artificial Intelligence for Precision Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Auerbach Publications, 32–60.
55.
NathalieJJacquelineGYusufNA, et al. (2024) Optimizing digital business processes through artificial intelligence: A case study in e-commerce systems. ADI Journal on Recent Innovation6(1): 89–98.
56.
O'NeillRRussellAM (2019) Grammarly: Help or hindrance? Academic learning advisors’ perceptions of an online grammar checker. Journal of Academic Language and Learning13(1): A88–A107.
57.
PandaS (2023) Enhancing PDF interaction for a more engaging user experience in library: Introducing ChatPDF. IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology8(1): 20–25.
58.
PeslakAKovalchickL (2024) AI For coders: An analysis of the usage of ChatGPT and GitHub CoPilot. Issues in Information Systems25(4): 252–260.
59.
PolyportisAPahosN (2024) Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: The role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy. Behaviour & Information Technology44(2): 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2317364
60.
QuanYHuiB (2024) Study screening for meta-research: An overview of AI tools. In: Routledge Handbook of Technological Advances in Researching Language Learning. London, UK: Routledge, 433–447.
61.
RaffaghelliJERodríguezMEGuerrero-RoldánAE, et al. (2022) Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of an early warning system in higher education. Computers & Education182: 104468.
62.
RaghebMATantawiPFaroukN, et al. (2022) Investigating the acceptance of applying chat-bot (artificial intelligence) technology among higher education students in Egypt. International Journal of Higher Education Management8(2). https://doi.org/10.24052/IJHEM/V08N02/ART-1.
63.
RamSShethJN (1989) Consumer resistance to innovations: The marketing problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing6(2): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542
64.
RoyRBabakerkhellMDMukherjeeS, et al. (2022) Evaluating the intention for the adoption of artificial intelligence-based robots in the university to educate the students. IEEE Access10: 125666–125678. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3225555
65.
ShwedehFSalloumSAAburayyaA, et al. (2024) AI Adoption and educational sustainability in higher education in the UAE. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Power and Dangers of ChatGPT in the Classroom. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_14.
66.
SuhailFAdelMAl-EmranM, et al. (2024) Are students ready for robots in higher education? Examining the adoption of robots by integrating UTAUT2 and TTF using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Technology in Society77: 102524.
67.
SuryadevaraCK (2023) Transforming business operations: Harnessing artificial intelligence and machine learning in the enterprise. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT)5(2): 931–938. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22191653
68.
TabachnickBGFidellLSUllmanJB (2019) Using Multivariate Statistics, 7th ed.Boston, MA, USA: Pearson.
69.
TalwarSTalwarMKaurP, et al. (2021) Why have consumers opposed, postponed, and rejected innovations during a pandemic? A study of mobile payment innovations. Australasian Journal of Information Systems25: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v25i0.2902
70.
ThomsonSRPickard-JonesBABainesS, et al. (2024) The impact of AI on education and careers: What do students think?Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence7: 1457299. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1457299
71.
VelankarMRMahallePNShindeGR (2024) Rethinking machine learning and deep learning. In: Cognitive Computing for Machine Thinking. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 25–41.
72.
VenkateshV (2022) Adoption and use of AI tools: A research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research308(1): 641–652.
73.
VenkateshVDavisFD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science46(2): 186–204.
74.
VenkateshVMorrisMGMDavisGB, et al. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly27(3): 425–478.
75.
VenkateshVThongJYXuX (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly36(1): 157–178.
76.
Von GarrelJMayerJ (2023) Artificial intelligence in studies—Use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(1): –9.
77.
Wamba-TaguimdjeSLWambaSFKamdjougJRK, et al. (2020) Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: The business value of AI-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal26(7): 1893–1924.
78.
WangYLiuCTuYF (2021) Factors affecting the adoption of AI-based applications in higher education. Educational Technology & Society24(3): 116–129.
79.
WhitfieldSHofmannMA (2023) Elicit: AI literature review research assistant. Public Services Quarterly19(3): 201–207.
80.
WuWZhangBLiS, et al. (2022) Exploring factors of the willingness to accept AI-assisted learning environments: An empirical investigation based on the UTAUT model and perceived risk theory. Frontiers in Psychology13: 870777.
81.
YakubuMNDasukiSI (2019) Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning technologies among higher education students in Nigeria: A structural equation modelling approach. Information Development35(3): 492–502.
82.
YangZ (2024) Deep learning applications in natural language processing and optimization strategies. Journal of Modern Education and Culture1(2). https://doi.org/10.70767/jmec.v1i2.257
83.
ZhangCZhangCLiC, et al. (2023) One small step for generative AI, one giant leap for AGI: A complete survey on ChatGPT in the AIGC era. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2304.06488. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24789.70883.
84.
ZhangXWareewanichT (2024) A study of the factors influencing teachers’ willingness to use generative artificial intelligence based on the UTAUT model. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies18(6). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i06.47991.
