This study aims to assess the interoperability of Indonesian government organizations in implementing COVID-19 data integration. The COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for fast, accurate, and effective data transmission to control the COVID-19 outbreak in Indonesia. This study uses the Qualitative Data Software Analysis (QDSA) approach with the help of the Nvivo data analysis software. Secondary data sources are placed as primary data with the consideration of valid data with transparent sources. This study utilizes big data as primary data, with structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data properties. Structured data collection through the official website portal of the Central Government and Provincial Government and the COVID-19 Task Force Report Document. Unstructured data is mined from information on National Mass Media articles, which are limited by the period and topic of the problem. The study results show that identification related to data management and surveillance of COVID-19 data in Indonesia in recording and reporting COVID-19 cases is computerized through online applications. The TC-All Record 19 application is part of a strategy to improve the integration of collaborative data sharing between organizations. However, an excellent organizational interoperability maturity does not support the implementation of data sharing. This condition can be seen from data transmission between the central government and regional governments, which have a high gap in the quality of COVID-19 data surveillance. Organizational interoperability is assessed using Business Processes, Policies, Governance, Architecture, Economics, and Regulations/Laws.
ArnoldusJ, et al. (2013) Energy-efficiency indicators for e-services. In: 2013 2nd International Workshop on Green and Sustainable Software, GREENS 2013, Software Improvement Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp.24–29: IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/GREENS.2013.6606418.
2.
As’adAM, et al. (2016) Importance of service integration in e-government implementations. In: 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems, ICICS 2016, Cultural Communication and Computing Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom, pp.56–61: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IACS.2016.7476086.
3.
AxelssonKMelinULindgrenI (2010) Exploring the importance of citizen participation and involvement in e-government projects: Practice, incentives, and organisation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy4(4): 299–321. Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
4.
BalasubramanianD, et al. (2017) Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis in diverse host environments. Pathogens and Disease75(1): ftx005. Oxford University Press.
5.
BarsasellaDImanATFadlyF, et al. (2022) Information flow and data gaps in COVID-19 recording and reporting at national and provincial levels in Indonesia. Healthcare10(2): 204. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
6.
BatesDWSamalL (2018) Interoperability: What is it, how can we make it work for clinicians, and how should we measure it in the future?Health Services Research53(5): 3270. Health Research & Educational Trust.
7.
BauerDC, et al. (2021) Interoperable medical data: The missing link for understanding COVID-19. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases68(4): 1753–1760. Wiley Online Library.
8.
BayagaAOphoffJ (2019) Determinants of E-Government Use in Developing Countries: The Influence of Privacy and Security Concerns. In: 2nd International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications, NextComp 2019, Department of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, University of Zululand, South Africa: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/NEXTCOMP.2019.8883653.
9.
BititciUSBourneMCrossJAF, et al. (2018) Editorial: Towards a theoretical foundation for performance measurement and management. International Journal of Management Reviews20(3): 653–660.
10.
BoulosL, et al. (2023) Effectiveness of face masks for reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid systematic review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A381(2257): 20230133. The Royal Society.
11.
BrandãoC (2015) P. Bazeley and K. Jackson, qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Qualitative Research in Psychology12(4): 492–494. Routledge.
12.
BrouwerPJM, et al. (2020) Potent neutralising antibodies from COVID-19 patients define multiple targets of vulnerability. Science369(6504): 643–650. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
13.
BuckJJH, et al. (2019) Ocean data product integration through innovation-the next level of data interoperability. Frontiers in Marine Science6: 32. Frontiers Media SA.
14.
ByrneLRoennfeldtHWolfJ, et al. (2022) Effective peer employment within multidisciplinary organizations: Model for best practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research49: 283–297.
15.
CandidoDS, et al. (2020) Evolution and epidemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil. Science369(6508): 1255–1260. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
16.
ChenP, et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody LY-CoV555 in outpatients with COVID-19. New England Journal of Medicine384(3): 229–237. Mass Medical Soc.
