The integration of technology into university libraries is critical for enhancing service delivery, supporting academic excellence, and ensuring relevance in a rapidly advancing digital era. However, organizational resistance remains a significant barrier to effective adoption, particularly in the context of university libraries in Bangladesh. This study aims to examine the key organizational factors that impede technology adoption and assess the role of alignment and support mechanisms in mitigating resistance. Employing a qualitative case study approach, data were collected from library and information science (LIS) professionals at Dhaka University Library through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Thematic analysis revealed key organizational factors influencing resistance, including cultural misalignment, ineffective leadership dynamics, and inadequate support structures. Additionally, findings indicate that strong leadership advocacy, strategic alignment of technological initiatives with institutional goals, and the presence of change advocates significantly reduce resistance and foster a more adaptive organizational environment. The study underscores the importance of fostering a supportive organizational culture and enhancing leadership practices to mitigate resistance and facilitate the adoption of innovative technologies in university libraries. It provides actionable insights for policymakers, higher education authorities, and university administrators to address organizational barriers and cultivate a culture of innovation. Recommendations include targeted capacity-building initiatives, alignment of organizational policies with technological objectives, and increased investment in leadership development programs.
AdarkwaA. B.AbabioA. P.AduseiC. (2024). Assessing The Integration of Information and Communication Technology (IC echnology (ICT) in Libr T) in Library Service Deliv vice Delivery at the Ashanti y at the Ashanti Regional Library. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal).
2.
AdeyoyinS. O. (2006). Managing the Libr Managing the Library’s Corpor s Corporate Cultur ate Culture for Or e for Organizational ganizational Efficiency, Productivity, and Enhanced Service. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal).
3.
AharonyN. (2015). An exploratory study on factors affecting the adoption of cloud computing by information professionals. The Electronic Library, 33(2), 308–323.
4.
AhmedT.HasanN.AkterR. (2023). Journey to Smart Bangladesh: Realities and Challenges. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 3(2), 178–187.
5.
AktarA.IslamM. S. (2024). Moving Towards Digital Trade Transformation in Bangladesh Prospects and Challenges for Implementing Digital Trade. Journal of Business Strategy Finance and Management, 5(2). https://doi.org/DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/JBSFM.05.02.06
6.
AkterR.RathnayakaS.AhmadiZ. (2023). The effect of leadership and organisational culture on organisational innovation. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 28(5/6).
7.
AlagarajaM.ShuckB. (2015). Exploring Organizational Alignment-Employee Engagement Linkages and Impact on Individual Performance: A Conceptual Model. Human Resource Development Review, 14(1), 17 –37. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/1534484314549455
8.
AlamM. J.HassanR.OgawaK. (2023a). Digitalization of higher education to achieve sustainability: Investigating students’ attitudes toward digitalization in Bangladesh. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100273
9.
AlamM. J.HassanR.OgawaK. (2023b). Digitalization of higher education to achieve sustainability: Investigating students’ attitudes toward digitalization in Bangladesh. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5.
10.
AlamM. J.Mezbah-ul-IslamM. (2019). Factors for adoption of OSILS in university libraries of Bangladesh. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 45(2), 127–139.
11.
AlamM. K.TabashM. I.ThakurO. A.RahmanM. M.SiddiquiiM. N.HasanS. (2023). Independence and effectiveness of Shariah department officers to ensure Shariah compliance: evidence from Islamic banks in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(1), 15–26.
12.
AmarantouV.KazakopoulouS.ChatzoudesD.ChatzoglouP. (2018). Resistance to change: an empirical investigation of its antecedents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 426–450.
13.
AnisM. (2024). Teacher Professional Development in the Digital Age: Addressing the Evolving Needs PostCOVID. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(1).
14.
AsemiA.KA.NowkariziM. (2021). Intelligent libraries: a review on expert systems, artificial intelligence, and robot. Library Hi Tech, 39(2), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-02-2020-0038
15.
AtkinsonJ. (2019). Collaboration by academic libraries: What are the benefits, what are the constraints, and what do you need to do to be successful?New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1080/13614533.2019.1575016
16.
AttahR. U.GarbaB. M. P.Gil-OzoudehI.IwuanyanwuO. (2024). Evaluating strategic technology partnerships: Providing conceptual insights into their role in corporate strategy and technological innovation. International Journal of Frontiers in Science and Technology Research, 7(2), 077–089. https://doi.org/10.53294/ijfstr.2024.7.2.0058
17.
BENGTSSONE. (2023). Digital Solutions and Library Outreach: Exploring the use and perceptions of new digital solutions in library outreach activities. University of Boras.
18.
BhartiK. L.VermaS. (2021). Use of Emerging Technologies in the University Libraries: A Study of Review of Literature. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal).
19.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
20.
