This research explores the impact of personal factors on resistance to technology adoption in university libraries in Bangladesh, particularly among LIS (Library and Information Science) professionals. The study aims to reveal specific challenges and opportunities influencing attitudes toward technology integration, offering a nuanced understanding of resistance factors in this unique cultural and educational context. Through a qualitative case study with 21 LIS professionals from seven university libraries, conducted via semi-structured interviews guided by a questionnaire, recurring themes such as fear of job displacement, perceived technological self-efficacy, and concerns about disruptions to workflows emerge. Fear of job displacement refers to professionals’ apprehension about potential job loss due to technological advancements, while perceived technological self-efficacy reflects individuals’ confidence in using and adapting to new technologies. Concerns about disruptions to workflows highlight worries regarding the impact of technology implementation on existing work processes. Despite challenges, participants acknowledge potential benefits, emphasizing improved services. The study advocates for crucial strategies like comprehensive training programs and inclusive decision-making processes to alleviate resistance. This research provides a focused exploration, original insights, and practical value for advancing technology adoption in university libraries in Bangladesh, contributing to a deeper comprehension of complexities in technology integration within academic institutions.
AddisonS (2021) Impact of advancement of technology, competitive pressure, user expectation on continuous digital disruption: mediating role of perceive ease of use. Open Journal of Business and Management9(4): 2013–1079.
2.
AhmadSAmeenKAhmadS (2021) Information professionals’ soft skills status and barriers in its development: a mixed method study. Library Management42(1–2): 80–92.
3.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
4.
AlamMKTabashMIThakurOA, et al. (2023) Independence and effectiveness of Shariah department officers to ensure Shariah compliance: evidence from Islamic banks in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Accounting Research8(1): 15–26.
5.
AlgassimHSepasgozarSMEOstwaldM, et al. (2023) A qualitative study on factors influencing technology adoption in the architecture industry. Buildings13(4): 1100.
6.
ApostolidisCDevineAJabbarA (2022) From chalk to clicks – The impact of (rapid) technology adoption on employee emotions in the higher education sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change182: 121860.
7.
AsimMArifM (2023) Internet of things adoption and use in academic libraries: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Information Science: 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/01655515231188338
8.
AslamM (2022) Changing behavior of academic libraries and role of library professionals. Information Discovery and Delivery50(1): 54–63.
9.
BakirtaşHAkkaşC (2020) Technology readiness and technology acceptance of academic staffs. International Journal of Management Economics and Business16(4): 1043–1058.
10.
BaskaranSLayHSMingBS, et al. (2020) Technology adoption and employee’s job performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences9(1): 78–105.
11.
BuyleRCompernolleMVVlassenrootE, et al. (2018) “Technology readiness and acceptance model” as a predictor for the use intention of data standards in smart cities. Media and Communication6(4): 127–139.
12.
CascioWFMontealegreR (2016) How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior3(1): 349–375.
13.
ChaeHKohCEJeonM (2020) Can cognitive style predict adoption of an emerging technology?: A study of cognitive style and its influence on the perception of a new technology. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction16(1): 18–35.
14.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
DavisFD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly13(3): 319–340.
17.
DemissieDEgziabherFG (2022) An investigation of organizational culture of higher education: The case of Hawassa University. Education Research International2022: 1–14.
18.
Donmez-TuranA (2020) Does unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) reduce resistance and anxiety of individuals towards a new system?Kybernetes49(5): 1381–1405.
19.
DooMY (2023) An investigation of the social influence processes of flipped class students: An application of the extension of the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies28(12): 16593–16613.
20.
FakhrHosseiniSChanKLeeC, et al. (2022) User adoption of intelligent environments: A review of technology adoption models, challenges, and prospects. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction4(4): 986–998.
21.
FariasJSResendeMM (2021) Impact of training on the implementation of a new electronic system and acceptance of new technologies in a federal institution of higher education. Revista de Administração Da UFSM13(4): 773–791.
22.
Frei-LandauRMuchnik-RozanovYAvidov-UngarO (2022) Using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory to conceptualize the mobile-learning adoption process in teacher education in the COVID-19 era. Education and Information Technologies27(9): 12811–12838.
23.
GarciaM (2020) The Rel the Relationship be Tionship between Automation Threa Tion Threat and Employee Rel Yee Related Out Ted Outcomes using Suppor Comes Using Support as a Buffer T as a Buffer and Modera and Moderated by Transform Y Transformational and Transactional L. California State University.
24.
GholamiZAbdekhodaMGavganiVZ (2018) Determinant factors in adopting mobile technology-based services by academic librarians. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology38(4): 271–277.
25.
GlaserBG (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs. Forcing. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
26.
HabibaUAhmedSMZ (2021) ICT Infrastructure and access to online services: Determining the factors affecting faculty satisfaction with university-subscribed resources. International Information and Library Review53(2): 112–130.
27.
HabibaUChowdhuryS (2012) Use of electronic resources and its impact: A study of Dhaka university library users. Eastern Librarian23(1): 74–90.
28.
HanifANaeemSB (2020) Resistance to technological change: Determinants and strategies for LIS professionals. Journal of Information and Computational Science10(6): 786–797.
29.
HanifANaeemSBBhattiR (2021) Library professional’s resistance to innovation: An empirical examination of technostress in Punjab’s university libraries. International Transaction Journal of Engineering Management \& Applied Sciences \& Technologies12(1): 1–8.
30.
HeYChenQKitkuakulS (2018) Regulatory focus and technology acceptance: Perceived ease of use and usefulness as efficacy. Cogent Business & Managemen5(1): 1459006.
31.