17.
Chiwona-KarltunL, et al. (2021) ‘COVID-19: From health crises to food security anxiety and policy implications. Ambio50(4): 794–811. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7012, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden: Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
18.
ClémentRNortonB (2021) Ethnolinguistic vitality, identity, and power: Investment in SLA. Journal of Language and Social Psychology40(1): 154–171. University of OttawaON, Canada: SAGE Publications Inc.
19.
ColeARioufreytT (2021) Inquiry on territorial governance in Brittany and Wales: Reanalysis of qualitative data using CAQDAS in a comparative setting. Qualitative Research21(4): 586–602. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
20.
CraswellAMoxhamLBroadbentM (2014) Shared responsibility for electronic records: Governance in perinatal data entry. In: Investing in E-Health: People, Knowledge, and Technology for a Healthy Future. IOS Press, 19–24.
21.
DixonBERahurkarSApathyNC (2020) Interoperability and health information exchange for public health. In: Informatics and Information Systems. Switzerland: Springer, 307–324.
22.
DixonBERahurkarSHoY, et al. (2019) Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: A systematic review. BMJ Health & Care Informatics26(1): e100074. BMJ Publishing Group.
23.
DuLRaposoVLWangM (2020) ‘COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A technologic Tower of Babel and the gap for international pandemic control. JMIR mHealth and EHealth8(11): e23194. JMIR Publications Inc., Toronto, Canada.
24.
Edwards-JonesA (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis with NVIVO. Taylor & Francis.
ElebesunuEE, et al. (2021) COVID-19 calls for health systems strengthening in Africa: A case of Nigeria. International Journal of Health Planning and Management36(6): 2035–2043. Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
27.
FeenstraRWJanssenMWagenaarRW (2006) Designing a service composition framework to support multi actor-network. In: Proceedings of Euro mGov, pp.103–112: Citeseer.
28.
FocosiDTuccoriMBajA, et al. (2021) Sars-cov-2 variants: A synopsis of in vitro efficacy data of convalescent plasma, currently marketed vaccines, and monoclonal antibodies’. Viruses13(7): 1211. North-Western Tuscany Blood Bank, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paraisa 2, Pisa, 56124, Italy: MDPI AG.
29.
ForsterJStrengARudolphP, et al. (2022) Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 surveillance testing among children and childcare workers at German day care centers: A nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Network Open5(1): e2142057. Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 2, E1, Wurzburg, D-97080, Germany: American Medical Association.
30.
GardnerJHerronDMcNallyN, et al. (2023) Advancing the digital and computational capabilities of healthcare providers: A qualitative study of a hospital organisation in the NHS. Digital Health9: 20552076231186510.
31.
Gil-GarciaJR, et al. (2019) Characterizing the importance of clarifying roles and responsibilities in government inter-organizational collaboration and information sharing initiatives. Government Information Quarterly36(4): 101393. Elsevier.
32.
GohCE, et al. (2022) ‘When e-learning takes centre stage amid COVID-19: Dental educators’ perspectives and their future impacts’. European Journal of Dental Education26(3): 506–515. Wiley Online Library.
33.
GoldkuhlG (2008a) The challenges of Interoperability in E-government: Towards a conceptual refinement. In: Proceedings pre-ICIS 2008 SIG eGovernment Workshop, Citeseer.
34.
GoldkuhlG (2008b) What kind of pragmatism in information systems research. In: AIS SIG Prag Inaugural meeting, Dec, pp.3–8.
35.
GürdürDAsplundF (2018) A systematic review to merge discourses: Interoperability, integration, and cyber-physical systems. Journal of Industrial Information Integration9: 14–23. Elsevier.
36.
Gürdür BrooD, et al. (2021) Built environment of Britain in 2040: Scenarios and strategies. Sustainable Cities and Society65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102645. Centre for Smart Infrastructure and Construction, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, United Kingdom: Elsevier Ltd.