CanningJ.FoundP. A. (2015). The effect of resistance in organizational change programmes: A study of a lean transformation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2/3), 274–295.
21.
ChinC. J.ZadehA. V. (2024). A Study on the Determinants that Influence Digital Transformation Adoption among Malaysia’s Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4). https://doi.org/DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/23569
22.
ChukwumaN.ZondoR. W. D. (2024). Effect of transformational leadership on employee resistance to change at eThekwini automobiles: a perspective of leaders’ inspirational motivation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 13(3), 179–193.
23.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
24.
DeepG. (2023). Digital transformation’s impact on organizational culture. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 10, 396–401. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2023.10.2.0977
25.
DinS.AliS. F. (2024). New library Technologies and Trends in 2025. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(6).
26.
ElkhdrH. R. H. (2019). The Relationship Between Strategic Management And Leadership : A Critical Literature Review. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(2).
27.
ErridaA.LotfiB. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, 1–15.
28.
FridayJ. E.OviriU. B. (2024). Collaborative Technology Adoption in Teaching Library and Information Science in Nigerian Universities. International Journal of Information, Library and Society, 13(1), 22–34.
29.
Garrido-MorenoA.Martín-RojasR.García-MoralesV. J. (2024). The key role of innovation and organizational resilience in improving business performance: A mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Information Management, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102777
30.
HaleemA.JavaidM.QadriM. A.SumanR. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285.
31.
HsuH.LiuF.TsouH.ChenL. (2018). Openness of technology adoption, top management support and service innovation: a social innovation perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
32.
HubbartJ. A. (2023). Organizational Change: The Challenge of Change Aversion. Administrative Sciences, 13.
33.
IkenweI. J.UdemO. K. (2022). Innovative Digital Transformation for Dynamic Information Service Sustainability in University Libraries in Nigeria. Folia Toruniensia.
34.
JacksonD.AllenC. (2024). Enablers, barriers and strategies for adopting new technology in accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100666
35.
JainP.TiwariM. N.DhurveS.PatelA. (2024). Cloud Based Integrated Library Systems in Government Colleges: Enhancing Access and Efficiency. International Journal of Library and Information Science (IJLIS), 13(2), 10–17.
36.
JaloH.PirkkalainenH. (2024). Effect of user resistance on the organizational adoption of extended reality technologies: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Information Management, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102731
37.
KhanA. U.RafiM.ZhangZ.KhanA. (2023). Determining the impact of technological modernization and management capabilities on user satisfaction and trust in library services. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 72(6/7), 593–611. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1108/GKMC-06-2021-0095
38.
KorsebergL.ElkenM. (2024). Waiting for the revolution: how higher education institutions initially responded to ChatGPT. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01256-4
39.
KotterJ. (1996). Leading Change.
40.
KrasnopevtsevaN. J.ThomasC.KaminskaR. (2025). Organizing for resilience in high-risk organizations: The interplay between managerial coordination and control in resolving stability/flexibility tensions in a nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Research, 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115120
41.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus Group Interviewing. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (4th ed., pp. 506–534). DOI:10.1002/9781119171386.ch20
42.
KwegyiribaA.FynnP. K.MensahR. O.AidooE.EnchillY. T. (2021). Adoption of Technology Acceptance Model in Technical Universities Libraries: Implication to Higher Education in Ghana. Journal of Educational and Psychological Research, 3(2).
43.
LamL.NguyenP.LeN.TranK. (2021). The Relation among Organizational Culture, Knowledge Management, and Innovation Capability: Its Implication for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1).
44.
LonghurstR. (2009). nterviews: In-Depth, Semi-Structured. In ThriftN.KitchinR. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 580–584). https://doi.org/DOI:10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00458-2
45.
MallikarjunaC. (2024). An Analysis of Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 44(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/DOI : 10.14429/djlit.44.02.18958
46.
MansorF. A.JusohY. H. M.HashimM. Z.MuhammadN.OmarS. N. Z. (2023). Employee engagement and organizational performance. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business (IJAFB), 8(50), 69–80. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.55573/IJAFB.085006
47.
MengyueJ.ShuyanT.RuiC.WangshanyuYingH.LoangO. (2023). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Fostering Innovation and Employee Happiness in the Workplace. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business (IJAFB), 8(50), 445–455. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.55573/IJAFB.085031
48.
MorganD. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
49.
MoutonJ. (2001). How to succeed in your Master’s and Doctoral Studies: A South Africanguide and resource book. Van Schaick Publishers.
50.
MyersM. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management. Sage.
51.
NeumeyerX.SantosS. C.MorrisM. H. (2020). Overcoming Barriers to Technology Adoption When Fostering Entrepreneurship Among the Poor: The Role of Technology and Digital Literacy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–14. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1109/TEM.2020.2989740
52.