HershkovitzADanielEKleinY, et al. (2023) Technology integration in emergency remote teaching: teachers’ self-efficacy and sense of success. Education and Information Technologies28(10): 12433–12464.
32.
HofstedeG (1984) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
33.
HoqueMA (2023) Libraries in the digital age: importance of ict in enhancing value-added library services. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT)11(3): 815–819.
34.
IslamAWangLCHassanH (2022) Delivering remote learning using a low-tech solution: Evidence from an RCT during the Covid-19 Pandemic. EdTech Hub.
35.
KüçükatalayTVardarlierPVayvayÖ, et al. (2023) Identifying the factors affecting individual resistance against organizational change. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies4(1): 120–140.
36.
LaufsJBorrionH (2021) Technological innovation in policing and crime prevention: Practitioner perspectives from London. International Journal of Police Science & Management24(2): 190–209.
37.
MaishaKShetuSN (2023) Influencing factors of e-learning adoption amongst students in a developing country: the post-pandemic scenario in Bangladesh. Future Business Journal9(1): 37.
38.
MannanMMustafaZBAzizSFBA, et al. (2023) Technology adoption for higher education in Bangladesh – development and validation. Journal of Education and Social Sciences24(1): 1–9.
39.
MasumAKMKabirMJChowdhuryMM (2015) Determinants that influencing the adoption of E-HRM: An empirical study on Bangladesh. Asian Social Science11(21): 117–124.
40.
MerriamSB (2009) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
MithasSRamasubbuNSambamurthyV (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly35(1): 237.
42.
MorseJM (1995) The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research5(2): 147–149.
43.
MugoDGNjagiKChemweiB, et al. (2017) The technology acceptance model (TAM) and its application to the utilization of mobile learning technologies. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science20(4): 1–8.
44.
NakhodaMTajikS (2017) A survey of the factors influencing the resistance of the employees of university libraries to technological changes: Study of libraries of Tehran University. Library Management38(8–9): 528–546.
45.
NaveedRTAlhaidanHHalbusiHA, et al. (2022) Do organizations really evolve? The critical link between organizational culture and organizational innovation toward organizational effectiveness: Pivotal role of organizational resistance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge7(2): 100178.
46.
OkereO (2022) Factors affecting librarians’ use of information and communication technologies (ICTS) in federal colleges of education, SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal): 1–25.
47.
OutcaultSSanguinettiANelsonL (2022) Technology characteristics that influence adoption of residential distributed energy resources: Adapting Rogers’ framework. Energy Policy168: 113153.
48.
PaimanNFauziMA (2023) Exploring determinants of social media addiction in higher education through the integrated lenses of technology acceptance model (TAM) and usage habit. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education16(3): 776–803.
49.
ParasuramanA (2000) Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research2(4): 307–320.
50.
ParkIKimDMoonJ, et al. (2022) Searching for new technology acceptance model under social context: Analyzing the determinants of acceptance of intelligent information technology in digital transformation and implications for the requisites of digital sustainability. Sustainability14(1): 1–29.
51.
PoojaJKrishnanLRK (2023) Evaluating the impact of disruptive technologies in the employee engagement process –IT industry perspective. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field9(11).
52.
PremkumarGRobertsM (1999) Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. The International Journal of Management Science27: 467–484.
53.
RahmanMH (2020) Changing roles of university libraries of Bangladesh: an exploratory study. Library Hi Tech News37(2): 5–9.
54.
RahmanMHAhmadAZakariaS (2023) Digital humanities practice in university libraries of Bangladesh. Digital Library Perspectives39(3): 311–325.
55.
RamS (1987) A model of innovation resistance. Advances in Consumer Research14(1): 208–212.
56.
RehmanNMahmoodAIbtasamM, et al. (2021) The psychology of resistance to change: The antidotal effect of organizational justice, support and leader-member exchange. Frontiers in Psychology12: 1–15.
57.
RivardS (2012) Information technology implementers’ responses to user resistance: Nature and effects. MIS Quarterly36(3): 897–920.
58.
SandelowskiM (1995) Qualitative analysis: what it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing and Health18(4): 371–375.
59.
ShahzadKIqbalA (2020) Barriers F Barriers faced by library professionals for sessional for technology adoption technology adoption in university libraries of Lahore, Pakistan. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal).
60.
ShahzadKKhanSALatifM, et al. (2023) Relationship between personal traits and sustainable competence development among librarians in relation to value-added library services in a networked world: A systematic literature review from 2002 to 2022. Sustainability15(3): 2359.
61.
ShirishABatuekuenoL (2021) Technology renewal, user resistance, user adoption: Status quo bias theory revisited. Journal of Organizational Change Management34(5): 874–893.
62.
TabassumMRoknuzzamanMIslamMM (2015) Usage of a digital library system at a private university library in Bangladesh. Annals of Library and Information Studies62(2): 94–103.
63.
TanPSHSeowANChoongYO, et al. (2023) University students’ perceived service quality and attitude towards hybrid learning: ease of use and usefulness as mediators. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
64.
TautSBraunsD (2003) Resistance to evaluation: A psychological perspective. Evaluation9(3): 247–264.
65.
ThompsonRLHigginsCAHowellJM (1991) Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems15(1): 125–142.
66.
TungTMHuongDTTOanhVTK (2023) An investigation on knowledge-based entrepreneurship in higher education. International Journal of Professional Business Review8(9): 1–10.
67.
UrenVEdwardsJS (2023) Technology readiness and the organizational journey towards AI adoption: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management68: 102588.
68.
VenkateshVBalaH (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences39(2): 273–315.
69.
VenkateshVDavisFD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science46(2): 186–204.
70.
YinRK (2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