37.
HaltofováB (2020) Critical success factors of crowdsourcing use in e-government: A case study from the Czech Republic. Urban Research and Practice13(4): 434–451. Department of Management and Marketing, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, Czech Republic: Routledge.
38.
HuangC, et al. (2020) Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet395(10223): 497–506. Elsevier.
39.
IbrahimIM, et al. (2020) COVID-19 spike-host cell receptor GRP78 binding site prediction. Journal of Infection80(5): 554–562. Elsevier.
40.
IbrahimNK (2020) Epidemiologic surveillance for controlling COVID-19 pandemic: Types, challenges and implications. Journal of Infection and Public Health13(11): 1630–1638.
41.
IDABCEIndustryDG (2004) European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European e-Government Services. European Communities.
42.
IslamSRayhanAIMajumderTH (2022) Behavioral factors underlying energy consumption pattern: A cross-sectional study on the industrial sector of Bangladesh. Heliyon8(11): e11523.
43.
IslamSMD-U, et al. (2020) Exploring COVID-19 stress and its factors in Bangladesh: A perception-based study. Heliyon6(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04399. Department of Environmental Sciences, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh: Elsevier Ltd.
44.
IttefaqMKambohSA (2022) COVID-19 and national images: The case of #ResignModi. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy18(1): 15–17.
45.
JansenDJonkmanAHVriesHJ, et al. (2021) Positive end-expiratory pressure affects geometry and function of the human diaphragm. Journal of Applied Physiology131(4): 1328–1339. American Physiological Society Rockville, MD.
46.
JanssenMJohaA (2007) Understanding IT governance for the operation of shared services in public service networks. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations. Inderscience Publishers4(1): 20–34.
47.
JanssenMSchollHJ (2007) Interoperability for electronic governance. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp.45–48.
48.
JiménezCESolanasAFalconeF (2014) E-government interoperability: Linking open and smart government. Computer47(10): 22–24. IEEE.
49.
KabbaKZA (2017) ‘Clinical validation of an assay for type 1 interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus’. University of Leeds.
50.
KamalSAShafiqMKakriaP (2020) Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society60: 101212. Elsevier.
51.
KandelN, et al. (2020) Health security capacities in the context of COVID-19 outbreak: An analysis of international health regulations annual report data from 182 countries. The Lancet395(10229): 1047–1053. Elsevier.
52.
KhisroJSundbergH (2020) Enterprise interoperability development in multi-relation collaborations: Success factors from the Danish electricity market. Enterprise Information Systems14(8): 1172–1193. Taylor & Francis.
53.
KlischewskiR (2003) Semantic web for e-government. In: International Conference on Electronic Government, pp.288–295: Springer.
54.
KubicekHCimanderR (2009) Three dimensions of organisational interoperability. European Journal of EPractice6: 1–12.
55.
KumarR, et al. (2020) An examination of the e-government service value chain. Information Technology and People34(3): 889–911. Indian Institute of Management Kashipur, Kashipur, India: Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.
56.
LeeCHChenCW (2021) Impulse buying behaviours in live streaming commerce based on the stimulus-organism-response framework. Information (Switzerland)12(6): 1–17.
57.
LegnerCLebreton, BaptistLegnerC, et al. (2007) Preface to the focus theme section:‘business interoperability’business interoperability research: Present achievements and upcoming challenges. Electronic Markets17(3): 176–186. Taylor & Francis.
58.
LiE, et al. (2022a) The impact of electronic health record interoperability on safety and quality of care in high-income countries: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research24(9): e38144. JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada.
59.
LiX, et al. (2021) Emerging geo-data sources to reveal human mobility dynamics during COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and challenges. Computational Urban Science1(1): 22.
60.
LiY, et al. (2022b) The value of health information technology interoperability: Evidence from the interhospital transfer of heart attack patients. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(2): 827–845. INFORMS.
61.