NicholasK.DeusT. (2024). Technology adoption and its impact on organizational productivity. A case study of Metropolitan International University. METROPOLITAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMICS (MJBE), 3(1), 515–521.
53.
PervinN.MokhtarM. (2022). The Interpretivist Research Paradigm: A Subjective Notion of a Social Context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419–428. https://doi.org/DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/12938
54.
RabbaniG. M. M. N.FuadM. N.HaqueT. A.SiamS. A. J.MahbubM. B. (2024). Exploring the Influence of Bangladeshi Organizational Culture on Internal Communication Practices. Cultural Communication and Socialization Journal (CCSJ), 5(1), 1–6. http://doi.org/10.26480/ccsj.01.2024.01.06
55.
RahmanM. H. (2020a). Changing roles of university libraries of Bangladesh: an exploratory study. Library Hi Tech News, 37(2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-10-2019-0068
56.
RahmanM. H. (2020b). Review of digital record management needs for academic libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 37(3), 21–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-11-2019-0083
57.
RahmanM. H.AhmadA.SawalM. Z. H. M. (2024). The influence of personal factors on resistance to technology adoption in university libraries in Bangladesh. Information Development, 1–18. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/02666669241257196
58.
RahmanM. H.AhmadA.ZakariaS. (2023). Digital humanities practice in university libraries of Bangladesh. Digital Library Perspectives, 39(3), 311–325.
59.
RahmanM. H.GhazaliA. M.SawalM. Z. H. M. (2024). Reasons for resistance to technology adoption in university libraries in Bangladesh. Information Development, 1–14.
60.
RahmanM. H.GhazaliA. M.SawalM. Z. H. M. (2025). The Influence of Social Factors on Resistance to Technology Adoption in University Libraries in Bangladesh. Science & Technology Libraries. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2025.2462838
61.
RahmanM. M. (2021). Adoption of Digital Devices and e-Resources in University Libraries of Bangladesh: A Reflective Study. Bangladesh Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(3), 37–62.
62.
RahmaniM. (2022). Identifying and evaluating the challenges facing the management of digital libraries. International Journal of Innovation in Management and Organizational Behavior, 2(3), 1–11.
63.
RajanR.GanesanR. (2017). A Critical Analysis of John P. Kotter‟s Change Management Framework. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 7(7), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7307.2017.00106.2
64.
RobertsR.FlinR.MillarD.CorradiL. (2021). Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry. Technovation, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102219
65.
SahayS.GoldthwaiteC. (2023). Participatory Practices During Organizational Change: Rethinking Participation and Resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189231187883
66.
SarfrazM.ShahW. H. (2023). Organizational Culture Change and Technology: Navigating the Digital Transformation. In Organizational Culture - Cultural Change and Technology.
67.
ShahzadK.KhanS. A. (2023). Effects of e-learning technologies on university librarians and libraries: a systematic literature review. The Electronic Library, 41(4), 528–554.
68.
ShahzadK.KhanS. A.IqbalA. (2024). Factors influencing the adoption of robotic technologies in academic libraries: A systematic literature review (SLR). Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 1–18. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/09610006241231012
69.
ShathiA. K. M. S. J. (2019). Knowledge Management Practices in University Libraries of Bangladesh. NU Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences & Business Studies, 5 & 6(2 & 1).
70.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In I. N. K. D. . Y. and S. Lincoln (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). Sage Publications.
71.
TalwarS.DhirA.IslamN.KaurP.AlmusharrafA. (2023). Resistance of multiple stakeholders to e-health innovations: Integration of fundamental insights and guiding research paths. Journal of Business Research, 166.
72.
TenschertJ.FurtnerM.PetersM. (2024). The effects of self-leadership and mindfulness training on leadership development: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly.
73.
ThiruppathiK. (2024). Librarian’s Role in The Digital Age: Reimagining the Profession in the Era of Information Abundance. International Journal of Library and Information Science (IJLIS), 13(1), 1–9.
74.
VenkateshV.BalaH. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
75.
WuC.WangY. (2011). UNDERSTANDING PROACTIVE LEADERSHIP. Advances in Global Leadership, 6, 297–312.
76.
YayehF. A. (2021). Focus Group Discussion as a data collection tool in Economics. Daagu International Journal of Basic & Applied Research-DIJBAR, 3(1), 52–61.
77.
YinR. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.).
78.
YusufS. O.AbubakarJ. E.DurodolaR. L.OcranG.Paul-AdeleyeA. H.YusufP. O. (2024). Impact of AI on continuous learning and skill development in the workplace: A comparative study with traditional methods. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(2), 1129–1140. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2439
79.
ZhangJ.WangY.GaoF. (2024). The dark and bright side of laissez-faire leadership: Does subordinates’ goal orientation make a difference?Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