LiYH, et al. (2018) Therapeutic target database update 2018: Enriched resource for facilitating bench-to-clinic research of targeted therapeutics. Nucleic Acids Research46(D1): D1121–D1127. Oxford University Press.
62.
LinerBFaridAM (2015) Extending the utility analysis and integration model at the energy-water nexus. In: 1st IEEE International Smart Cities Conference, ISC2 2015, Water Science and Engineering, Center Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, United States: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC2.2015.7366173.
63.
LiuL, et al. (2020) A framework to evaluate the interoperability of information systems–measuring the maturity of the business process alignment. International Journal of Information Management54: 102153. Elsevier.
64.
MaheshwariDJanssenM (2012) Measuring organisational interoperability in practice: The case study of population welfare department of the government of Sindh, Pakistan. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp.216–225.
65.
MaheshwariDJanssenM (2014) Reconceptualizing measuring, benchmarking for improving interoperability in smart ecosystems: The effect of ubiquitous data and crowdsourcing. Government Information Quarterly31: S84–S92. Elsevier.
66.
McBrideK, et al. (2018) Leader in e-government, laggard in open data: Exploring the case of Estonia. Revue Francaise d’Administration Publique167(3): 613–625. Tallinn University of Technology, Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance, Estonia: Ecole Nationale d’Administration.
67.
McClellanMMostashariFBarkerT (2020) Health Care Payment To Support COVID-19 Detection And Containment. Health Care.
68.
McNallyEM, et al. (2021) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular science: Anticipating problems and potential solutions: A presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation144(23): E461–E471.
69.
MehmoodW, et al. (2022) Requirement design for software configuration and system modeling. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing32(1): 441–454.
70.
MoemenYSEl-SayedIE-T (2021) Environmental challenges and the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare sector: The adoption of intelligent solutions. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control: 41–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72933-2_3. Clinical Pathology Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH.
71.
MoemenYSEl-SayedIE-TDarwishA (2021) Lifestyle, weather, smart technologies. In: The Global Environmental Effects During and Beyond COVID-19: Intelligent Computing Solutions369. Springer Nature, 137.
72.
MurphyJ (2015) Creating communities of professionalism: Addressing cultural and structural barriers. Journal of Educational Administration53(2): 154–176. Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
73.
MurthyBP, et al. (2021) Disparities in COVID-19 vaccination coverage between urban and rural counties — United States, December 14, 2020–April 10, 2021. MMWR Recommendations and Reports70(20): 759–764. Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
74.
NabbenKPobletMGardner-StephenP (2020) The Four Internets of COVID-19: The digital-political responses to COVID-19 and what this means for the post-crisis Internet. In: 10th Annual IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, GHTC 2020, RMIT University, School of Media and Communication, Melbourne, Australia: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC46280.2020.9342859.
75.
NaudéWVinuesaR (2021) Data deprivations, data gaps and digital divides: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Big Data & Society8(2): 20539517211025544. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
76.
NaudetY, et al. (2010) Towards a systemic formalisation of interoperability. Computers in Industry61(2): 176–185. Elsevier.
77.
NizamuddinMMurtiantoYH (2017) Exploring of multi mathematical representation capability in problem-solving on senior high school students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century75(6): 591. Scientia Socialis Ltd.
78.
Ohno-MachadoL (2020) Use of electronic health records to support a public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: A perspective from fifteen academic medical centers. Innovation15: 16.
79.
OlapaneEC (2021) An in-depth exploration on the praxis of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS). Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies3(11): 57–78.
80.
O’Reilly-ShahVN, et al. (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic highlights shortcomings in US health care informatics infrastructure: A call to action. Anesthesia & Analgesia131(2): 340–344. LWW.
81.
OumkaltoumB (2019) ‘Toward A business intelligence model for challenges of interoperability in gov system: Transparency, scalability and genericity. In: 2019 International Conference on Wireless Technologies, Embedded and Intelligent Systems (WITS), pp.1–6: IEEE.
82.
PapazoglouMPGeorgakopoulosD (2003) Introduction: Service-oriented computing. Communications of the ACM46(10): 24–28. ACM New York, NY, USA.
83.
PardoTABurkeGB (2008) Improving Government Interoperability: A capability framework for government managers. Center for Technology in Government, University of Albany.
84.
PardoTANamTBurkeGB (2012) E-Government interoperability: Interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions. Social Science Computer Review30(1): 7–23.
85.
ParoškiM, et al. (2015) Development of eGovernment services in the autonomous province of vojvodina. Information Technology for Development21(3): 492–510. Department for Technical and Administrative Services of Provincial Authorities, Government of the AP of Vojvodina, Bul. Mihajla Pupina 16, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia: Routledge.
86.
PatelMK, et al. (2021) Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization. Vaccine39(30): 4013–4024. World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland: Elsevier Ltd.
87.
PayerleG, et al. (2015) Report to congress on server and data centre energy efficiency public law 109-431. public law 109. Ann TourRes3: 45.
88.
PengYLiCRongY, et al. (2021) Real-time prediction of the daily incidence of COVID-19 in 215 countries and territories using machine learning: Model development and validation. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(6): e24285. School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou, China: JMIR Publications Inc..
89.
PurwataTE, et al. (2022) Characteristics of pain and comorbidities in geriatric subjects in Indonesia: A hospital-based national clinical survey. Romanian Journal of Neurology21(2): 158.
90.
ReichwaldRWigandRT (2008) Information, organization and management. Springer Science & Business Media.
91.
RenXWenWFanX, et al. (2021) COVID-19 immune features revealed by a large-scale single-cell transcriptome atlas. Cell184(7): 1895–1913.e19. Elsevier.
92.
RomanelloM, et al. (2021) The 2021 report of the lancet countdown on health and climate change: Code red for a healthy future. The Lancet398(10311): 1619–1662. Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK, United Kingdom: Elsevier B.V.
93.
SandersJM, et al. (2020) Pharmacologic treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A review. Jama323(18): 1824–1836. American Medical Association.
94.
SantosEMdReinhardN (2012) Electronic government interoperability: Identifying the barriers for frameworks adoption. Social Science Computer Review30(1): 71–82. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
95.
SarantisDCharalabidisYPsarrasJ (2008) Towards standardising interoperability levels for information systems of public administrations. The Electronic Journal for E-Commerce Tools & Applications (eJETA) Special Issue on Interoperability for Enterprises and Administrations Worldwide2: 1–15. Citeseer.
96.
ShafiqM, et al. (2020a) Selection of effective machine learning algorithm and Bot-IoT attacks traffic identification for the internet of things in the smart city. Future Generation Computer Systems107: 433–442. Elsevier.
97.
ShafiqSISaninCSzczerbickiE (2020b) Knowledge-based virtual modelling and simulation of manufacturing processes for Industry 4.0. Cybernetics and Systems51(2): 84–102. Taylor & Francis.
98.
ShahN, et al. (2019) Healthy lifestyle as a preventive measure against victimisation among school-going adolescents. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal25(9): 604–612. Dow University of Health Sciences, Pakistan: World Health Organization.
99.
ShanbehzadehMKazemi-ArpanahiHMazhab-JafariK, et al. (2020) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance system: Development of COVID-19 minimum data set and interoperable reporting framework. Journal of Education and Health Promotion9: 203. Wolters Kluwer–Medknow Publications.
100.
ShanbehzadehMNopourRKazemi-ArpanahiH (2022) Designing a standardised framework for data integration between zoonotic diseases systems: Towards one health surveillance. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked30: 100893. Elsevier.
101.
ShanbehzadehM, et al. (2021) Notifiable diseases interoperable framework toward improving Iran public health surveillance system: Lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education and Health Promotion10(1): 179. Medknow Publications.
102.
SharmaAOdaGIcardiM, et al. (2022) Implementation of large-scale laboratory-based detection of COVID-19 in the Veterans Health Administration, March 2020 – February 2021. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease102(3): 115617. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Public Health Surveillance and Research, Palo Alto, CA, United States: Elsevier Inc.
103.
SmithJC, et al. (2020) Cigarette smoke exposure and inflammatory signalling increase the expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in the respiratory tract. Developmental Cell53(5): 514–529. Elsevier.
104.
SobhanifardYSoltanmohammadiB (2021) Effective care training for patients with COVID-19 through the social network. Interactive Learning Environments. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1875003. Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran: Routledge.
105.
Solli-SætherH (2011) A framework for analysing interoperability in electronic government. International Journal of Electronic Finance5(1): 32–48. Department of Leadership and Organizational Management, Norwegian School of Management, Nydalsveien 17, Oslo, NO-0442, Norway: Inderscience Publishers.
106.
StreefkerkHRA, et al. (2020) Electronically assisted surveillance systems of healthcare-associated infections: A systematic review. Eurosurveillance25(2): 1900321. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.
107.
ThomasMAElnagarS (2018) A semantic approach to evaluate web content of government websites. In: Innovative Perspectives on Public Administration in the Digital Age. Virginia Commonwealth University, United States: IGI Global, 1–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5966-5.ch001.
108.
TolkA (2024) Conceptual alignment for simulation interoperability: Lessons learned from 30 years of interoperability research. Simulation100(7): 709–726. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
109.
TolkABairLJDialloSY (2013) Supporting network enabled capability by extending the levels of conceptual interoperability model to an interoperability maturity model. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation10(2): 145–160. Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.
110.
TolkAMaguireJA (2003) The levels of conceptual interoperability model. In: Proceedings of the 2003 fall simulation interoperability workshop, pp.1–11: Citeseer.
111.
TraunmüllerRWimmerMA (2003) E-government at a decisive moment: Sketching a roadmap to excellence. In: International Conference on Electronic Government, pp.1–14: Springer.
112.
TraunmüllerRWimmerM (2004a) E-Government—A roadmap for progress. In: Digital Communities in a Networked Society: e-Commerce, e-Business and e-Government. Springer, 3–12.
113.
TraunmüllerRWimmerM (2004b) E-Government: The challenges ahead. In: International Conference on Electronic Government, pp.1–6: Springer.
114.
WangH, et al. (2020) Phase-adjusted estimation of the number of coronavirus disease 2019 cases in Wuhan, China. Cell Discovery6(1): 10. Nature Publishing Group UK London.
115.
WoodruffRCCampbellAPTaylorCA, et al. (2022) Risk factors for severe COVID-19 in children. Pediatrics149(1): e2021053418. Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network, Division for Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States: American Academy of Pediatrics.
116.
XuL, et al. (2021) Estimating the effect of COVID-19 epidemic on shipping trade: An empirical analysis using panel data. Marine Policy133: 104768. Elsevier.
117.
XuLDXuELLiL (2018) Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research56(8): 2941–2962. Taylor & Francis.
118.
YahayaAS, et al. (2020) Blockchain-based energy trading and load balancing using contract theory and reputation in a smart community. IEEE Access8: 222168–222186.
119.
YangS-BGuyME (2011) The effectiveness of self-managed work teams in government organisations. Journal of Business and Psychology. Springer26: 531–541.
120.
ZhaoD, et al. (2020) A comparative study on the clinical features of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia with other pneumonias. Clinical Infectious Diseases71(15): 756–761. Oxford University Press US.
121.
ZhaoY, et al. (2022) Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease in complex with protease inhibitor PF-07321332. Protein & Cell13(9): 689–693. Springer.
122.
ZhaoZ, et al. (2021) Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 using traditional Chinese medicine: A review. Phytomedicine85: 153308. Elsevier.
